Literature DB >> 17519698

Cranial suture response to stress: expression patterns of Noggin and Runx2.

Justin B Heller1, Joubin S Gabbay, Kristy Wasson, Scott Mitchell, Misha M Heller, Patricia Zuk, James P Bradley.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Current theory on normal cranial suture fusion entrusts the dura with the regulatory role. Studies suggest that the dura responds to stress with changes in gene expression. Noggin (bone morphogenetic protein inhibitor) expression is decreased in normal (rat and mouse) cranial suture fusion, but its role in craniosynostosis and the response to stress has not been studied.
METHODS: Posterior frontal (fusing) and sagittal (patent) rat cranial sutures were held static, oscillated, or distracted for 10 days in an organ culture microdistraction device beginning at 5 days of age (n = 30 sutures, or 10 sutures per group). The percentage of fusion equaled the score received for bony closure. Noggin, Runx2, and alkaline phosphatase expression was localized by immunohistochemistry for all groups.
RESULTS: Both the posterior frontal and sagittal sutures demonstrated a significant (p < 0.05) increase in fusion percentage with oscillation relative to the static control. Noggin was not expressed in the fusing posterior frontal suture but was expressed in the normally patent sagittal suture. Conversely, Runx2 was expressed in the posterior frontal suture but not in the sagittal suture. However, when a mechanical stress was applied, both the posterior frontal and sagittal sutures expressed Runx2 but not Noggin, as in the static fusing suture.
CONCLUSIONS: The application of mechanical stress to cranial sutures results in fusion of both the posterior frontal suture and the normally patent sagittal suture. Runx2 is expressed but Noggin is not expressed. Thus, mechanical stress influences sutural fusion and may play a role in craniosynostosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17519698     DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000260589.75706.19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  6 in total

Review 1.  The role of vertebrate models in understanding craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Greg Holmes
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 2.  Suture Cells in a Mechanical Stretching Niche: Critical Contributors to Trans-sutural Distraction Osteogenesis.

Authors:  Wei Liang; Enzhe Zhao; Guan Li; Hongsen Bi; Zhenmin Zhao
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2021-11-21       Impact factor: 4.333

3.  Premature Fusion of the Sagittal Suture as an Incidental Radiographic Finding in Young Children.

Authors:  Monica Manrique; Esperanza Mantilla-Rivas; Antonio R Porras Perez; Justin R Bryant; Md Sohel Rana; Liyun Tu; Robert F Keating; Albert K Oh; Marius G Linguraru; Gary F Rogers
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 5.169

4.  Fetal constraint as a potential risk factor for craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Pedro A Sanchez-Lara; Suzan L Carmichael; John M Graham; Edward J Lammer; Gary M Shaw; Chen Ma; Sonja A Rasmussen
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.802

Review 5.  Signaling Mechanisms Underlying Genetic Pathophysiology of Craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Xiaowei Wu; Yan Gu
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 6.580

6.  Isolation and Characterization of Human Suture Mesenchymal Stem Cells In Vitro.

Authors:  Liangliang Kong; Yuan Wang; Yi Ji; Jianbing Chen; Jie Cui; Weimin Shen
Journal:  Int J Stem Cells       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 2.500

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.