| Literature DB >> 34414988 |
Ahmed Abduljawad Salim1, Safaa Hussain Ali2, Ansam Munadel Hussain3, Wisam Nabeel Ibrahim4,5.
Abstract
ABSTRACT: This study aimed to investigate evidence of gray matter brain lesions in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients by evaluating the resting state alpha rhythm of brain electrical activity.The study included 50 patients diagnosed with MS recruited from the MS clinic with 50 age and gender-matched control participants. The study investigated parameters of posterior dominant rhythm (PDR) in the electroencephalography (EEG) recordings including wave frequency and amplitude. Functional disability among the patients was evaluated according to the expanded disability status scale. Univariate statistical analysis was completed using one-way analysis of variance and t test with a P value of less than .05 to indicate statistical significance.Patients with MS had significantly lower PDR frequency and amplitude values compared to the controls (P value < .01) and 34% of the MS patients had a PDR frequency of less than 8.5 Hz. The PDR frequency was negatively associated with the level of functional disability among the patients (P value <.001) and 4% of the patients had abnormal epileptiform discharges.Background slowing of resting alpha rhythms and epileptiform discharges are suggestive of gray matter degeneration and may help in the prediction and follow-up of cortical damage and functional disabilities among MS patients. Therefore, electroencephalography monitoring of the PDR spectrum may serve as an alternative or complementary tool with other imaging techniques to detect and monitor cerebral cortical lesions.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34414988 PMCID: PMC8376360 DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000027001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) ISSN: 0025-7974 Impact factor: 1.817
Figure 1Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrating multiple sagittal section views of a multiple sclerosis patient brain highlighting in black arrows typical multiple white matter plaque lesions in the periventricular region of the brain.
Clinical and demographic characteristics of study participants.
| Variables | Patients N (%) | Controls N (%) |
| Age (yrs) | ||
| <40 | 33 (66) | 35 (70) |
| >40 | 17 (34) | 15 (30) |
| Mean ± SD | 37.2 ± 9.731 | 35.34 ± 9.32 |
| Gender | ||
| Male | 16 (32) | 16 (32) |
| Female | 34 (68) | 34 (68) |
| Medications | ||
| Betaferon | 22 (45) | – |
| Rebif | 19 (39) | – |
| Avonex | 6 (12) | – |
| No treatment | 2 (4) | – |
| Family history | ||
| Positive | 1 (2) | 0 |
| Negative | 49 (98) | 50 (100) |
| Duration of illness | ||
| <5 years | 25 (50) | – |
| 5–10 years | 23 (46) | – |
| >10 years | 2 (4) | – |
| Subtype of MS disease | ||
| RRMS | 46 (92) | – |
| PPMS | 2 (4) | – |
| SPMS | 2 (4) | – |
| PRMS | 0 | – |
| EDSS | ||
| 0 | 10 (20) | 50 (100) |
| 1 | 9 (18) | 0 |
| 2 | 8 (16) | 0 |
| 3 | 3 (6) | 0 |
| 4 | 8 (16) | 0 |
| 5 | 3 (6) | 0 |
| 6 | 2 (4) | 0 |
| 7 | 5 (10) | 0 |
| 8 | 2 (4) | 0 |
EDSS = the expanded disability status scale, MS = multiple sclerosis, PPMS = primary progressive multiple sclerosis, PRMS = progressive relapsing multiple sclerosis, RRMS = relapsing-remitting multiple clerosis, SD = standard deviation, SPMS = secondary progressive multiple sclerosis.
Analysis of PDR waves frequency and amplitude of the EEG recordings among MS patients and controls.
| PDR parameters | MS patients | Controls | |
| PDR frequency (Mean ± SD) | 8.680 ± 1.587 | 10.307 ± 0.979 | .000∗∗ |
| Amplitude of PDR (Mean ± SD) | 41.060 ± 20.693 | 51.618 ± 21.226 | .013∗ |
Unite of measurement for PDR waves frequency is Hertz (Hz) while the measurement unites of PDR waves amplitude is μ volt (μv). Data shown are mean value ± SD (n = 50, t test, ∗P value ≤.05, ∗∗P value ≤.001(.
EEG = electroencephalography, MS = multiple sclerosis, PDR = posterior dominant rhythm, SD = standard deviation.
Figure 2EEG recording of MS patient demonstrating epileptiform activity. Recorded by Micro med Electroencephalograph instrument with System Plus Evolution software. EEG = electroencephalography, MS = multiple sclerosis.
Figure 3Scatter plot of PDR waves frequencies and amplitudes according to the EDSS among MS patients. Triangle dots are actual PDR frequency values with the horizontal and vertical lines representative of mean and standard deviation values, respectively, one-way analysis of variance test, ∗∗P value <.00 (. EDSS = expanded disability status scale, MS = multiple sclerosis, PDR = posterior dominant rhythm.
Figure 4Comparison of PDR wave frequencies and amplitudes distribution among different groups of MS patients according to the disease duration. Data shown are mean value ± SD comparison between groups was completed using one-way analysis of variance test. MS = multiple sclerosis, PDR = posterior dominant rhythm, SD = standard deviation.