| Literature DB >> 34396865 |
Ahmed A Naiem1, Robert James Doonan1, Oren K Steinmetz1, Kent S MacKenzie1, Elie Girsowicz2, Jason P Bayne2, Daniel I Obrand2, Heather L Gill1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to evaluate the outcomes of endovascular treatment in patients with moderate and severe claudication due to femoropopliteal disease, that is, disease of the superficial femoral and popliteal arteries.Entities:
Keywords: claudication; endovascular; outcomes; revascularization
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34396865 PMCID: PMC9485338 DOI: 10.1177/17085381211039668
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vascular ISSN: 1708-5381 Impact factor: 1.105
Figure 1.Results of retrospective review through 897 patients undergoing ER between January 2012–December 2017.
Characteristics of patients undergoing ET for intermittent claudication.
| Mean age in years, mean (SD) | 69.6 (9.8), range = 53–91 | |
| Sex, % ( | Male | 74.3% ( |
| Female | 25.7% ( | |
| Comorbidities, % ( | Hypertension | 74.3% ( |
| Diabetes mellitus | 35.1% ( | |
| History of smoking | 66.2% ( | |
| Dyslipidemia | 67.6% ( | |
| Coronary artery disease | 29.7% ( | |
| Stroke | 16.2% ( | |
| Chronic kidney disease | 1.2% ( | |
| Active or previous cancer | 14.9% ( | |
| Severe comorbidities
| 59.5% ( | |
| Rutherford classification, % ( | II | 3.6% ( |
| III | 96.4% ( | |
| Previous revascularization, % ( | Ipsilateral | 2.4% ( |
| Contralateral | 14.3% ( | |
| Medications, % ( | Antiplatelet | 68.9% ( |
| Statin | 64.9% ( | |
| Anti-hypertensive | 81.8% ( | |
| Anti-diabetic | 65.4% ( | |
| OMT
| 23.0% ( | |
aDefined as presence of three of the following: hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, coronary artery disease, and stroke.
bOMT: optimal medical therapy defined as use of antiplatelets, statin, and non-smoking.
Anatomical and ET procedure details.
| TASC II Classification, % ( | A | 29.8% ( |
| B | 46.4% ( | |
| C | 23.8% ( | |
| D | 0% | |
| Anatomy of lesions, % ( | Location | |
| Proximal SFA | 19% ( | |
| Mid SFA | 45.2% ( | |
| Distal SFA | 70.2% ( | |
| Above-knee popliteal | 16.7% ( | |
| Below-knee popliteal | 2.4% ( | |
| Infra-popliteal runoff, % ( | 3 vessels | 48.2% ( |
| 2 vessels | 37.3% ( | |
| 1 vessel | 14.1% ( | |
| Primary procedure type, % ( | Plain balloon angioplasty (PBA) | 95.2% ( |
| Drug-coated balloon (DCB) | 1.2% ( | |
| Stent | 3.6% ( | |
| Angiogram findings, % ( | Subintimal recanalization | 37.8% ( |
| Residual stenosis | 51.9% ( | |
| Vessel dissection | 38.8% ( | |
| Embolization | 3.8% ( | |
| Adjunct procedure required,% ( | 66.7% ( | |
| Adjunct procedure type, % ( | PBA | 21.4% ( |
| Stent | 76.8% ( | |
| Others
| 1.8% ( | |
| Mean stent length used in mm, mean (range) | 162.8 ± 81.1 (37–350) | |
| Closure device success, % ( | 92.4% ( | |
aTibioperoneal trunk thrombolysis for embolization.
Figure 2.Kaplan–Meier survival curve for overall survival during follow-up.
Figure 3.Kaplan–Meier freedom-from-reintervention curve during follow-up.
Outcomes in claudicants undergoing endovascular procedures for femoropopliteal disease.
| Mortality rate. % ( | 30 days | 0% |
| 1 year | 0% | |
| 2 years | 0% | |
| Overall | 8.1% ( | |
| Cause of death. % ( | Cardiovascular | 16.7% ( |
| Non-cardiovascular | 66.7% ( | |
| Unknown | 16.7% ( | |
| Reintervention rates, % ( | 30 days | 1.2% ( |
| 1 year | 16.5% ( | |
| 2 years | 21.2% ( | |
| More than 2 years | 29.4% ( | |
| Median ABI, Mean ± SD (range) | Preintervention | 0.64 ± 0.16 (0.27–1.00) |
| At 1 month | 0.95 ± 0.18 (0.48–1.35) | |
| At 2 months | 0.96 ± 0.16 (0.48–1.14) | |
| At 6 months | 0.84 ± 0.17 (0.51–1.00) | |
| At 12 months | 0.75 ± 0.18 (0.42–1.00) | |
| At 18 months | 0.80 ± 0.20 (0.40–1.02) | |
| At 24 months | 0.93 ± 0.16 (0.50–0.99) | |
| At 60 months | 0.85 ± 0.21 (0.68–1.21) | |
| Major adverse limb events (MALE), % ( | 30 days | 0% |
| 1 year | 1.2% ( | |
| 2 years | 2.4% ( | |
| Overall | 3.5% ( | |
| Progression to CLTI, % ( | 30 days | 0% |
| 1 year | 1.2% ( | |
| 2 years | 1.2% ( | |
| Overall | 3.5% ( | |
| Minor amputations, % ( | 30 days | 0% |
| 1 year | 0% | |
| 2 years | 0% | |
| Overall | 1.2% ( | |
| Median follow up in months, mean ± SD (range) | 49.0 ± 25.5 (0–92.0) | |
| Reported symptoms at last vascular follow-up % ( | Improved or resolved symptoms | 55.6% ( |
| Stable | 38.9% ( | |
| Worse | 5.6% ( | |
Comparison of patients with improved symptoms versus stable or worse symptoms.
| Improved symptoms ( | Stable or worse symptoms ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean age in years, mean (SD) | 70.0 (10.5) | 66.7 (8.4) | 0.243 |
| Male sex, % | 69% | 75% | 0.667 |
| Mean preintervention ABI, mean (SD) | 0.58 (0.14) | 0.69 (0.15) | 0.014 |
| HTN, % | 73% | 80% | 0.585 |
| DM, % | 42% | 40% | 0.875 |
| Smoking, % | 62% | 65% | 0.809 |
| Dyslipidemia, % | 65% | 85% | 0.133 |
| CAD, % | 27% | 50% | 0.108 |
| Stroke, % | 19% | 10% | 0.388 |
| CKD, % | 4% | 0% | 0.375 |
| Active or previous cancer, % | 8% | 10% | 0.783 |
| Severe comorbidities, %
| 54% | 80% | 0.065 |
| Medications, % | |||
| Antiplatelet agent | 85% | 75% | 0.415 |
| Statin | 73% | 70% | 0.818 |
| Previous intervention | 0% | 4% | 0.259 |
| TASC II classification, % | A 40% | A 13% | 0.065 |
| B 40% | B 67% | ||
| C 20% | C 21% | ||
| Presence of three vessel runoff, % | 69% | 38% | 0.022 |
| Reintervention within 1 year, % | 13% | 25% | 0.273 |
| Reintervention within 2 years, % | 17% | 38% | 0.083 |
| Mean ABI at 12 months, mean (SD) | 0.74 (0.09) | 0.84 (0.14) | 0.343 |
aDefined as presence of three of the following: hypertension (HTN), diabetes mellitus (DM), dyslipidemia, coronary artery disease (CAD) and stroke SD: standard deviation; CKD: chronic kidney disease; TASC: Trans Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus.
Unadjusted odds ratio for factors associated with improved symptoms in patients undergoing endovascular treatment.
| Factor | Unadjusted OR (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|
| Age ≥ 70 | 4.09 (1.14–14.66) | 0.027 |
| Male sex | 0.75 (0.20–2.78) | 0.667 |
| Severe comorbidities
| 0.29 (0.08–1.11) | 0.065 |
| OMT
| 1.80 (0.49–6.55) | 0.373 |
| TASCII A lesion | 4.67 (1.14–19.17) | 0.025 |
| Subintimal recanalization | 0.63 (0.20–1.95) | 0.422 |
| Residual stenosis | 1.13 (0.38–3.38) | 0.829 |
| Vessel dissection | 0.89 (0.30–2.66) | 0.829 |
| Use of stent in index ET | 1.10 (0.38–3.26) | 0.854 |
| 3-Vessel runoff | 3.70 (1.18–11.59) | 0.022 |
| Reintervention | 1.27 (752–2.15) | 0.349 |
| Time to intervention > 12 weeks | 1.68 (1.08–2.62) | 0.065 |
ET: endovascular treatment; CI: confidence intervals
aDefined as presence of three of the following: hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, coronary artery disease, and stroke.
bOMT: optimal medical therapy defined as use of antiplatelets, statin, and non-smoking.
Unadjusted odds ratio for factors associated with reintervention in patients undergoing endovascular treatment.
| Factor | Unadjusted OR (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|
| Age ≥ 70 | 0.93 (0.33–2.59) | 0.887 |
| Male sex | 0.74 (0.24–2.32) | 0.604 |
| Severe comorbidities
| 2.59 (0.82–8.13) | 0.098 |
| OMT
| 1.27 (0.36–4.48) | 0.711 |
| TASCII A lesion | 0.23 (0.06–0.86) | 0.020 |
| 3-Vessel runoff | 0.62 (0.24–1.61) | 0.327 |
| Use of stent in index ET | 1.11 (0.38–3.26) | 0.854 |
ET: endovascular treatment; CI: confidence intervals
aDefined as presence of three of the following: hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, coronary artery disease, and stroke.
bOMT: optimal medical therapy defined as use of antiplatelets, statin, and non-smoking.
Unadjusted odds ratio for factors associated with major adverse limb events in patients undergoing endovascular treatment.
| Factor | Unadjusted OR (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|
| TASCII A or B | 7.00 (0.60–81.68) | 0.076 |
| No 3-vessel runoff | 1.90 (0.17–21.83) | 0.600 |
| Vessel dissection | 1.60 (0.10–26.55) | 0.741 |
| Adjunct intervention in index OR | 1.00 (0.09–11.53) | 1.000 |
| Use of stent in index ET | 1.95 (0.17–22.38) | 0.585 |
| Reintervention within 1 year | 11.67 (0.98–138.94) | 0.017 |
| Reintervention with stent | 14.40 (1.19–173.67) | 0.008 |
| Multiple reinterventions | 39.00 (2.89–526.28) | < 0.001 |
ET: endovascular treatment; CI: confidence intervals.