OBJECTIVES: The effectiveness of supervised exercise programs (SEPs) for the management of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) can be hampered by low accessibility and poor compliance. The current international availability and use of SEPs was evaluated and the evidence on alternative approaches such as structured, home-based exercise programs (HEPs) was reviewed. METHODS-MATERIALS: International survey on SEP availability among vascular surgeons using an online questionnaire. A systematic review on structured-HEPs effectiveness was also performed. RESULTS: A total of 378 responses were collected from 43 countries, with the majority (95%) from Europe. Only 30.4% of the participants had access to SEPs and within this group there was significant heterogeneity on the way SEPs were implemented. This systematic review identified 12 studies on the effectiveness of HEPs. In 3 studies SEPs were superior to HEPs in improving functional capacity or equivalent in improving quality of life (QoL). HEPs significantly improved most of the functional capacity and QoL markers when compared to the "go home and walk" advice and baseline measurements. CONCLUSIONS: SEPs remain an underutilized tool despite recommendations. Structured HEPs may be effective and can be useful alternatives when SEPs are not available. Further research is warranted to establish cost-effectiveness.
OBJECTIVES: The effectiveness of supervised exercise programs (SEPs) for the management of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) can be hampered by low accessibility and poor compliance. The current international availability and use of SEPs was evaluated and the evidence on alternative approaches such as structured, home-based exercise programs (HEPs) was reviewed. METHODS-MATERIALS: International survey on SEP availability among vascular surgeons using an online questionnaire. A systematic review on structured-HEPs effectiveness was also performed. RESULTS: A total of 378 responses were collected from 43 countries, with the majority (95%) from Europe. Only 30.4% of the participants had access to SEPs and within this group there was significant heterogeneity on the way SEPs were implemented. This systematic review identified 12 studies on the effectiveness of HEPs. In 3 studies SEPs were superior to HEPs in improving functional capacity or equivalent in improving quality of life (QoL). HEPs significantly improved most of the functional capacity and QoL markers when compared to the "go home and walk" advice and baseline measurements. CONCLUSIONS:SEPs remain an underutilized tool despite recommendations. Structured HEPs may be effective and can be useful alternatives when SEPs are not available. Further research is warranted to establish cost-effectiveness.
Authors: David G Embrey; Gad Alon; Brenna A Brandsma; Felix Vladimir; Angela Silva; Bethann M Pflugeisen; Paul J Amoroso Journal: Int J Cardiol Date: 2017-06-02 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: Farzin Fakhry; Hugo Jp Fokkenrood; Sandra Spronk; Joep Aw Teijink; Ellen V Rouwet; M G Myriam Hunink Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2018-03-08
Authors: David Hageman; Hugo Jp Fokkenrood; Lindy Nm Gommans; Marijn Ml van den Houten; Joep Aw Teijink Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2018-04-06
Authors: Nicola W Burton; Zanfina Ademi; Stuart Best; Maria A Fiatarone Singh; Jason S Jenkins; Kenny D Lawson; Anthony S Leicht; Yorgi Mavros; Yian Noble; Paul Norman; Richard Norman; Belinda J Parmenter; Jenna Pinchbeck; Christopher M Reid; Sophie E Rowbotham; Lisan Yip; Jonathan Golledge Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2016-11-09 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: S Dörenkamp; E P E Mesters; M W G Nijhuis-van der Sanden; J A W Teijink; R A de Bie; T J Hoogeboom Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-06-23 Impact factor: 3.240