| Literature DB >> 34396306 |
Jan M Leerink1, Helena J H van der Pal2, Leontien C M Kremer2, Elizabeth A M Feijen2, Paola G Meregalli1, Milanthy S Pourier3, Remy Merkx4, Louise Bellersen5, Elvira C van Dalen2, Jacqueline Loonen6, Yigal M Pinto1, Livia Kapusta7,8, Annelies M C Mavinkurve-Groothuis2, Wouter E M Kok1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In childhood cancer survivors (CCS) at risk for heart failure, echocardiographic surveillance recommendations are currently based on anthracyclines and chest-directed radiotherapy dose. Whether the ejection fraction (EF) measured at an initial surveillance echocardiogram can refine these recommendations is unknown.Entities:
Keywords: CCS, childhood cancer survivors; CI, confidence interval; EF, ejection fraction; LVD40, left ventricular dysfunction with an ejection fraction <40%; cardio-oncology; childhood cancer survivors; echocardiography; risk prediction model; surveillance
Year: 2021 PMID: 34396306 PMCID: PMC8352242 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccao.2020.11.013
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JACC CardioOncol ISSN: 2666-0873
Figure 1Flowchart of Patient Inclusion
Flowchart describing the inclusion of childhood cancer survivors (CCS) in the derivation and validation cohort. Adult survivors who were previously treated with cardiotoxic cancer treatments with at least 2 surveillance echocardiograms performed at more than 5 years from cancer diagnosis and with <5 years between each echocardiogram were selected. Survivors with heart failure or an ejection fraction <40% before or at the first surveillance echocardiogram were excluded. echo = echocardiogram; EKZ = Emma Children’s Hospital; Radboud = Radboud University Medical Center.
Characteristics of the CCS in the Derivation and Validation Cohort
| Derivation Cohort: Amsterdam (n = 299) | Validation Cohort: Nijmegen (n = 218) | p Value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 168 (56.2) | 109 (50.0) | 0.192 |
| Age at cancer diagnosis, yrs | 7.22 (4.01–11.71) | 7.02 (4.00–12.46) | 0.625 |
| Time since cancer diagnosis at first follow-up echo, yrs | 16.74 (11.83–23.15) | 16.95 (12.99–21.70) | 0.512 |
| Age at first follow-up echo, yrs | 24.06 (19.60–30.71) | 22.63 (20.05–28.06) | 0.399 |
| Tumor | <0.001 | ||
| ALL | 55 (18.4) | 71 (32.6) | |
| AML | 14 (4.7) | 15 (6.9) | |
| Hodgkin lymphoma | 23 (7.7) | 30 (13.8) | |
| Non-Hodgkin lymphoma | 61 (20.4) | 37 (17.0) | |
| Nephroblastoma | 46 (15.4) | 14 (6.4) | |
| Soft-tissue sarcoma | 28 (9.4) | 7 (3.2) | |
| Ewing sarcoma | 18 (6.0) | 14 (6.4) | |
| Osteosarcoma | 24 (8.0) | 13 (6.0) | |
| CNS tumor | 17 (5.7) | 4 (1.8) | |
| Germ cell tumor | 4 (1.3) | 1 (0.5) | |
| Neuroblastoma | 2 (0.7) | 9 (4.1) | |
| Other | 7 (2.3) | 2 (0.9) | |
| Anthracyclines | 239 (79.9) | 214 (98.2) | <0.001 |
| Cumulative anthracycline dose, mg/m2 | 280.0 (180.0–400.0) | 180.0 (150.0–301.4) | <0.001 |
| Chest RT | 105 (35.1) | 59 (27.1) | 0.065 |
| Chest RT dose, Gy | 25.0 (18.0–33.3) | 20.0 (18.0–30.0) | 0.406 |
| Anthracyclines and chest RT | 45 (15.1) | 56 (25.7) | 0.004 |
| Mitoxantrone | 12 (4.0) | 7 (4.2) | 1.000 |
| Cumulative mitoxantrone dose, mg/m2 | 12.0 (12.0–16.0) | 40.0 (20.0–40.0) | 0.003 |
| EF at first follow-up echo | 57.1 ± 6.9 | 61.6 ± 7.1 | <0.001 |
| EF 40%–49% at first follow-up echo | 41 (13.7) | 12 (5.5) | 0.004 |
| Hypertension | 15 (5.0) | — | |
| Dyslipidemia | 4 (1.34) | — | |
| Diabetes mellitus | 2 (0.7) | — | |
| Heart failure medication(s) use at first echo | 4 (1.3) | 3 (1.4) | 1.000 |
| Follow-up after the first follow-up echo, yrs | 10.90 (8.19–13.05) | 8.86 (5.22–10.86) | <0.001 |
| Number of follow-up echoes per patient | 5 (3–6) | 3 (2–4) | <0.001 |
| Echocardiographic surveillance rate, per 5 yrs | 2.26 (1.96–2.67) | 1.93 (1.57–2.52) | <0.001 |
| Left ventricular dysfunction with EF <40% during follow-up | 11 (3.7) | 7 (3.2) | 0.965 |
Values are n (%), median (25th to 75th percentile), or mean ± SD.
ALL = acute lymphocytic leukemia; AML = acute myeloid leukemia; chest RT = chest-directed radiotherapy; CNS = central nervous system; Gy = gray.
Multivariable Cox Regression of Potential Risk Factors for LVD40 During Follow-Up
| HR (95% CI) | p Value | |
|---|---|---|
| Model without first EF | ||
| Anthracycline dose (per 100-mg/m2 increment) | 1.71 (1.21–2.40) | 0.002 |
| Chest-directed radiotherapy dose (per 10-Gy increment) | 1.65 (1.20–2.26) | 0.002 |
| Model with continuous first EF | ||
| EF at first echocardiogram (per 10-point decrease) | 9.62 (2.84–32.57) | <0.001 |
| Anthracycline dose (per 100-mg/m2 increment) | 1.43 (1.04–1.98) | 0.026 |
| Chest-directed radiotherapy dose (per 10-Gy increment) | 1.67 (1.21–2.30) | 0.002 |
| Model with categorized first EF | ||
| Midrange versus preserved EF at first echocardiogram | 7.81 (2.07–29.50) | 0.002 |
| Anthracycline dose (per 100-mg/m2 increment) | 1.70 (1.22–2.36) | 0.002 |
| Chest-directed radiotherapy dose (per 10-Gy increment) | 1.91 (1.34–2.72) | <0.001 |
CI = confidence interval; EF = ejection fraction; HR = hazard ratio; LVD40 = left ventricular dysfunction with ejection fraction <40%.
Figure 2Calibration Plots
Agreement between the predicted 10-year probabilities of a left ventricular ejection fraction <40% (LVD40) obtained from the Cox regression model compared with the observed 10-year LVD40 probabilities in the derivation and the validation cohorts. Predictions from the final multivariable Cox regression model including ejection fraction are shown.
Time-Dependent Accuracy Measures of the Multivariable Model Including Continuous EF at Different Predicted Risks Cut-Offs for LVD40 at 10-Year Follow-Up After the First Echocardiogram
| Predicted Risk Cut-Off | Actual Risk | % of Cohort With Risk Above Cut-Off | Sensitivity (95% CI) | Specificity (95% CI) | PPV (95% CI) | NPV (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Derivation cohort: Amsterdam | ||||||
| 1.0 | 1.1 | 47.8 | 89.8 (70.6–100.0) | 47.5 (40.2–54.8) | 5.8 (1.9–9.8) | 99.2 (97.7–100.0) |
| 2.0 | 2.1 | 34.1 | 89.8 (70.6–100.0) | 63.0 (55.9–70.0) | 8.0 (2.6–13.5) | 99.4 (98.3–100.0) |
| 3.0 | 3.1 | 23.7 | 89.8 (70.6–100.0) | 76.2 (70.0–82.5) | 12.0 (4.0–20.0) | 99.5 (98.6–100.0) |
| 4.0 | 4.0 | 18.7 | 89.8 (70.6–100.0) | 81.8 (76.1–87.4) | 15.1 (5.2–25.0) | 99.6 (98.7–100.0) |
| 5.0 | 4.9 | 15.4 | 56.0 (23.4–88.6) | 85.1 (79.9–90.3) | 11.9 (1.9–22.0) | 98.2 (96.4–100.0) |
| Validation cohort: Nijmegen | ||||||
| 1.0 | 0.7 | 47.2 | 100.0 (100.0–100.0) | 59.0 (48.4–69.6) | 8.3 (1.7–15.0) | 100.0 (100.0–100.0) |
| 2.0 | 1.9 | 31.7 | 100.0 (100.0–100.0) | 71.1 (61.3–80.9) | 11.4 (2.3–20.5) | 100.0 (100.0–100.0) |
| 3.0 | 3.3 | 25.2 | 85.1 (57.8–100.0) | 77.1 (68.0–86.2) | 12.2 (1.6–22.8) | 99.3 (97.9–100.0) |
| 4.0 | 4.9 | 20.2 | 85.1 (57.8–100.0) | 81.9 (73.6–90.2) | 14.9 (2.0–27.9) | 99.3 (98.0–100.0) |
| 5.0 | 6.6 | 17.0 | 85.1 (57.8–100.0) | 88.0 (80.9–95.0) | 20.8 (3.0–38.7) | 99.4 (98.1–100.0) |
NPV = negative predictive value; PPV = positive predictive value; other abbreviations as in Table 2.
Predicted and actual cumulative incidences of LVD40 at 10 years from the first echocardiogram.
Central IllustrationRefinement of the IGHG Surveillance Guideline Risk Groups Using the EF Measured With a Surveillance Echocardiogram
Predicted probabilities for developing left ventricular dysfunction with ejection fraction (EF) <40% within 10 years in individual fictional survivors. In colors the risk categories (low, moderate, or high) are presented according to the International Late Effects of Childhood Cancer Guideline Harmonization Group (IGHG). In each IGHG risk category, the 10-year probability of left ventricular dysfunction with EF <40% is compared between a survivor with an initial surveillance EF of 48% and a survivor with an initial EF of 55%. Bars represent the risk estimate; error bars represent the 95% confidence interval.