Literature DB >> 34398865

Premature Fusion of the Sagittal Suture as an Incidental Radiographic Finding in Young Children.

Monica Manrique1, Esperanza Mantilla-Rivas1, Antonio R Porras Perez1, Justin R Bryant1, Md Sohel Rana1, Liyun Tu1, Robert F Keating1, Albert K Oh1, Marius G Linguraru1, Gary F Rogers1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Craniosynostosis typically develops prenatally and creates characteristic changes in craniofacial form. Nevertheless, postnatal forms of craniosynostosis have been described. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of incidentally identified, but temporally premature, cranial suture fusion in normocephalic children.
METHODS: Computed tomographic scans obtained from children aged 1 to 5 years evaluated in the authors' emergency department between 2005 and 2016 were reviewed for evidence of craniosynostosis. Patients with prior ventriculoperitoneal shunt, brain or cranial abnormality, or known syndromes were excluded. The presence of craniosynostosis and cranial index was assessed by a panel of three craniofacial surgeons and one pediatric neurosurgeon. Demographic information, fusion type, reason for the computed tomographic scan, and medical history were recorded as covariates. Cranial shape and intracranial volume were calculated using a previously validated automated system.
RESULTS: Three hundred thirty-one patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 2.4 ± 1.3 years. Eleven patients (3.3 percent) were found to have a complete (n = 9) or partial (n = 2) fusion of the sagittal suture. All patients had a normal cranial index (0.80; range, 0.72 to 0.87) and a grossly normal head shape. Only two fusions (18.2 percent) were documented by the radiologist. Cranial shape analysis performed in five of the 11 patients showed subtle phenotypic changes along the scaphocephaly spectrum in four patients, with a normal shape in the remaining case.
CONCLUSIONS: Sagittal fusion is present in 3.3 percent of otherwise phenotypically normal children aged 1 to 5 years. The clinical significance of this result is unclear, but routine screening of affected patients is paramount. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, IV.
Copyright © 2021 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34398865      PMCID: PMC8458241          DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000008332

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   5.169


  46 in total

1.  Cranial suture response to stress: expression patterns of Noggin and Runx2.

Authors:  Justin B Heller; Joubin S Gabbay; Kristy Wasson; Scott Mitchell; Misha M Heller; Patricia Zuk; James P Bradley
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  A secondary craniosynostosis associated with juvenile hyperthyroidism.

Authors:  Takuya Higashino; Shinichi Hirabayashi
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  Multiple-suture synostosis subsequent to ventricular shunting.

Authors:  S A Schendel; L M Shuer
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  Craniosynostosis Following Fetal Methotrexate Exposure.

Authors:  Christopher S Zarella; Frank P Albino; Albert K Oh; Benjamin C Wood; Chima O Oluigbo; John S Myseros; Suresh N Magge; Robert F Keating; Gary F Rogers
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.046

5.  Radiation-free quantification of head malformations in craniosynostosis patients from 3D photography.

Authors:  Liyun Tu; Antonio R Porras; Albert Oh; Natasha Lepore; Manuel Mastromanolis; Deki Tsering; Beatriz Paniagua; Andinet Enquobahrie; Robert Keating; Gary F Rogers; Marius George Linguraru
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2018-02-27

6.  Force-induced craniosynostosis in the murine sagittal suture.

Authors:  Adam J Oppenheimer; Samuel T Rhee; Steven A Goldstein; Steven R Buchman
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 7.  Cranial sutures: a brief review.

Authors:  Bethany J Slater; Kelly A Lenton; Matthew D Kwan; Deepak M Gupta; Derrick C Wan; Michael T Longaker
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  Increased risk of craniosynostosis with maternal cigarette smoking during pregnancy.

Authors:  B W Alderman; C M Bradley; C Greene; S K Fernbach; A E Barón
Journal:  Teratology       Date:  1994-07

9.  Visual evoked responses as a monitor of intracranial pressure during hyperosmolar blood-brain barrier disruption.

Authors:  M K Gumerlock; D York; D Durkis
Journal:  Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien)       Date:  1994

10.  The intracranial pressure of the patients with mild form of craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Takayuki Inagaki; Shigeo Kyutoku; Takatoshi Seno; Takuya Kawaguchi; Takashi Yamahara; Hideyuki Oshige; Yasuo Yamanouchi; Keiji Kawamoto
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2007-08-07       Impact factor: 1.475

View more
  1 in total

1.  Normocephalic sagittal craniosynostosis in young children is common and unrecognized.

Authors:  M Manrique; E Mantilla-Rivas; M S Rana; H Crowder; N Oh; A K Oh; R F Keating; G F Rogers
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2022-06-18       Impact factor: 1.532

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.