Josa M Frischer1, Stephen D Weigand2, Yong Guo3, Nilufer Kale3, Joseph E Parisi3,4, Istvan Pirko3, Jay Mandrekar2, Stephan Bramow5,6, Imke Metz7, Wolfgang Brück7, Hans Lassmann8, Claudia F Lucchinetti3. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria. 2. Department of Health Sciences Research, College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. 3. Department of Neurology, College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. 4. Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. 5. Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg, Denmark. 6. Department of Pathology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark. 7. Department of Neuropathology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany. 8. Department of Neuroimmunology, Center for Brain Research, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: An extensive analysis of white matter plaques in a large sample of multiple sclerosis (MS) autopsies provides insights into the dynamic nature of MS pathology. METHODS: One hundred twenty MS cases (1,220 tissue blocks) were included. Plaque types were classified according to demyelinating activity based on stringent criteria. Early active, late active, smoldering, inactive, and shadow plaques were distinguished. A total of 2,476 MS white matter plaques were identified. Plaque type distribution was analyzed in relation to clinical data. RESULTS: Active plaques were most often found in early disease, whereas at later stages, smoldering, inactive, and shadow plaques predominated. The presence of early active plaques rapidly declined with disease duration. Plaque type distribution differed significantly by clinical course. The majority of plaques in acute monophasic and relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) were active. Among secondary progressive MS (SPMS) cases with attacks, all plaque types could be distinguished including active plaques, in contrast to SPMS without attacks, in which inactive plaques predominated. Smoldering plaques were frequently and almost exclusively found in progressive MS. At 47 years of age, an equilibrium was observed between active and inactive plaques, whereas smoldering plaques began to peak. Men displayed a higher proportion of smoldering plaques. INTERPRETATION: Disease duration, clinical course, age, and gender contribute to the dynamic nature of white matter MS pathology. Active MS plaques predominate in acute and early RRMS and are the likely substrate of clinical attacks. Progressive MS transitions to an accumulation of smoldering plaques characterized by microglial activation and slow expansion of pre-existing plaques. Whether current MS therapeutics impact this pathological driver of disease progression remains uncertain.
OBJECTIVE: An extensive analysis of white matter plaques in a large sample of multiple sclerosis (MS) autopsies provides insights into the dynamic nature of MS pathology. METHODS: One hundred twenty MS cases (1,220 tissue blocks) were included. Plaque types were classified according to demyelinating activity based on stringent criteria. Early active, late active, smoldering, inactive, and shadow plaques were distinguished. A total of 2,476 MS white matter plaques were identified. Plaque type distribution was analyzed in relation to clinical data. RESULTS: Active plaques were most often found in early disease, whereas at later stages, smoldering, inactive, and shadow plaques predominated. The presence of early active plaques rapidly declined with disease duration. Plaque type distribution differed significantly by clinical course. The majority of plaques in acute monophasic and relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) were active. Among secondary progressive MS (SPMS) cases with attacks, all plaque types could be distinguished including active plaques, in contrast to SPMS without attacks, in which inactive plaques predominated. Smoldering plaques were frequently and almost exclusively found in progressive MS. At 47 years of age, an equilibrium was observed between active and inactive plaques, whereas smoldering plaques began to peak. Men displayed a higher proportion of smoldering plaques. INTERPRETATION: Disease duration, clinical course, age, and gender contribute to the dynamic nature of white matter MS pathology. Active MS plaques predominate in acute and early RRMS and are the likely substrate of clinical attacks. Progressive MS transitions to an accumulation of smoldering plaques characterized by microglial activation and slow expansion of pre-existing plaques. Whether current MS therapeutics impact this pathological driver of disease progression remains uncertain.
Authors: J W Prineas; E E Kwon; E S Cho; L R Sharer; M H Barnett; E L Oleszak; B Hoffman; B P Morgan Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2001-11 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Stephan Bramow; Josa M Frischer; Hans Lassmann; Nils Koch-Henriksen; Claudia F Lucchinetti; Per S Sørensen; Henning Laursen Journal: Brain Date: 2010-09-20 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Esther C W Breij; Bianca P Brink; Rob Veerhuis; Christa van den Berg; Rianka Vloet; Riqiang Yan; Christine D Dijkstra; Paul van der Valk; Lars Bö Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Frederik Barkhof; Wolfgang Bruck; Corline J A De Groot; Elisabeth Bergers; Sandra Hulshof; Jeroen Geurts; Chris H Polman; Paul van der Valk Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2003-08
Authors: W I McDonald; A Compston; G Edan; D Goodkin; H P Hartung; F D Lublin; H F McFarland; D W Paty; C H Polman; S C Reingold; M Sandberg-Wollheim; W Sibley; A Thompson; S van den Noort; B Y Weinshenker; J S Wolinsky Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2001-07 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Josa M Frischer; Stephan Bramow; Assunta Dal-Bianco; Claudia F Lucchinetti; Helmut Rauschka; Manfred Schmidbauer; Henning Laursen; Per Soelberg Sorensen; Hans Lassmann Journal: Brain Date: 2009-03-31 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: J-M Tillema; S D Weigand; M Dayan; Y Shu; O H Kantarci; C F Lucchinetti; J D Port Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2018-04-26 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Martina Absinta; Pascal Sati; Matthew Schindler; Emily C Leibovitch; Joan Ohayon; Tianxia Wu; Alessandro Meani; Massimo Filippi; Steven Jacobson; Irene C M Cortese; Daniel S Reich Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2016-06-06 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Ulrike W Kaunzner; Yeona Kang; Shun Zhang; Eric Morris; Yihao Yao; Sneha Pandya; Sandra M Hurtado Rua; Calvin Park; Kelly M Gillen; Thanh D Nguyen; Yi Wang; David Pitt; Susan A Gauthier Journal: Brain Date: 2019-01-01 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Lindsay S Cahill; Monan Angela Zhang; Valeria Ramaglia; Heather Whetstone; Melika Pahlevan Sabbagh; Tae Joon Yi; Laura Woo; Thomas S Przybycien; Marina Moshkova; Fei Linda Zhao; Olga L Rojas; Josephine Gomes; Stefanie Kuerten; Jennifer L Gommerman; John G Sled; Shannon E Dunn Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2019-10-22 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Ana Feliú; Itziar Bonilla Del Río; Francisco Javier Carrillo-Salinas; Gloria Hernández-Torres; Leyre Mestre; Nagore Puente; Silvia Ortega-Gutiérrez; Maria L López-Rodríguez; Pedro Grandes; Miriam Mecha; Carmen Guaza Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2017-07-27 Impact factor: 6.167