Literature DB >> 34388239

Sustained Use of the Impella 5.0 Heart Pump Enables Bridge to Clinical Decisions in 34 Patients.

Daniel W Nelson1, Sakthi Sundararajan1, Evan Klein2, Lyle D Joyce3, Lucian A Durham3, David L Joyce3, Asim A Mohammed2.   

Abstract

We studied whether sustained hemodynamic support (>7 d) with the Impella 5.0 heart pump can be used as a bridge to clinical decisions in patients who present with cardiogenic shock, and whether such support can improve their outcomes. We retrospectively reviewed cases of patients who had Impella 5.0 support at our hospital from August 2017 through May 2019. Thirty-four patients (23 with cardiogenic shock and 11 with severely decompensated heart failure) underwent sustained support for a mean duration of 11.7 ± 9.3 days (range, ≤48 d). Of 29 patients (85.3%) who survived to next therapy, 15 were weaned from the Impella, 8 underwent durable left ventricular assist device placement, 4 were escalated to venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support, and 2 underwent heart transplantation. The 30-day survival rate was 76.5% (26 of 34 patients). Only 2 patients had a major adverse event: one each had an ischemic stroke and flail mitral leaflet. None of the devices malfunctioned. Sustained hemodynamic support with the Impella 5.0 not only improved outcomes in patients who presented with cardiogenic shock, but also provided time for multidisciplinary evaluation of potential cardiac recovery, or the need for durable left ventricular assist device implantation or heart transplantation. Our study shows the value of using the Impella 5.0 as a bridge to clinical decisions.
© 2021 by the Texas Heart® Institute, Houston.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Equipment safety; heart failure/physiopathology/therapy; heart-assist devices; hemodynamics/physiology; recovery of function; retrospective studies; shock, cardiogenic/complications/mortality/therapy; survival analysis; time factors; treatment outcome

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34388239      PMCID: PMC8367285          DOI: 10.14503/THIJ-20-7260

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J        ISSN: 0730-2347


  24 in total

1.  PCI Strategies in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Holger Thiele; Ibrahim Akin; Marcus Sandri; Georg Fuernau; Suzanne de Waha; Roza Meyer-Saraei; Peter Nordbeck; Tobias Geisler; Ulf Landmesser; Carsten Skurk; Andreas Fach; Harald Lapp; Jan J Piek; Marko Noc; Tomaž Goslar; Stephan B Felix; Lars S Maier; Janina Stepinska; Keith Oldroyd; Pranas Serpytis; Gilles Montalescot; Olivier Barthelemy; Kurt Huber; Stephan Windecker; Stefano Savonitto; Patrizia Torremante; Christiaan Vrints; Steffen Schneider; Steffen Desch; Uwe Zeymer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Randomized comparison of intra-aortic balloon support with a percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients with revascularized acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Holger Thiele; Peter Sick; Enno Boudriot; Klaus-Werner Diederich; Rainer Hambrecht; Josef Niebauer; Gerhard Schuler
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2005-02-25       Impact factor: 29.983

3.  A randomized multicenter clinical study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the TandemHeart percutaneous ventricular assist device versus conventional therapy with intraaortic balloon pumping for treatment of cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Daniel Burkhoff; Howard Cohen; Corinna Brunckhorst; William W O'Neill
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.749

4.  The Impella device for acute mechanical circulatory support in patients in cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Anthony Lemaire; Mark B Anderson; Leonard Y Lee; Peter Scholz; Thomas Prendergast; Andrew Goodman; Ann Marie Lozano; Alan Spotnitz; George Batsides
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  One-Year Outcomes after PCI Strategies in Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Holger Thiele; Ibrahim Akin; Marcus Sandri; Suzanne de Waha-Thiele; Roza Meyer-Saraei; Georg Fuernau; Ingo Eitel; Peter Nordbeck; Tobias Geisler; Ulf Landmesser; Carsten Skurk; Andreas Fach; Alexander Jobs; Harald Lapp; Jan J Piek; Marko Noc; Tomaž Goslar; Stephan B Felix; Lars S Maier; Janina Stepinska; Keith Oldroyd; Pranas Serpytis; Gilles Montalescot; Olivier Barthelemy; Kurt Huber; Stephan Windecker; Lukas Hunziker; Stefano Savonitto; Patrizia Torremante; Christiaan Vrints; Steffen Schneider; Uwe Zeymer; Steffen Desch
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-08-25       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Improved outcome of cardiogenic shock at the acute stage of myocardial infarction: a report from the USIK 1995, USIC 2000, and FAST-MI French nationwide registries.

Authors:  Nadia Aissaoui; Etienne Puymirat; Xavier Tabone; Bernard Charbonnier; Francois Schiele; Thierry Lefèvre; Eric Durand; Didier Blanchard; Tabassome Simon; Jean-Pierre Cambou; Nicolas Danchin
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2012-08-26       Impact factor: 29.983

7.  Outcomes and long-term quality-of-life of patients supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Alain Combes; Pascal Leprince; Charles-Edouard Luyt; Nicolas Bonnet; Jean-Louis Trouillet; Philippe Léger; Alain Pavie; Jean Chastre
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  Clinical Features and outcomes in adults with cardiogenic shock supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Authors:  Brett J Carroll; Ravi V Shah; Venkatesh Murthy; Stephen A McCullough; Nosheen Reza; Sunu S Thomas; Tae H Song; Christopher H Newton-Cheh; Janice M Camuso; Thomas MacGillivray; Thoralf M Sundt; Marc J Semigran; Gregory D Lewis; Joshua N Baker; José P Garcia
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  The ENCOURAGE mortality risk score and analysis of long-term outcomes after VA-ECMO for acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Grégoire Muller; Erwan Flecher; Guillaume Lebreton; Charles-Edouard Luyt; Jean-Louis Trouillet; Nicolas Bréchot; Matthieu Schmidt; Ciro Mastroianni; Jean Chastre; Pascal Leprince; Amedeo Anselmi; Alain Combes
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 10.  Percutaneous short-term active mechanical support devices in cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and collaborative meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Authors:  Holger Thiele; Alexander Jobs; Dagmar M Ouweneel; Jose P S Henriques; Melchior Seyfarth; Steffen Desch; Ingo Eitel; Janine Pöss; Georg Fuernau; Suzanne de Waha
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 29.983

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.