| Literature DB >> 34395606 |
Mohammad Almohammad Alsalh1,2, Anatoly Bakai1, Feyzullah Ramazanovich Feyzullaev1, Ferdaus Rafailovna Bakai1, Tatyana Viktorovna Lepekhina1, Gayane Mkrtchyan1, Anna Krovikova1, Karina Mekhtieva1, Ousama Alhammoud Alyaseen2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to perform a comparative analysis of allelic diversity to reveal population-genetic characteristics of animal breeds, namely Shami (SH), Holstein (HLS), and Aberdeen-Angus (A-A).Entities:
Keywords: Cattle breed; Shami; Syria; alleles; genetics; microsatellites; polymorphism
Year: 2021 PMID: 34395606 PMCID: PMC8280980 DOI: 10.5455/javar.2021.h520
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Adv Vet Anim Res ISSN: 2311-7710
Average number of alleles and the Ne per MS locus in studied cattle breeds.
| Breed | Qty | Average quantity of MS alleles (11 locus) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Na | Ne | ||
| (SH) | 39 | 9.23 ± 1.14 | 5.45 ± 0.83 |
| (HLS) | 55 | 6.18 ± 0.40 | 3.81 ± 0.45 |
| (A-A) | 30 | 5.00 ± 0.36 | 3.18 ± 0.27 |
| Average | 144 | 6.97 ± 0.54 | 4.15 ± 0.36 |
Studied cattle breeds: (SH)—Shami, (HLS)—Holstein, (A-A)—Aberdeen-Angus.
Analysis of the preservation of the Hardy–Weinberg genetic equilibrium in studied cattle breeds.
| Locus | Breed | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| (SH) | (HLS) | (A–A) | |
| TGLA227 | 133,279 | 21,018 | 13,241 |
| BM2113 | 26,212 | 11,094 | 14,459 |
| TGLA53 | 154,174 | 36,420 | 11,000 |
| ETH10 | 18,061 | 6,081 | 3,458 |
| SPS115 | 37,343 | 26,442 | 4,159 |
| TGLA122 | 109,306 | 20,052 | 18,319 |
| INRA23 | 22,538 | 6,847 | 6,650 |
| TGLA126 | 13,266 | 2,663 | 10,524 |
| BM1818 | 24,139 | 6,775 | 13,919 |
| ETH225 | 128,252 | 9,461 | 62,087 |
| BM1824 | 8,685 | 9,632 | 7,992 |
Studied cattle breeds: (SH)—Shami, (HLS)—Holstein, (A-A)—Aberdeen-Angus.
p < 0.05,
p < 0.01,
p < 0.001.
Actual and expected degree of heterozygosity in studied cattle breeds.
| Breed | TR locus | Degree of heterozygosity | Excess (+)/deficiency (-) of heterozygotes, % | UHe | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual | Estimated | |||||
| (SH) | TGLA227 | 0.872 | 0.904 | –0.032 | 0.916 | 0.036 |
| BM2113 | 0.769 | 0.756 | 0.013 | 0.766 | –0.018 | |
| TGLA53 | 0.800 | 0.902 | –0.102 | 0.915 | 0.113 | |
| ETH10 | 0.769 | 0.716 | 0.053 | 0.725 | –0.074 | |
| SPS115 | 0.538 | 0.674 | –0.136 | 0.683 | 0.201 | |
| TGLA122 | 0.744 | 0.866 | –0.122 | 0.877 | 0.141 | |
| INRA23 | 0.769 | 0.803 | –0.034 | 0.813 | 0.042 | |
| TGLA126 | 0.590 | 0.664 | –0.074 | 0.672 | 0.111 | |
| BM1818 | 0.718 | 0.699 | 0.019 | 0.708 | –0.027 | |
| ETH225 | 0.769 | 0.837 | –0.067 | 0.847 | 0.081 | |
| BM1824 | 0.692 | 0.736 | –0.032 | 0.746 | 0.059 | |
| Breed average | 0.730 | 0.778 | –0.048 | 0.788 | 0.060 | |
| (HLS) | TGLA227 | 0.818 | 0.781 | 0.038 | 0.788 | –0.048 |
| BM2113 | 0.764 | 0.726 | 0.037 | 0.733 | –0.051 | |
| TGLA53 | 0.855 | 0.854 | 0.001 | 0.862 | –0.001 | |
| ETH10 | 0.709 | 0.788 | –0.079 | 0.795 | 0.100 | |
| SPS115 | 0.400 | 0.480 | –0.080 | 0.484 | 0.166 | |
| TGLA122 | 0.818 | 0.819 | –0.001 | 0.827 | 0.001 | |
| INRA23 | 0.836 | 0.741 | 0.095 | 0.748 | –0.128 | |
| TGLA126 | 0.636 | 0.583 | 0.053 | 0.589 | –0.091 | |
| BM1818 | 0.582 | 0.599 | –0.017 | 0.604 | 0.028 | |
| ETH225 | 0.655 | 0.681 | –0.026 | 0.687 | 0.038 | |
| BM1824 | 0.636 | 0.638 | –0.001 | 0.643 | 0.002 | |
| Breed average | 0.701 | 0.699 | 0.002 | 0.705 | 0.001 | |
| (A–A) | TGLA227 | 0.867 | 0.803 | 0.063 | 0.817 | –0.079 |
| BM2113 | 0.700 | 0.774 | –0.074 | 0.787 | 0.095 | |
| TGLA53 | 0.273 | 0.607 | –0.335 | 0.636 | 0.551 | |
| ETH10 | 0.667 | 0.669 | –0.003 | 0.681 | 0.004 | |
| SPS115 | 0.633 | 0.688 | –0.055 | 0.700 | 0.080 | |
| TGLA122 | 0.500 | 0.604 | –0.104 | 0.615 | 0.173 | |
| INRA23 | 0.621 | 0.569 | 0.052 | 0.579 | –0.091 | |
| TGLA126 | 0.875 | 0.658 | 0.217 | 0.679 | –0.329 | |
| BM1818 | 0.467 | 0.641 | –0.174 | 0.651 | 0.271 | |
| ETH225 | 0.367 | 0.738 | –0.371 | 0.750 | 0.503 | |
| BM1824 | 0.467 | 0.563 | –0.096 | 0.572 | 0.171 | |
| Breed average | 0.585 | 0.665 | –0.080 | 0.679 | 0.123 | |
Studied cattle breeds: (SH)—Shami, (HLS)—Holstein, (A-A)—Aberdeen-Angus.
F-statistic indicators for studied cattle breeds.
| Locus | Indicators | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| TGLA227 | –0.028 | 0.006 | 0.033 |
| BM2113 | 0.010 | 0.063 | 0.053 |
| TGLA53 | 0.184 | 0.271 | 0.107 |
| ETH10 | 0.013 | 0.090 | 0.079 |
| SPS115 | 0.147 | 0.195 | 0.057 |
| TGLA122 | 0.099 | 0.176 | 0.085 |
| INRA23 | –0.054 | 0.048 | 0.097 |
| TGLA126 | –0.103 | –0.058 | 0.041 |
| BM1818 | 0.089 | 0.129 | 0.044 |
| ETH225 | 0.206 | 0.268 | 0.079 |
| BM1824 | 0.073 | 0.154 | 0.088 |
| Averaged | 0.058 ± 0.030 | 0.122 ± 0.031 | 0.069 ± 0.007 |
Figure 1.Distribution of studied breeds by reference to their own population. Note: studied cattle breeds: (SH)—Shami, (HLS)—Holstein, (A-A)—Aberdeen-Angus.
Genetic distances between studied cattle breeds.
| Breed | Genetic distances as per Nei | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| (HLS) | (SH) | (A–A) | |
| (HLS) | * | ||
| (SH) | 0.107 | * | |
| (A–A) | 0.405 | 0.336 | * |
Studied cattle breeds: (SH)—Shami, (HLS)—Holstein, (A-A)—Aberdeen-Angus. * indicating the mating point between the same breed.