Literature DB >> 34406800

Comparative Evaluation of Assays for Broad Detection of Molecular Resistance Mechanisms in Enterobacterales Isolates.

J N Brazelton de Cardenas1, C D Garner2, Y Su3, L Tang3, R T Hayden1.   

Abstract

Rapid detection of antimicrobial resistance in both surveillance and diagnostic settings is still a major challenge for the clinical lab, compounded by the rapid evolution of antibiotic resistance mechanisms. This study compares four methods for the broad detection of antibiotic resistance genes in Enterobacterales isolates: two multiplex PCR assays (the Streck ARM-D beta-lactamase kit and the OpGen Acuitas AMR Gene Panel u5.47 (research use only [RUO]) and one microarray assay (the Check-MDR CT103XL assay), with whole-genome sequencing as a reference standard. A total of 65 Gram-negative bacterial isolates, from 56 patients, classified by phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) as showing resistance to beta-lactam antimicrobials (extended-spectrum beta-lactamase [ESBL] positive or resistance to third-generation cephalosporins or carbapenems) were included in the study. Overall concordance between the molecular assays and sequencing was high. While all three assays had similar performance, the OpGen Acuitas AMR assay had the highest overall percent concordance with sequencing results. The primary differences between the assays tested were the number and diversity of targets, ranging from 9 for Streck to 34 for OpGen. This study shows that commercially available PCR-based assays can provide accurate identification of antimicrobial resistance loci in clinically significant Gram-negative bacteria. Further studies are needed to determine the clinical diagnostic role and potential benefit of such methods.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AMR; AST; NGS; PCR; antimicrobial; antimicrobial resistance; microarray; sequencing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34406800      PMCID: PMC8525580          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01033-21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  30 in total

1.  Evaluation of the Check-Points Check MDR CT103 and CT103 XL Microarray Kits by Use of Preparatory Rapid Cell Lysis.

Authors:  Scott A Cunningham; Shawn Vasoo; Robin Patel
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Rapid Detection of KPC, NDM, and OXA-48-Like Carbapenemases by Real-Time PCR from Rectal Swab Surveillance Samples.

Authors:  Tracy D Lee; Kathleen Adie; Alan McNabb; Dale Purych; Kulvinder Mannan; Robert Azana; Corrinne Ng; Patrick Tang; Linda M N Hoang
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  Clinical relevance of the ESKAPE pathogens.

Authors:  Jack N Pendleton; Sean P Gorman; Brendan F Gilmore
Journal:  Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.091

Review 4.  Past and Present Perspectives on β-Lactamases.

Authors:  Karen Bush
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Evaluation of a New Commercial Microarray Platform for the Simultaneous Detection of β-Lactamase and mcr-1 and mcr-2 Genes in Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  Odette J Bernasconi; Luigi Principe; Regula Tinguely; Aneta Karczmarek; Vincent Perreten; Francesco Luzzaro; Andrea Endimiani
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Epidemiology and characterisation of carbapenem-non-susceptible Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a large intensive care unit in Jakarta, Indonesia.

Authors:  Yulia Rosa Saharman; Andreu Coello Pelegrin; Anis Karuniawati; Rudyanto Sedono; Dita Aditianingsih; Wil H F Goessens; Corné H W Klaassen; Alex van Belkum; Caroline Mirande; Henri A Verbrugh; Juliëtte A Severin
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 5.283

Review 7.  Structure, Genetics and Worldwide Spread of New Delhi Metallo-β-lactamase (NDM): a threat to public health.

Authors:  Asad U Khan; Lubna Maryam; Raffaele Zarrilli
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 3.605

8.  Editorial: Beyond Antimicrobials: Non-traditional Approaches to Combating Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria.

Authors:  Natalia V Kirienko; Laurence Rahme; You-Hee Cho
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 5.293

9.  CARD 2020: antibiotic resistome surveillance with the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database.

Authors:  Brian P Alcock; Amogelang R Raphenya; Tammy T Y Lau; Kara K Tsang; Mégane Bouchard; Arman Edalatmand; William Huynh; Anna-Lisa V Nguyen; Annie A Cheng; Sihan Liu; Sally Y Min; Anatoly Miroshnichenko; Hiu-Ki Tran; Rafik E Werfalli; Jalees A Nasir; Martins Oloni; David J Speicher; Alexandra Florescu; Bhavya Singh; Mateusz Faltyn; Anastasia Hernandez-Koutoucheva; Arjun N Sharma; Emily Bordeleau; Andrew C Pawlowski; Haley L Zubyk; Damion Dooley; Emma Griffiths; Finlay Maguire; Geoff L Winsor; Robert G Beiko; Fiona S L Brinkman; William W L Hsiao; Gary V Domselaar; Andrew G McArthur
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Large-scale assessment of antimicrobial resistance marker databases for genetic phenotype prediction: a systematic review.

Authors:  Norhan Mahfouz; Inês Ferreira; Stephan Beisken; Arndt von Haeseler; Andreas E Posch
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 5.790

View more
  1 in total

1.  Multicenter Evaluation of the Acuitas AMR Gene Panel for Detection of an Extended Panel of Antimicrobial Resistance Genes among Bacterial Isolates.

Authors:  Patricia J Simner; Kimberlee A Musser; Kara Mitchell; Mark G Wise; Shawna Lewis; Rebecca Yee; Yehudit Bergman; Caryn E Good; Ayman M Abdelhamed; Henry Li; Erin M Laseman; Dan Sahm; Kelsey Pitzer; Julia Quan; G Terrance Walker; Michael R Jacobs; Daniel D Rhoads
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 11.677

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.