| Literature DB >> 34414548 |
J Marvin Soeder1,2, Julia Luthardt3, Michael Rullmann4,3, Georg A Becker3, Mohammed K Hankir5, Marianne Patt3, Philipp M Meyer3, Tatjana Schütz4, Yu-Shin Ding6, Anja Hilbert4,7, Arne Dietrich4,8, Osama Sabri3, Swen Hesse4,3.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery is currently the most efficient treatment to achieve long-term weight loss in individuals with severe obesity. This is largely attributed to marked reductions in food intake mediated in part by changes in gut-brain communication. Here, we investigated for the first time whether weight loss after RYGB is associated with alterations in central noradrenaline (NA) neurotransmission.Entities:
Keywords: MRB; Noradrenaline; Noradrenaline transporter; Obesity; PET; RYGB
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34414548 PMCID: PMC8490257 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-021-05657-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Obes Surg ISSN: 0960-8923 Impact factor: 3.479
Fig. 1BMI before and 6 months after RYGB surgery (n = 9)
Fig. 2Distribution volume ratios (DVR) of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) before (pre-surgical) and 6 months after (post-surgical) RYGB (n = 9)
Comparison of distribution volume ratios (DVR; occipital cortex as reference region) of pre- and post-surgical data (n=9)
| Brain region | Mean DVR ± SD pre | Mean DVR ± SD post | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medial prefrontal cortex | r | 1.07 ± 0.05 | 1.07 ± 0.04 | 0.67 |
| l | 1.06 ± 0.04 | 1.05 ± 0.07 | 0.44 | |
| Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex | r | 1.11 ± 0.04 | 1.07 ± 0.08 | 0.07 |
| Orbitofrontal cortex | r | 1.04 ± 0.08 | 1.04 ± 0.12 | 0.25 |
| l | 1.09 ± 0.06 | 1.05 ± 0.11 | 0.30 | |
| Anterior cingulate cortex | r | 1.16 ± 0.07 | 1.10 ± 0.14 | 0.14 |
| l | 1.18 ± 0.07 | 1.14 ± 0.11 | 0.27 | |
| Insula | r | 1.23 ± 0.06 | 1.20 ± 0.08 | 0.17 |
| l | 1.20 ± 0.08 | 1.17 ± 0.13 | 0.37 | |
| Hippocampus | r | 1.10 ± 0.08 | 1.04 ± 0.17 | 0.31 |
| l | 1.12 ± 0.06 | 1.08 ± 0.18 | 0.53 | |
| Head of the caudate | r | 1.14 ± 0.10 | 1.11 ± 0.07 | 0.29 |
| l | 1.15 ± 0.07 | 1.07 ± 0.13 | 0.16 | |
| Putamen | r | 1.19 ± 0.15 | 1.13 ± 0.18 | 0.33 |
| l | 1.21 ± 0.11 | 1.20 ± 0.09 | 0.44 | |
| Thalamus | r | 1.56 ± 0.18 | 1.53 ± 0.20 | 0.61 |
| l | 1.55 ± 0.16 | 1.45 ± 0.22 | 0.10 | |
| Hypothalamus | r | 1.44 ± 0.12 | 1.32 ± 0.29 | 0.36 |
| l | 1.45 ± 0.18 | 1.27 ± 0.19 | 0.06 | |
| Cerebellar cortex | r | 1.08 ± 0.05 | 1.05 ± 0.03 | 0.12 |
| l | 1.08 ± 0.05 | 1.07 ± 0.05 | 0.22 | |
| Locus coeruleus | 0.42 ± 0.17 | 0.29 ± 0.30 | 0.17 | |
| Raphe dorsalis | 0.51 ± 0.17 | 0.42 ± 0.21 | 0.38 |
Fig. 3Comparison of mean distribution volume ratios (DVR) before (n = 10) and 6 months after RYGB (n = 9)
Correlations (Pearson’s correlation coefficient r) between pre-surgical DVR and pre-surgical BMI (n = 10) as well as with change in BMI (Δ BMI) over 6 months after RYGB (n = 9)
| Brain regions (DVR) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medial prefrontal cortex | r | − 0.097 | 0.79 | 0.140 | 0.72 |
| l | − 0.036 | 0.92 | 0.416 | 0.27 | |
| Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex | r | − 0.449 | 0.19 | − 0.186 | 0.63 |
| 0.586 | 0.10 | ||||
| Orbitofrontal cortex | − | − 0.224 | 0.56 | ||
| − | − 0.460 | 0.21 | |||
| Anterior cingulate cortex | r | − 0.410 | 0.24 | − 0.331 | 0.39 |
| − | − 0.540 | 0.13 | |||
| Insula | r | − 0.476 | 0.16 | 0.203 | 0.60 |
| l | − 0.511 | 0.13 | − 0.077 | 0.84 | |
| Hippocampus | r | − 0.431 | 0.21 | − 0.637 | 0.07 |
| l | − 0.258 | 0.47 | 0.122 | 0.76 | |
| Head of the caudate | r | − 0.188 | 0.60 | − 0.100 | 0.80 |
| 0.332 | 0.35 | ||||
| Putamen | 0.062 | 0.86 | − | ||
| − 0.135 | 0.71 | − | |||
| Thalamus | r | 0.157 | 0.67 | − 0.176 | 0.65 |
| l | 0.077 | 0.83 | − 0.099 | 0.80 | |
| Hypothalamus | 0.361 | 0.31 | |||
| l | − 0.517 | 0.13 | − 0.374 | 0.32 | |
| Cerebellar cortex | r | − 0.433 | 0.21 | − 0.217 | 0.58 |
| − | − 0.490 | 0.18 | |||
| Locus coeruleus | 0.339 | 0.34 | − 0.191 | 0.62 | |
| Raphe dorsalis | 0.009 | 0.98 | 0.463 | 0.21 |
Fig. 4Correlation between pre-surgical distribution volume ratios (DVR) and changes in body mass index (ΔBMI) (n = 9). This positive correlation indicates a relationship between a pre-surgical DVR and BMI reduction, i.e., the higher the pre-surgical DVR, the greater the decrease in BMI
Fig. 5Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ) hunger subscale scores before (pre-surgical) and 6 months after (post-surgical) RYGB surgery (n = 10)
Fig. 6Correlation between pre-surgical distribution volume ratios (DVR) of left insula and pre-surgical scores TFEQ hunger subscale (n = 10, curved lines show 95% confidence interval)