| Literature DB >> 34408881 |
Youhei Nakamura1, Kenji Kusakabe2, Shota Nakao2, Yasushi Hagihara1,2, Tetsuya Matsuoka2.
Abstract
AIM: Vertebral artery injury associated with blunt traumatic cervical spine injury sometimes causes severe cerebellar and brain stem infarction. No treatment guidelines for vertebral artery injury aimed at preventing stroke have been decided. We have conducted endovascular embolization in patients with up to Denver grade IV cerebrovascular injury complicated by unstable cervical spine injury before open reduction and fixation surgery. The purpose of this study was to validate the clinical course of vertebral artery injury and especially endovascular treatment for grade IV patients in our hospital.Entities:
Keywords: Cervical spine fracture; VAI; endovascular therapy; grade IV; prevention of stroke
Year: 2021 PMID: 34408881 PMCID: PMC8359820 DOI: 10.1002/ams2.670
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acute Med Surg ISSN: 2052-8817
The Denver Grading Scale
| Grade I | Irregularity of the vessel wall or lumen stenosis <25% |
| Grade II | Intimal flap or lumen stenosis >25% |
| Grade III | Pseudoaneurysm |
| Grade IV | Vessel occlusion |
| Grade V | Complete transection of the artery |
Fig. 1Therapeutic algorithm for cervical spine injury patients with grade IV VAI. Endovascular therapy was performed before spinal surgery for Grade IV VAI patients with unstable cervical spine injury (CSI). VAI patients with stable CSI were treated with pharmacotherapy such as antiplatelet agents or anticoagulants as soon as possible. CTA, computed tomography angiography; DSA, digital subtraction angiography.
Characteristics of the patients with and without VAI
| Characteristic | VAI ( | Non‐VAI ( | Total ( |
| Mean age (y) | 62.6 (26–81) | 59.1 (2–94) | 59.7 (2–94) |
| Sex | |||
| Male | 11 | 53 | 64 |
| Female | 4 | 21 | 25 |
| Site of SCI | |||
| C1 | 2 | 9 | 11 |
| C2 | 2 | 23 | 25 |
| C3 | 2 | 6 | 8 |
| C4 | 3 | 12 | 15 |
| C5 | 7 | 12 | 19 |
| C6 | 7 | 19 | 26 |
| C7 | 1 | 25 | 26 |
| Subluxation | 8 | 16 | 24 |
| Mechanism of injuries | |||
| Traffic accident | 7 | 38 | 45 |
| Fall | 8 | 33 | 41 |
| Others | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Complications of SCI | 9 | 29 | 38 |
| Injury Severity Score (median) | 17 | 17 | 17 |
SCI, spinal cord injury; VAI, vertebral artery injury.
Details of the 15 patients with VAI
| Case no. | Age | Sex | Grade | IVR | Type of CSI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 50s | M | rt I | None | Subluxation (C6) |
| 2 | 50s | F | rt I | None | Jefferson fracture |
| 3 | 70s | M | rt II | None | Jefferson fracture |
| 4 | 70s | M | rt IV; lt I | Coil emboli | Subluxation (C4) |
| 5 | 60s | F | lt IV | Coil emboli | Jefferson fracture |
| 6 | 20s | M | lt IV | Coil emboli | Fractures involving transverse foramen (lt C4–C6) |
| 7 | 40s | M | rt IV | Coil emboli | Subluxation (C5) |
| 8 | 70s | M | rt IV | Plug emboli | Subluxation (C5) |
| 9 | 60s | M | rt IV | Coil + plug emboli | Subluxation (C3) |
| 10 | 70s | M | rt IV | Coil + plug emboli | Fractures involving transverse foramen (rt C4–C5) |
| 11 | 60s | M | bi IV | Coil emboli | Subluxation (C5) |
| 12 | 50s | M | bi IV | Coil + plug emboli | Subluxation (C5), fractures involving transverse foramen (lt C5–C6) |
| 13 | 80s | F | lt IV | None | Fractures involving transverse foramen (lt C6) |
| 14 | 50s | F | rt IV | None | Fractures involving transverse foramen (rt C6–C7) |
| 15 | 70s | M | rt IV; lt II | None | Subluxation (C6) |
bi, bilateral; Coil emboli, coil embolization; CSI, cervical spine injury; IVR, interventional radiology; lt, left; Plug emboli, vascular plug embolization; rt, right; VAI, vertebral artery injury.
Fig. 2CT and DSA results from case 8. (A) Sagittal plane CT scan of cervical spine before reduction showing forward subluxation fracture of C5. (B) CTA of carotid and vertebral arteries reveals right vertebral artery occlusion (arrowhead). (C) DSA of right vertebral artery embolization by vascular plug (arrowhead). (D) Sagittal plane CT scan of cervical spine after open reduction and fixation. CTA, computed tomography angiography; DSA, digital subtraction angiography.
Long‐term follow‐up of the VAI patients
| Case no. | Grade | IVR | Complication of CI | Prognosis | Follow‐up period (months) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | rt I | None | No | Alive | 49 |
| 2 | rt I | None | No | Alive | 26 |
| 3 | rt II | None | No | Alive | 21.5 |
| 4 | rt IV; lt I | Coil emboli | No | Alive | 18.5 |
| 5 | lt IV | Coil emboli | No | Unknown | – |
| 6 | lt IV | Coil emboli | No | Alive | 46 |
| 7 | rt IV | Coil emboli | No | Alive | 38.5 |
| 8 | rt IV | Plug emboli | No | Alive | 16 |
| 9 | rt IV | Coil + plug emboli | No | Alive | 20 |
| 10 | rt IV | Coil + plug emboli | No | Dead | 3.5 |
| 11 | bi IV | Coil emboli | No | Dead | 5 |
| 12 | bi IV | Coil + plug emboli | No | Alive | 16.5 |
| 13 | lt IV | None | No | Dead | 7 |
| 14 | rt IV | None | Yes | Alive | 42 |
| 15 | rt IV; lt II | None | Yes | Dead (in‐hospital) | – |
The cerebral infarction seen in cases 14 and 15 had already occurred before arrival at the hospital. bi, bilateral; CI, cerebral infarction; Coil emboli, coil embolization; IVR, interventional radiology; lt, left; rt, right; VAI, vertebral artery injury.
Fig. 3DSA and MRA results from case 12. (A, B) DSA of right and left subclavian arteries reveals bilateral vertebral artery occlusion. (C) Left external carotid artery injection shows flow in the left vertebral artery to basilar artery through collateral circulation. (D) DSA of bilateral vertebral artery embolization by coil and vascular plug (arrowheads). (E, F) Neck and head MRA images after bilateral vertebral artery embolization show normal blood flow in the intracranial posterior circulation. DSA, digital subtraction angiography; MRA, magnetic resonance angiography.