| Literature DB >> 34400878 |
Jia-Ying Wei1, Zhou Xu1,2, Hao Li1, Wen-Qin Du3, Bai-Ling Niu4, Shu Li1, Shen Tian1, Juan Wu1, Yu-Ling Chen1, Xin Li1, Zi-Li Liu1, Jun Xiao1, Guo-Sheng Ren1, Liang Ran5, Ling-Quan Kong1.
Abstract
Objectives: To determine the relationship between the endometrial thickness (ET) and metabolic associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) in the postmenopausal women who have a comprehensive health examination.Entities:
Keywords: Metabolic associated fatty liver disease; body mass index; endometrial thickness; postmenopausal women; ultrasonography
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34400878 PMCID: PMC8364468 DOI: 10.7150/ijms.60780
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Med Sci ISSN: 1449-1907 Impact factor: 3.738
Figure 1Flow chart of study participants. A total of 50897 women participated in this study of whom 8594 were postmenopausal. Among the postmenopausal women, 381 (4.4%) had an ET greater than or equal to 5 mm, of whom 137 (36.0%) presented with fatty liver based on transabdominal ultrasonography and 133 (34.9%) presented with MAFLD.
Figure 2The diagnostic criteria of MAFLD. The diagnostic criteria of MAFLD are based on evidence of hepatic steatosis, one of the following three criteria, namely overweight/obesity, presence of type 2 diabetes mellitus, or evidence of metabolic dysregulation3 which was defined as having at least two of the following; (1) waist circumference ≥ 90 cm (Asian male), ≥ 80 cm (Asian female), (2) triglyceride ≥1.70 mmol/L (or treated for dyslipidemia), (3) high-density lipoprotein (HDL) < 1.0 mmol/L (male), < 1.3 mmol/L (female) (or treated for dyslipidemia), (4) blood pressure ≥ 130/85 mmHg (or treated for hypertension), (5) fasting plasma glucose 5.6 to 6.9 mmol/L or 2-h OGTT (1-h 75-g-oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) 7.8 mmol/L or HbA1c 5.7% to 6.4%, (6) serum/plasma high-sensitivity C reactive protein level >2 mg/L, (7) homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) 2 was calculated to estimate insulin sensitivity and insulin resistance ≥2.5.
Figure 3The predicted probability of metabolic associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) and ultrasound based fatty liver disease. (A) The Endometrial thickness predicting the presence of Metabolic associated fatty liver disease were examined by the R. (B) The Endometrial thickness predicting the presence of Ultrasonic fatty liver were examined by the R. (C-D) The Endometrial thickness and age predicting the presence of FLD were examined by the R.
Characteristics of women included in the study (n=8594) by endometrial thicknessa
| Endometrial thickness (n=8594) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| <5 mm (n=8213) | ≥5 mm (n=381) | ||
|
| |||
| Age, y | 63. 55 [6.70] | 62.30 [6.76] | <0.001 |
| Height, cm | 154.27[5.64] | 155.21 [6.06] | 0.005 |
|
| |||
| BMI | 23.55 [3.03] | 24.34 [3.05] | <0.001 |
| Underweight <18.5 | 272(3.3%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0.001 |
| Average18.5~22.9 | 3459 (42.1%) | 481 (18.1%) | |
| Overweight ≥23~24.9 | 2080 (25.3%) | 738 (27.7%) | |
| Obese I ≥25~29.9 | 2194 (26.7%) | 1265 (47.5%) | |
| Obese II ≥30 | 208 (2.5%) | 179 (6.7%) | |
|
| |||
|
| |||
| Waist, cm | 79.85 [7.89] | 81.74 [7.85] | <0.001 |
| Normal | 3982 (48.5%) | 135 (35.4%) | <0.001 |
| Elevated ≥ 80 cm | 4231 (51.5%) | 246 (64.6%) | |
|
| |||
| SBP, mmHg | 133.25 [19.86] | 135.07 [20.68] | 0.091 |
| DBP, mmHg | 76.48 [11.05] | 77.40 [12.34] | 0.249 |
| Normal | 3603 (43.9%) | 156 (40.9%) | 0.261 |
| Elevated ≥130/85 mmHg | 4610 (56.1%) | 225 (59.1%) | |
|
| |||
| Triglycerides, mmol/L | 1.64 [1.15] | 1.60 [0.80] | 0.671 |
| Normal | 5484 (66.8%) | 247 (64.8%) | 0.432 |
| Elevated ≥1.7 mmol/L | 2729 (33.2%) | 134 (35.2%) | |
|
| |||
| HDL-C, mmol/L | 1.61 [0.37] | 1.56 [0.34] | 0.017 |
| Normal | 6630 (80.7%) | 289 (75.9%) | 0.019 |
| Reduced <1.3 mmol/L | 1583 (19.3%) | 92 (24.1%) | |
|
| |||
| Fasting glucose, mmol/L | 5.76 [1.35] | 5.81 [1.34] | 0.522 |
| Normal <5.6 mmol/L | 4625 (56.3%) | 205 (53.8%) | 0.492 |
| Elevated 5.6~6.9 mmol/L | 2849 (34.7%) | 136 (35.7%) | |
| Type 2 diabetes >6.9 mmol/L | 739 (9.0%) | 40 (10.5%) | |
a. Values are given as mean [std. deviation] and number (percentage).
b. Some P values were compared using Kruskal-Wallis tests. Other variables were derived from χ2 tests.
c. Cut-off values of body mass index were defined as follows: underweight <18.5; average18.5~22.9; overweight ≥23~24.9; obese I ≥25~29.9; obese II ≥30.
d. Cut-off values of metabolic components were defined as follows: waist circumference ≥80 cm; systolic blood pressure ≥130 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure ≥85 mm Hg; triglycerides ≥1.7 mmol/L; HDL cholesterol < 1.3 mmol/L; fasting glucose from 5.6 to 6.9 mmol/L.
The risk of metabolic associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) and ultrasound-based fatty liver disease in relation to endometrial thicknessa
| Endometrial thickness/mm | Liver status | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total (n=8594) | Model 1 | Model 2 | |||
| Ultrasonic fatty liverb (-) (n=5931) | Ultrasonic fatty liver (+) (n=2663) | MAFLDc (-) (n=6051) | MAFLD (+) (n=2543) | ||
| <3 | 4720 (54.9%) | 3303 (70.0%) |
| 3368(71.4%) |
|
| 3≤ET<5 | 3493 (40.6%) | 2384 (68.3%) |
| 2435(69.7%) |
|
| ≥5 | 381 (4.4%) | 244 (64.0%) |
| 248(65.1%) |
|
a. Data are given as a number (%).
b. Ultrasonic fatty liver means fatty liver disease diagnosed by abdominal or gynecological ultrasonography.
c. MAFLD means metabolic associated with fatty liver disease.
The odds ratio for metabolic associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) and ultrasound-based fatty liver disease in relation to endometrial thickness
| Endometrial thickness/mm | Liver status | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total (n=8594) | Model 1 | Model 2 | |||
| Ultrasonic fatty liver (+) (n=2663) | MAFLD (+) (n=2543) | ||||
| Number (%) | OR (95%CI)a | P value | OR (95%CI)b | P value | |
| <5 | 8213 (95.6%) | 1 (Reference) | 0.032 | 1 (Reference) | 0.020 |
| ≥5 | 381 (4.4%) |
|
| ||
a. OR: odds ratio; 95%CI: 95% confidence interval.
b. The odds ratio of fatty liver disease is adjusting for nothing.
Binary logistic regression analysis for metabolic associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) and ultrasound-based fatty liver disease in relation to endometrial thickness
| Liver status | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ultrasonic fatty livera (+) (n=2663) | MAFLD (+) (n=2543) | |||
| OR (95%CI) b | Ptrend | OR (95%CI) | Ptrend | |
|
| ||||
| Endometrial thickness, mm |
| 0.003 |
| 0.002 |
| ET<3 mm | 1 (Reference) | 0.025 | 1 (Reference) | 0.018 |
| 3 mm ≤ ET < 5 mm | 1.084 (0.986-1.192) | 0.093 | 1.082 (0.983-1.191) | 0.106 |
| ET ≥ 5mm |
| 0.016 |
| 0.010 |
|
| ||||
| Agec, y | 1.015 (1.008-1.022) | <0.001 | 1.018 (1.012-1.025) | <0.001 |
| Endometrial thickness, mm |
| 0.001 |
| <0.001 |
| ET <3 mm | 1 (Reference) | 0.008 | 1 (Reference) | 0.004 |
| 3 mm ≤ET< 5 mm |
| 0.036 |
| 0.034 |
| ET ≥ 5 mm |
| 0.008 |
| 0.004 |
a. Ultrasonic fatty liver means fatty liver disease diagnosed by abdominal or gynecological ultrasonography.
b. The odds ratio of fatty liver disease is adjusting for age.
c. In models, age and endometrial thickness were treated as a continuous variable.
Multivariable adjusted analysis for BMI in relation to endometrial thickness
| Endometrial thickness, mmb | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3mm ≤ ET < 5 mm | ET ≥ 5 mm | |||
| OR (95%CI) | Ptrend | OR (95%CI) | Ptrend | |
| Age, y | 1.050 (1.032-1.068) | < 0.001 | 1.016 (0.998-1.035) | 0.073 |
|
| ||||
| Average, 18.5≤BMI≤22.9 | 1.337 (0.756-2.366) | 0.318 | 1.192 (0.671-2.118) | 0.549 |
| Overweight, BMI≥23~24.9 |
|
| 1.430 (0.798-2.563) | 0.230 |
| Obese I, BMI≥25~29.9 |
|
|
|
|
| Obese II, BMI≥30 |
|
|
|
|
a. The body mass index is divided into 5 groups according to Asian BMI classification.
b. Underweight BMI<18.5: 1 (Reference).