Elizabeth A M Feijen1,2, Wendy M Leisenring3,4, Kayla L Stratton3,4, Kirsten K Ness5, Helena J H van der Pal2, Elvira C van Dalen1,2, Gregory T Armstrong5, Gregory J Aune6, Daniel M Green5, Melissa M Hudson7, Jacqueline Loonen8, Kevin C Oeffinger9, Leslie L Robison5, Yutaka Yasui5, Leontien C M Kremer1,2, Eric J Chow3,4,10. 1. Department of Pediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. 2. Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands. 3. Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington. 4. Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington. 5. Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee. 6. Department of Pediatrics, Greehey Children's Cancer Research Institute, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio. 7. Department of Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee. 8. Department of Hematology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. 9. Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina. 10. Department of Pediatrics, Seattle Children's Hospital, University of Washington, Seattle.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Anthracyclines are part of many effective pediatric cancer treatment protocols. Most pediatric oncology treatment groups assume that the hematologic toxicity of anthracycline agents is equivalent to their cardiotoxicity; for example, Children's Oncology Group substitution rules consider daunorubicin and epirubicin isoequivalent to doxorubicin, whereas mitoxantrone and idarubicin are considered 4 to 5 times as toxic as doxorubicin. OBJECTIVE: To determine optimal dose equivalence ratios for late-onset cardiomyopathy between doxorubicin and other anthracyclines or the anthraquinone mitoxantrone. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This multicenter cohort study of childhood cancer survivors who survived 5 or more years analyzed data pooled from 20 367 participants in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study treated from 1970 to 1999, 5741 participants in the Dutch Childhood Oncology Group LATER study diagnosed between 1963 and 2001, and 2315 participants in the St Jude Lifetime study treated from 1962 to 2005. EXPOSURES: Cumulative doses of each agent (the anthracyclines doxorubicin, daunorubicin, epirubicin, and idarubicin; and the anthraquinone mitoxantrone) along with chest radiotherapy exposure were abstracted from medical records. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Cardiomyopathy (severe, life-threatening, or fatal) by 40 years of age. Agent-specific Cox proportional hazards models evaluated cardiomyopathy risk, adjusting for chest radiotherapy, age at cancer diagnosis, sex, and exposure to anthracyclines or to an anthraquinone. An agent-specific cardiomyopathy equivalence ratio (relative to doxorubicin) was estimated for each dose category as a ratio of the hazard ratios, and then a weighted mean determined the overall agent-specific equivalence ratio across all dose categories. RESULTS: Of 28 423 survivors (46.4% female; median age at cancer diagnosis 6.1 years [range, 0.0-22.7 years]), 9330 patients received doxorubicin, 4433 received daunorubicin, 342 received epirubicin, 241 received idarubicin, and 265 received mitoxantrone. After a median follow-up of 20.0 years (range, 5.0-40.0 years) following receipt of a cancer diagnosis, 399 cardiomyopathy cases were observed. Relative to doxorubicin, the equivalence ratios were 0.6 (95% CI, 0.4-1.0) for daunorubicin, 0.8 (95% CI, 0.5-2.8) for epirubicin, and 10.5 (95% CI, 6.2-19.1) for mitoxantrone. Outcomes were too rare to generate idarubicin-specific estimates. Ratios based on a continuous linear dose-response relationship were similar for daunorubicin (0.5 [95% CI, 0.4-0.7]) and epirubicin (0.8 [95% CI, 0.3-1.4]). The relationship between mitoxantrone and doxorubicin appeared better characterized by a linear exponential model. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In a large data set assembled to examine long-term cardiomyopathy risk in childhood cancer survivors, daunorubicin was associated with decreased cardiomyopathy risk vs doxorubicin, whereas epirubicin was approximately isoequivalent. By contrast, the current hematologic-based doxorubicin dose equivalency of mitoxantrone (4:1) appeared to significantly underestimate the association of mitoxantrone with long-term cardiomyopathy risk.
IMPORTANCE: Anthracyclines are part of many effective pediatric cancer treatment protocols. Most pediatric oncology treatment groups assume that the hematologic toxicity of anthracycline agents is equivalent to their cardiotoxicity; for example, Children's Oncology Group substitution rules consider daunorubicin and epirubicin isoequivalent to doxorubicin, whereas mitoxantrone and idarubicin are considered 4 to 5 times as toxic as doxorubicin. OBJECTIVE: To determine optimal dose equivalence ratios for late-onset cardiomyopathy between doxorubicin and other anthracyclines or the anthraquinone mitoxantrone. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This multicenter cohort study of childhood cancer survivors who survived 5 or more years analyzed data pooled from 20 367 participants in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study treated from 1970 to 1999, 5741 participants in the Dutch Childhood Oncology Group LATER study diagnosed between 1963 and 2001, and 2315 participants in the St Jude Lifetime study treated from 1962 to 2005. EXPOSURES: Cumulative doses of each agent (the anthracyclines doxorubicin, daunorubicin, epirubicin, and idarubicin; and the anthraquinone mitoxantrone) along with chest radiotherapy exposure were abstracted from medical records. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Cardiomyopathy (severe, life-threatening, or fatal) by 40 years of age. Agent-specific Cox proportional hazards models evaluated cardiomyopathy risk, adjusting for chest radiotherapy, age at cancer diagnosis, sex, and exposure to anthracyclines or to an anthraquinone. An agent-specific cardiomyopathy equivalence ratio (relative to doxorubicin) was estimated for each dose category as a ratio of the hazard ratios, and then a weighted mean determined the overall agent-specific equivalence ratio across all dose categories. RESULTS: Of 28 423 survivors (46.4% female; median age at cancer diagnosis 6.1 years [range, 0.0-22.7 years]), 9330 patients received doxorubicin, 4433 received daunorubicin, 342 received epirubicin, 241 received idarubicin, and 265 received mitoxantrone. After a median follow-up of 20.0 years (range, 5.0-40.0 years) following receipt of a cancer diagnosis, 399 cardiomyopathy cases were observed. Relative to doxorubicin, the equivalence ratios were 0.6 (95% CI, 0.4-1.0) for daunorubicin, 0.8 (95% CI, 0.5-2.8) for epirubicin, and 10.5 (95% CI, 6.2-19.1) for mitoxantrone. Outcomes were too rare to generate idarubicin-specific estimates. Ratios based on a continuous linear dose-response relationship were similar for daunorubicin (0.5 [95% CI, 0.4-0.7]) and epirubicin (0.8 [95% CI, 0.3-1.4]). The relationship between mitoxantrone and doxorubicin appeared better characterized by a linear exponential model. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In a large data set assembled to examine long-term cardiomyopathy risk in childhood cancer survivors, daunorubicin was associated with decreased cardiomyopathy risk vs doxorubicin, whereas epirubicin was approximately isoequivalent. By contrast, the current hematologic-based doxorubicin dose equivalency of mitoxantrone (4:1) appeared to significantly underestimate the association of mitoxantrone with long-term cardiomyopathy risk.
Authors: Saro H Armenian; Melissa M Hudson; Renee L Mulder; Ming Hui Chen; Louis S Constine; Mary Dwyer; Paul C Nathan; Wim J E Tissing; Sadhna Shankar; Elske Sieswerda; Rod Skinner; Julia Steinberger; Elvira C van Dalen; Helena van der Pal; W Hamish Wallace; Gill Levitt; Leontien C M Kremer Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Saro H Armenian; Gregory T Armstrong; Gregory Aune; Eric J Chow; Matthew J Ehrhardt; Bonnie Ky; Javid Moslehi; Daniel A Mulrooney; Paul C Nathan; Thomas D Ryan; Helena J van der Pal; Elvira C van Dalen; Leontien C M Kremer Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2018-06-06 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Maureen M O'Brien; Jeffrey W Taub; Myron N Chang; Gita V Massey; Kimo C Stine; Susana C Raimondi; David Becton; Yaddanapudi Ravindranath; Gary V Dahl Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-01-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Elizabeth A M Feijen; Wendy M Leisenring; Kayla L Stratton; Kirsten K Ness; Helena J H van der Pal; Huib N Caron; Gregory T Armstrong; Daniel M Green; Melissa M Hudson; Kevin C Oeffinger; Leslie L Robison; Marilyn Stovall; Leontien C M Kremer; Eric J Chow Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-08-24 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Leslie L Robison; Gregory T Armstrong; John D Boice; Eric J Chow; Stella M Davies; Sarah S Donaldson; Daniel M Green; Sue Hammond; Anna T Meadows; Ann C Mertens; John J Mulvihill; Paul C Nathan; Joseph P Neglia; Roger J Packer; Preetha Rajaraman; Charles A Sklar; Marilyn Stovall; Louise C Strong; Yutaka Yasui; Lonnie K Zeltzer Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-04-13 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Anupama Rao; Robert K Hills; Charles Stiller; Brenda E Gibson; Siebold S N de Graaf; Ian M Hann; Aengus O'Marcaigh; Keith Wheatley; David K H Webb Journal: Br J Haematol Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 6.998
Authors: Stephanie B Dixon; Yan Chen; Yutaka Yasui; Ching-Hon Pui; Stephen P Hunger; Lewis B Silverman; Kirsten K Ness; Daniel M Green; Rebecca M Howell; Wendy M Leisenring; Nina S Kadan-Lottick; Kevin R Krull; Kevin C Oeffinger; Joseph P Neglia; Ann C Mertens; Melissa M Hudson; Leslie L Robison; Gregory T Armstrong; Paul C Nathan Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2020-07-24 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Yan Chen; Eric J Chow; Kevin C Oeffinger; William L Border; Wendy M Leisenring; Lillian R Meacham; Daniel A Mulrooney; Charles A Sklar; Marilyn Stovall; Leslie L Robison; Gregory T Armstrong; Yutaka Yasui Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2020-03-01 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Stephanie B Dixon; Eric J Chow; Lars Hjorth; Melissa M Hudson; Leontien C M Kremer; Lindsay M Morton; Paul C Nathan; Kirsten K Ness; Kevin C Oeffinger; Gregory T Armstrong Journal: Pediatr Clin North Am Date: 2020-12 Impact factor: 3.278
Authors: José Luis Zamorano; Christer Gottfridsson; Riccardo Asteggiano; Dan Atar; Lina Badimon; Jeroen J Bax; Daniela Cardinale; Antonella Cardone; Elizabeth A M Feijen; Péter Ferdinandy; Teresa López-Fernández; Chris P Gale; John H Maduro; Javid Moslehi; Torbjørn Omland; Juan Carlos Plana Gomez; Jessica Scott; Thomas M Suter; Giorgio Minotti Journal: Eur J Heart Fail Date: 2020-10-02 Impact factor: 15.534
Authors: Purnima Singh; Xuexia Wang; Lindsey Hageman; Yanjun Chen; Tarek Magdy; Wendy Landier; Jill P Ginsberg; Joseph P Neglia; Charles A Sklar; Sharon M Castellino; Zoann E Dreyer; Melissa M Hudson; Leslie L Robison; Javier G Blanco; Mary V Relling; Paul Burridge; Smita Bhatia Journal: Cancer Date: 2020-05-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Fatma Güntürkün; Oguz Akbilgic; Robert L Davis; Gregory T Armstrong; Rebecca M Howell; John L Jefferies; Kirsten K Ness; Ibrahim Karabayir; John T Lucas; Deo Kumar Srivastava; Melissa M Hudson; Leslie L Robison; Elsayed Z Soliman; Daniel A Mulrooney Journal: JCO Clin Cancer Inform Date: 2021-04
Authors: Nina Rosa Neuendorff; Kah Poh Loh; Alice S Mims; Konstantinos Christofyllakis; Wee-Kheng Soo; Bediha Bölükbasi; Carlos Oñoro-Algar; William G Hundley; Heidi D Klepin Journal: Blood Adv Date: 2020-02-25