Literature DB >> 34400154

Self-removal of long-acting reversible contraception: A content analysis of YouTube videos.

Kathleen Broussard1, Andréa Becker2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore publicly available information about the self-removal of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) on a popular video-sharing website. STUDY
DESIGN: We conducted a comprehensive keyword search of YouTube videos related to self-removal of LARC-namely intrauterine devices and implants. We analyzed video content to explore demographic characteristics, method and duration of LARC use, and motivations and experiences of self-removal.
RESULTS: Our keyword search identified 58 videos that met the criteria for inclusion, including 48 videos that featured individuals who removed an intrauterine device and 10 who removed an implant. Collectively, videos had over 4 million views. We identified most video creators as white (53%), 31% as Black, and 14% as Latinx. Users were motivated to remove their own device by both preferences and barriers to formal care. Most individuals in our sample (n = 56/58) successfully removed their device and described their experience in positive terms related to the ease of removal. Reasons for LARC discontinuation included negative side effects, fear of potential side effects, and desire for pregnancy.
CONCLUSION: This study builds upon prior research by describing publicly available information about LARC self-removal. The over representation of Black women in our sample may reflect a higher prevalence of LARC self-removal among this population. Positive experiences of self-removal and high levels of viewer engagement with online videos suggest a need for provider counseling on LARC removal at the time of insertion. IMPLICATIONS: Prior to LARC insertion, patients should be made aware of any financial requirements for discontinuation. Provider counseling for self-removal at the time of insertion will likely minimize health risks and affirm patient reproductive autonomy.
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contraceptive attitudes; Discontinuation; IUD; Implant; Online; Self-removal

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34400154      PMCID: PMC8592268          DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.08.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.051


  24 in total

1.  An assessment of the quality of information available on the internet about the IUD and the potential impact on contraceptive choices.

Authors:  Eve Weiss; Kirsten Moore
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.375

2.  Provider Bias in Long-Acting Reversible Contraception (LARC) Promotion and Removal: Perceptions of Young Adult Women.

Authors:  Jenny A Higgins; Renee D Kramer; Kristin M Ryder
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Do racial and ethnic differences in contraceptive attitudes and knowledge explain disparities in method use?

Authors:  Corinne H Rocca; Cynthia C Harper
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2012-06-26

4.  Social media and the intrauterine device: a YouTube content analysis.

Authors:  Brian T Nguyen; Allison J Allen
Journal:  BMJ Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2017-11-23

5.  Conspiracy beliefs about birth control: barriers to pregnancy prevention among African Americans of reproductive age.

Authors:  Sheryl Thorburn; Laura M Bogart
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2005-08

6.  Women or LARC first? Reproductive autonomy and the promotion of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods.

Authors:  Anu Manchikanti Gomez; Liza Fuentes; Amy Allina
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2014-05-23

7.  Human papillomavirus vaccination coverage on YouTube.

Authors:  Kevin A Ache; Lorraine S Wallace
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2008-08-03       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 8.  An evaluation of the quality of online information on emergency contraception.

Authors:  Simrita Agrawal; Ciara Irwin; Rima K Dhillon-Smith
Journal:  Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 1.848

9.  Contraceptive method use in the United States: trends and characteristics between 2008, 2012 and 2014.

Authors:  Megan L Kavanaugh; Jenna Jerman
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 3.375

10.  What are people looking for when they Google "self-abortion"?

Authors:  Jenna Jerman; Tsuyoshi Onda; Rachel K Jones
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 3.375

View more
  4 in total

1.  Developing an intrauterine device self-removal guide: a mixed methods qualitative and small pilot study.

Authors:  Francesca Collins; Kelly Gilmore; Kelsey A Petrie; Lyndsey S Benson
Journal:  Contracept Reprod Med       Date:  2022-07-01

2.  Society of Family Planning Clinical Recommendations: Contraceptive Care in the Context of Pandemic Response.

Authors:  Bianca M Stifani; Tessa Madden; Elizabeth Micks; Ghazaleh Moayedi; Jessica Tarleton; Lyndsey S Benson
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  IUD self-removal as self-care: Research is needed in low and middle-income countries.

Authors:  Alice F Cartwright; Amelia C L Mackenzie; Rebecca L Callahan; M Valeria Bahamondes; Laneta J Dorflinger
Journal:  Front Glob Womens Health       Date:  2022-09-07

4.  Intrauterine device self-removal practices during the COVID-19 pandemic among family planning clinics.

Authors:  Kathryn E Fay; Fadila Traore; Jennifer R Amico
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2022-10-12       Impact factor: 3.051

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.