Literature DB >> 34413344

A randomized-controlled neurofeedback trial in adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Beatrix Barth1,2,3, Kerstin Mayer-Carius4,5, Ute Strehl4, Sarah N Wyckoff4,6, Florian B Haeussinger7, Andreas J Fallgatter7,8,9, Ann-Christine Ehlis7,10,8.   

Abstract

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a childhood onset disorder persisting into adulthood for a large proportion of cases. Neurofeedback (NF) has shown promising results in children with ADHD, but randomized controlled trials in adults with ADHD are scarce. We aimed to compare slow cortical potential (SCP)- and functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) NF to a semi-active electromyography biofeedback (EMG-BF) control condition regarding changes in symptoms and the impact of learning success, as well as changes in neurophysiological parameters in an adult ADHD population. Patients were randomly assigned to SCP-NF (n = 26), fNIRS-NF (n = 21) or EMG-BF (n = 20). Outcome parameters were assessed over 30 training sessions (pre, intermediate, post) and at 6-months follow-up (FU) including 3 booster sessions. EEG was recorded during two auditory Go/NoGo paradigms assessing the P300 and contingent negative variation (CNV). fNIRS measurements were conducted during an n-back- as well as a Go/NoGo task. All three groups showed equally significant symptom improvements suggesting placebo- or non-specific effects on the primary outcome measure. Only when differentiating between learners and non-learners, fNIRS learners displayed stronger reduction of ADHD global scores compared to SCP non-learners at FU, and fNIRS learners showed specifically low impulsivity ratings. 30.8% in the SCP-NF and 61.9% of participants in the fNIRS-NF learned to regulate the respective NF target parameter. We conclude that some adults with ADHD learn to regulate SCP amplitudes and especially prefrontal hemodynamic activity during NF. We did not find any significant differences in outcome between groups when looking at the whole sample. When evaluating learners only, they demonstrate superior effects as compared to non-learners, which suggests specific effects in addition to non-specific effects of NF when learning occurs.
© 2021. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34413344      PMCID: PMC8376871          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-95928-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.996


  48 in total

Review 1.  An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function.

Authors:  E K Miller; J D Cohen
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 12.449

2.  CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION: AN ELECTRIC SIGN OF SENSORIMOTOR ASSOCIATION AND EXPECTANCY IN THE HUMAN BRAIN.

Authors:  W G WALTER; R COOPER; V J ALDRIDGE; W C MCCALLUM; A L WINTER
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1964-07-25       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  What is the optimal task difficulty for reinforcement learning of brain self-regulation?

Authors:  Robert Bauer; Mathias Vukelić; Alireza Gharabaghi
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-06-25       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 4.  The age-dependent decline of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a meta-analysis of follow-up studies.

Authors:  Stephen V Faraone; Joseph Biederman; Eric Mick
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 7.723

Review 5.  Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a selective overview.

Authors:  Joseph Biederman
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2004-12-18       Impact factor: 13.382

6.  [Reliability and validity of the Wender-Utah-Rating-Scale short form. Retrospective assessment of symptoms for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder].

Authors:  P Retz-Junginger; W Retz; D Blocher; R-D Stieglitz; T Georg; T Supprian; P H Wender; M Rösler
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.214

7.  Identification of neurophysiological biotypes in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Beatrix Barth; Kerstin Mayer-Carius; Ute Strehl; Augustin Kelava; Florian Benedikt Häußinger; Andreas Jochen Fallgatter; Ann-Christine Ehlis
Journal:  Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 5.188

Review 8.  Nonpharmacological interventions for ADHD: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials of dietary and psychological treatments.

Authors:  Edmund J S Sonuga-Barke; Daniel Brandeis; Samuele Cortese; David Daley; Maite Ferrin; Martin Holtmann; Jim Stevenson; Marina Danckaerts; Saskia van der Oord; Manfred Döpfner; Ralf W Dittmann; Emily Simonoff; Alessandro Zuddas; Tobias Banaschewski; Jan Buitelaar; David Coghill; Chris Hollis; Eric Konofal; Michel Lecendreux; Ian C K Wong; Joseph Sergeant
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 18.112

Review 9.  Inhibition and impulsivity: behavioral and neural basis of response control.

Authors:  Andrea Bari; Trevor W Robbins
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2013-07-13       Impact factor: 11.685

10.  fMRI Neurofeedback Training for Increasing Anterior Cingulate Cortex Activation in Adult Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. An Exploratory Randomized, Single-Blinded Study.

Authors:  Anna Zilverstand; Bettina Sorger; Dorine Slaats-Willemse; Cornelis C Kan; Rainer Goebel; Jan K Buitelaar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  A pilot meta-analysis on self-reported efficacy of neurofeedback for adolescents and adults with ADHD.

Authors:  Hsin-Yi Fan; Cheuk-Kwan Sun; Yu-Shian Cheng; Weilun Chung; Ruu-Fen Tzang; Hsien-Jane Chiu; Chun-Ning Ho; Kuo-Chuan Hung
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 4.996

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.