Literature DB >> 35138924

Multicenter Evaluation of the Acuitas AMR Gene Panel for Detection of an Extended Panel of Antimicrobial Resistance Genes among Bacterial Isolates.

Patricia J Simner1, Kimberlee A Musser2, Kara Mitchell2, Mark G Wise3, Shawna Lewis1, Rebecca Yee4, Yehudit Bergman1, Caryn E Good5, Ayman M Abdelhamed5, Henry Li3, Erin M Laseman3, Dan Sahm3, Kelsey Pitzer6, Julia Quan6, G Terrance Walker6, Michael R Jacobs5, Daniel D Rhoads7.   

Abstract

The Acuitas antimicrobial resistance (AMR) gene panel is a qualitative, multiplex, nucleic acid-based in vitro diagnostic test for the detection and differentiation of 28 antimicrobial resistance markers associated with not susceptible results (NS; i.e., intermediate or resistant) to one or more antimicrobial agents among cultured isolates of select Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterococcus faecalis. This study was conducted at four sites and included testing of 1,224 deidentified stocks created from 584 retrospectively collected isolates and 83 prospectively collected clinical isolates. The Acuitas results were compared with a combined reference standard including whole-genome sequencing, organism identification, and phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing. The positive percent agreement (PPA) for FDA-cleared AMR targets ranged from 94.4% for MCR-1 to 100% for armA, CTX-M-2, DHA, IMP, OXA-9, SHV, vanA, and VEB. The negative percent agreement (NPA) for the majority of targets was ≥99%, except for AAC, AAD, CMY-41, P. aeruginosa gyrA mutant, Sul1, Sul2, and TEM targets (range, 96.5% to 98.5%). Three AMR markers did not meet FDA inclusion criteria (GES, SPM, and MCR-2). For each organism, 1 to 22 AMR targets met the minimum reportable PPA/NPA and correlated with ≥80% positive predictive value with associated NS results for at least one agent (i.e., the probability of an organism carrying an AMR marker testing NS to the associated agent). We demonstrate that the Acuitas AMR gene panel is an accurate method to detect a broad array of AMR markers among cultured isolates. The AMR markers were further associated with expected NS results for specific agent-organism combinations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  antimicrobial resistance; antimicrobial stewardship; bacterial isolates; diagnostics; infection control; molecular methods

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35138924      PMCID: PMC8925887          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02098-21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   11.677


  22 in total

1.  Performance of the Verigene Gram-positive blood culture assay for direct detection of Gram-positive organisms and resistance markers in a pediatric hospital.

Authors:  Javier Mestas; Claudia M Polanco; Susanna Felsenstein; Jennifer Dien Bard
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Randomized Trial of Rapid Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction-Based Blood Culture Identification and Susceptibility Testing.

Authors:  Ritu Banerjee; Christine B Teng; Scott A Cunningham; Sherry M Ihde; James M Steckelberg; James P Moriarty; Nilay D Shah; Jayawant N Mandrekar; Robin Patel
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 3.  The Genotype-to-Phenotype Dilemma: How Should Laboratories Approach Discordant Susceptibility Results?

Authors:  Rebecca Yee; Jennifer Dien Bard; Patricia J Simner
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  National Estimates of Healthcare Costs Associated With Multidrug-Resistant Bacterial Infections Among Hospitalized Patients in the United States.

Authors:  Richard E Nelson; Kelly M Hatfield; Hannah Wolford; Matthew H Samore; R Douglas Scott; Sujan C Reddy; Babatunde Olubajo; Prabasaj Paul; John A Jernigan; James Baggs
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 9.079

5.  Re-estimating annual deaths due to multidrug-resistant organism infections.

Authors:  Jason P Burnham; Margaret A Olsen; Marin H Kollef
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 3.254

6.  Sustained impact of a rapid microarray-based assay with antimicrobial stewardship interventions on optimizing therapy in patients with Gram-positive bacteraemia.

Authors:  Edina Avdic; Ruibin Wang; David X Li; Pranita D Tamma; Stephanie E Shulder; Karen C Carroll; Sara E Cosgrove
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 5.790

7.  Identification of acquired antimicrobial resistance genes.

Authors:  Ea Zankari; Henrik Hasman; Salvatore Cosentino; Martin Vestergaard; Simon Rasmussen; Ole Lund; Frank M Aarestrup; Mette Voldby Larsen
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 5.790

8.  High Interlaboratory Reproducibility and Accuracy of Next-Generation-Sequencing-Based Bacterial Genotyping in a Ring Trial.

Authors:  Alexander Mellmann; Paal Skytt Andersen; Stefan Bletz; Alexander W Friedrich; Thomas A Kohl; Berit Lilje; Stefan Niemann; Karola Prior; John W Rossen; Dag Harmsen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Real-World Impact of the Accelerate PhenoTest BC Kit on Patients With Bloodstream Infections in the Improving Outcomes and Antimicrobial Stewardship Study: A Quasiexperimental Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Amira A Bhalodi; Shawn H MacVane; Bradley Ford; Dilek Ince; Patrick M Kinn; Kelly M Percival; Derek N Bremmer; Dustin R Carr; Thomas L Walsh; Micah M Bhatti; Samuel A Shelburne; Romney M Humphries; Kaleb Wolfe; Eric R Rosenbaum; Ryan K Dare; Johann Kolev; Meghan Madhusudhan; Michael A Ben-Aderet; Margie A Morgan
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 20.999

10.  Why Can't We Just Use PCR? The Role of Genotypic versus Phenotypic Testing for Antimicrobial Resistance Testing.

Authors:  Jennifer Dien Bard; Francesca Lee
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Newsl       Date:  2018-05-22
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: A Comprehensive Review of Currently Used Methods.

Authors:  Ina Gajic; Jovana Kabic; Dusan Kekic; Milos Jovicevic; Marina Milenkovic; Dragana Mitic Culafic; Anika Trudic; Lazar Ranin; Natasa Opavski
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-23
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.