Literature DB >> 3440098

Disopyramide pharmacokinetics and metabolism: effect of inducers.

R P Kapil1, J E Axelson, I L Mansfield, D J Edwards, B McErlane, M A Mason, D Lalka, C R Kerr.   

Abstract

1. The disposition of orally administered disopyramide was studied in a population of smokers (n = 6) and non-smokers (n = 8) before and during phenobarbitone treatment (100 mg daily for 21 days; Cp 21st day = 13.9 +/- 2.0 micrograms ml-1). The comparative inducibility of these populations by phenobarbitone was assessed as was the inductive effect of cigarette smoking, per se. Furthermore, the determinants of the intensity of the inductive effect were examined, as well as the effect of the barbiturate on the binding of disopyramide to alpha 1-acid glycoprotein (AGP). 2. Smokers and non-smokers exhibited similar half-lives (6.48 +/- 1.49 vs 6.66 +/- 1.02 h), apparent total body clearances (0.100 +/- 0.020 vs 0.117 +/- 0.034 l h-1 kg-1), mean renal clearances (0.043 +/- 0.0093 vs 0.057 +/- 0.013 l h-1 kg-1) and apparent intrinsic metabolic clearances (0.057 +/- 0.015 vs 0.060 +/- 0.024 l h-1 kg-1) before phenobarbitone treatment. 3. Both populations responded comparably to barbiturate exposure in that apparent intrinsic metabolic clearance more than doubled. Interestingly, the magnitude of this increase was highly dependent on the observed baseline apparent intrinsic metabolic clearance, (r' = 0.81; P less than 0.001). 4. Phenobarbitone treatment of non-smokers resulted in an increase in the AUC of the active metabolite N-despropyl disopyramide (MND), but not significantly (3.8 +/- 1.6 vs 4.1 +/- 2.3 micrograms ml-1 h). Similar results were observed in smokers (3.5 +/- 1.4 vs 3.9 +/- 2.0 micrograms ml-1 h, respectively). 5. The percent of administered dose recovered in urine as disopyramide in non-smokers was significantly decreased upon phenobarbitone treatment (43 +/- 6% vs 25 +/- 5%), whereas the percent of dose recovered as MND increased significantly in this group (25 +/- 6% vs 31 +/- 5%). The population of smokers responded similarly. 6. At doses typically used to achieve hepatic microsomal enzyme induction in man, phenobarbitone treatment caused no significant change or trend towards a change in serum AGP concentrations as measured using the radial immunodiffusion method in nonsmokers (67.4 +/- 19.9 mg dl-1 vs 68.0 +/- 40.7 mg dl-1) or smokers (64.5 +/- 15.7 vs 67.9 +/- 14.9). Similarly, when AGP concentration was estimated in serum from non-smokers using a nephelometric method no effect attributable to phenobarbitone was observed (47.9 +/- 1.3 vs 47.9 +/- 16.8 mg dl-1). Consistent with this observation, disopyramide free fraction was not affected by barbiturate treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3440098      PMCID: PMC1386404          DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1987.tb03246.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  18 in total

1.  Effect of pentobarbital on the disposition of alprenolol.

Authors:  G Alván; K Piafsky; M Lind; C von Bahr
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 6.875

2.  Effect of smoking on theophylline disposition.

Authors:  S N Hunt; W J Jusko; A M Yurchak
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 6.875

3.  Role of concentration-dependent plasma protein binding in disopyramide disposition.

Authors:  P J Meffin; E W Robert; R A Winkle; S Harapat; F A Peters; D C Harrison
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1979-02

4.  Effect of altered disopyramide binding on its pharmacologic response in rabbits.

Authors:  J D Huang; S Oie
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 4.030

Review 5.  Pharmacokinetic interactions with antiepileptic drugs.

Authors:  E Perucca
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1982 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  Disopyramide: serum level and arrhythmia conversion.

Authors:  A P Niarchos
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 4.749

7.  Lignocaine disposition in blood in epilepsy.

Authors:  P A Routledge; W W Stargel; A L Finn; A Barchowsky; D G Shand
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 4.335

8.  Interactions of phenobarbital with propranolol in the dog. 1. Plasma protein binding.

Authors:  S A Bai; F P Abramson
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 4.030

9.  Increased binding of desmethylimipramine in plasma of phenobarbital-treated rats.

Authors:  M Brinkschulte; U Breyer-Pfaff
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  1982-05-01       Impact factor: 5.858

10.  Enzyme immunoassay of disopyramide in serum.

Authors:  B E Pape
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 8.327

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Therapeutic drug monitoring in saliva. An update.

Authors:  R K Drobitch; C K Svensson
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  Antiarrhythmic agents: drug interactions of clinical significance.

Authors:  T C Trujillo; P E Nolan
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 3.  Poisoning due to class IA antiarrhythmic drugs. Quinidine, procainamide and disopyramide.

Authors:  S Y Kim; N L Benowitz
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1990 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.606

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.