Literature DB >> 34402585

Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on oncology screenings: it is time to change course.

M Scioscia1, M Noventa2, S Palomba3, A S Laganà4.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34402585      PMCID: PMC8441746          DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16857

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   7.331


× No keyword cloud information.
Sir, We have found that the COVID‐19 pandemic has had a significant negative effect on oncology screenings. Although this issue is well known to clinicians, the actual impact is less clear. In most countries, national health services offer cancer screening programmes for breast, colon and cervical cancer. These secondary prevention measures are considered an integral part of treatment in oncology. Although cancer treatment has been guaranteed during the COVID‐19 pandemic, screenings have been suspended and/or severely reduced worldwide during the first and second waves due to the reprioritisation of health services, as was clearly highlighted by Meggetto et al. In a report about a cervical screening programme in Ontario, recent data on the effect of screening discontinuation during the first wave demonstrated increased delays in cancer diagnosis and treatment. Notably, population‐based studies reported a 30% reduction in primary care consultations and a 12–15% reduction in the number of referrals for both colorectal and breast cancer, with a significant increase in more advanced stages of disease compared with the same period in 2019. , National data in Italy showed a significant reduction in the number of screening tests performed between January and September 2020 compared with the same months in 2019 (Table 1). This was due to the suspension of booked screenings and also to a reduction in adherence to screenings, probably as a consequence of fear of COVID‐19 (−17%, −21% and −20% for cervical, breast and colorectal cancer, respectively). Although we can justify the decrease in the number of tests (between 54% and 58%) during the first wave of the pandemic (January to May), the second period assessed before the second wave (June to September) still showed a significant reduction (between 28% and 46%) in adherence to screening. This led to a cumulative delay of an estimated 4 months or more, more than 6300 missed diagnoses of cervical, breast and colorectal cancer and 6600 precancerous colorectal lesions. Similar data may be expected during the second wave of the pandemic, increasing delay and missed diagnoses.
Table 1

Comparison of oncology screenings in Italy between 2019 and 2020

Cervical cancer screeningBreast cancer screeningColon cancer screening
Booked (n, %)
Jan–May

−697 630

(−41.3%)

−686 498

(−41.6%)

−1 273 885

(−47.3%)

Jun–Sept

−465 212

(−39.5%)

−260 824

(−23.8%)

−633 904

(−34.2%)

Total

−1 162 842

(−40.5%)

−947 322

(−34.5%)

−1 907 789

(−42.0%)

Performed (n, %)
Jan–May

−362 001

(−55.1%)

−454 625

(−53.6%)

−601 862

(−57.8%)

Jun–Sept

−178 704

(−39.4%)

−156 178

(−28.1%)

−365 603

(−46.1%)

Total

−540 705

(−48.8%)

−610 803

(−43.5%)

−967 465

(−52.7%)

Equivalent delay (months)
Jan–May−2.9−2.9−3.0
Jun–Sep−1.5−1.0−1.8
Total−4.4−3.9−4.7

Data were retrieved through the public database provided by the Italian National Screening Observatory (https://www.osservatorionazionalescreening.it/).

Data compared with those in 2019.

Comparison of oncology screenings in Italy between 2019 and 2020 −697 630 (−41.3%) −686 498 (−41.6%) −1 273 885 (−47.3%) −465 212 (−39.5%) −260 824 (−23.8%) −633 904 (−34.2%) −1 162 842 (−40.5%) −947 322 (−34.5%) −1 907 789 (−42.0%) −362 001 (−55.1%) −454 625 (−53.6%) −601 862 (−57.8%) −178 704 (−39.4%) −156 178 (−28.1%) −365 603 (−46.1%) −540 705 (−48.8%) −610 803 (−43.5%) −967 465 (−52.7%) Data were retrieved through the public database provided by the Italian National Screening Observatory (https://www.osservatorionazionalescreening.it/). Data compared with those in 2019. The discontinuation of the programme during the second wave of the COVID‐19 pandemic may lead to a significant number of patients going undetected and untreated, thereby resulting in a further delay in diagnosing early stages of cancer. This may contribute to an increase in diagnoses of invasive cancer instead of precancerous lesions, and thus more advanced stages of the disease in the coming years. This would be accompanied by worse cancer prognoses and an increased need for more extensive treatments. According to recent data it is likely that the delay will not be rectified for many years. It is politically challenging to prioritise secondary prevention during this second wave of the pandemic. However, it is necessary to make up for lost time and to prevent catastrophic scenarios in the coming years.

Disclosures of interest

None declared. Completed disclosure of interests form available to view online as supporting information. Supplementary Material Click here for additional data file. Supplementary Material Click here for additional data file. Supplementary Material Click here for additional data file. Supplementary Material Click here for additional data file.
  5 in total

1.  Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on oncology screenings: it is time to change course.

Authors:  M Scioscia; M Noventa; S Palomba; A S Laganà
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 7.331

2.  The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Ontario Cervical Screening Program, colposcopy and treatment services in Ontario, Canada: a population-based study.

Authors:  O Meggetto; N Jembere; J Gao; M J Walker; M Rey; L Rabeneck; K J Murphy; R Kupets
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 7.331

3.  Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the symptomatic diagnosis of cancer: the view from primary care.

Authors:  Daniel Jones; Richard D Neal; Sean R G Duffy; Suzanne E Scott; Katriina L Whitaker; Kate Brain
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 41.316

4.  Two-month stop in mammographic screening significantly impacts on breast cancer stage at diagnosis and upfront treatment in the COVID era.

Authors:  A Toss; C Isca; M Venturelli; C Nasso; G Ficarra; V Bellelli; C Armocida; E Barbieri; L Cortesi; L Moscetti; F Piacentini; C Omarini; A Andreotti; A Gambini; R Battista; M Dominici; G Tazzioli
Journal:  ESMO Open       Date:  2021-02-11

5.  Delays and Disruptions in Cancer Health Care Due to COVID-19 Pandemic: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Rachel Riera; Ângela Maria Bagattini; Rafael Leite Pacheco; Daniela Vianna Pachito; Felipe Roitberg; Andre Ilbawi
Journal:  JCO Glob Oncol       Date:  2021-02
  5 in total
  4 in total

1.  New Advances in Cervical Cancer: From Bench to Bedside.

Authors:  Ottavia D'Oria; Giacomo Corrado; Antonio Simone Laganà; Vito Chiantera; Enrico Vizza; Andrea Giannini
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 4.614

2.  Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on oncology screenings: it is time to change course.

Authors:  M Scioscia; M Noventa; S Palomba; A S Laganà
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 7.331

3.  COVID-19 outbreak in Lombardy: Impact on reducing solid cancer diagnoses in 2020.

Authors:  Annalisa Trama; Alice Bernasconi; Laura Botta; Serena Di Cosimo; Rosalba Miceli; Melanie Claps; Fabio Badenchini; Roberto Lillini; Massimiliano Rubino; Paolo Lasalvia
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 7.316

4.  Mitochondrial hijacking: a potential mechanism for SARS-CoV-2 to impair female fertility.

Authors:  Jun Sun; Qiong Liu; Xinling Zhang; Shu Dun; Li Liu
Journal:  Med Hypotheses       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 1.538

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.