Literature DB >> 24365017

The spatial arrangement of blastomeres at the 4-cell stage and IVF outcome.

Goedele Paternot1, Sophie Debrock2, Diane De Neubourg3, Thomas M D'Hooghe4, Carl Spiessens5.   

Abstract

This study compared the developmental and implantation potential of tetrahedrally arranged versus non-tetrahedrally arranged 4-cell-stage embryos. If the cleavage planes of a 4-cell-stage embryo were perpendicularly orientated, blastomeres were defined as tetrahedrally arranged, while embryos with parallel-orientated cleavage axes were considered as non-tetrahedral embryos. The 4-cell-stage embryos (n=862) examined in this study were obtained from 299 patients aged <36 years. A total of 299 embryos were transferred as a single-embryo transfer on day 3. This study showed that tetrahedral embryos developed into a 8-cell-stage embryo on day 3 more frequently (307, 45% versus 42, 24%; P<0.0001) and also developed more frequently into good-quality embryos (461, 67% versus 67, 38%; P<0.0001) and into excellent-quality embryos (290, 42% versus 34, 19%; P<0.0001). Tetrahedral embryos had a significantly higher implantation potential (98, 38% versus 9, 21%; P=0.038), ongoing pregnancy rate (84, 33% versus 7, 16%; P=0.032) and live birth rate (84, 33% versus 7, 16%; P=0.032). In conclusion, tetrahedral 4-cell-stage embryos on day 2 developed into embryos of better quality on day 3 with a higher implantation potential and live birth rate compared with non-tetrahedral 4-cell-stage embryos. In this study, an additional characteristic of 4-cell-stage embryos has been evaluated. The aim of the study was to evaluate the spatial arrangement of blastomeres in a 4-cell-stage embryo. If the cleavage planes of a 4-cell-stage embryo were perpendicularly orientated (indicating that both axes meet a right angle), blastomeres were defined as tetrahedral arranged while the other embryos were considered as non-tetrahedral embryos. The 4-cell-stage embryos (n=862) examined in this study were obtained from 299 patients aged <36 years. A total of 299 embryos were transferred as a single-embryo transfer on day 3. This study showed that tetrahedral embryos developed into an 8-cell-stage embryo on day 3 more frequently (307, 45% versus 42, 24%; P<0.0001) and also developed more frequently into good-quality embryos (461, 67% versus 67, 38%; P<0.0001) and excellent-quality embryos (290, 42% versus 34, 19%; P<0.0001). Tetrahedral embryos had a significantly higher implantation potential (98, 38% versus 9, 21%; P=0.038), ongoing pregnancy rate (84, 33% versus 7, 16%; P=0.032) and live birth rate (84, 33% versus 7, 16%; P=0.032). In conclusion, tetrahedral 4-cell-stage embryos on day 2 developed into embryos of better quality on day 3 with a higher implantation potential and live birth rate compared with non-tetrahedral 4-cell-stage embryos.
Copyright © 2013 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  4-cell-stage embryos; IVF; embryo quality; embryo selection; live birth rate; spatial arrangement

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24365017     DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.10.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online        ISSN: 1472-6483            Impact factor:   3.828


  3 in total

1.  Developmental capacity and pregnancy rate of tetrahedral- versus non-tetrahedral-shaped 4-cell stage human embryos.

Authors:  T Ebner; P Oppelt; R B Mayer; O Shebl
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Is there a better evolutionary outcome in a 4-cell tetrahedron embryo?

Authors:  Marta Ribeiro Hentschke; Ricardo Azambuja; Victória Campos Dornelles; Bibiana Cunegatto; Cristina Hickman; Rishabh Hariharan; Isadora Badalotti Telöken; Catarina Heckmann Petracco; Fabiana Mariani Wingert; Alvaro Petracco; Mariangela Badalotti
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2021-10-04

3.  Functional substitution of zona pellucida with modified sodium hyaluronate gel in human embryos.

Authors:  Jinzhu Song; Jingye Zhang; Xinyi Yuan; Boyang Liu; Wenrong Tao; Chuanxin Zhang; Keliang Wu
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 3.357

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.