Literature DB >> 34386994

Clinicopathological insights from early structural valve deterioration of a surgical and transcatheter valve-in-valve mitral bioprotheses.

Chiara Tessari1, Mila Della Barbera2, Augusto D'Onofrio1, Maurizio Rubino1, Gino Gerosa1, Cristina Basso2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) is indicated in case of degenerated bioprosthesis in high-risk patients. However, durability of these valves still represents an important issue.
METHODS: Early severe structural valve deterioration of a mitral porcine surgical bioprosthesis and of a subsequent bovine TMVR, both at 4 years follow-up, is here presented.
RESULTS: Gross, histopathologic, and X-ray examination revealed massive calcification of both devices and fibrous tissue overgrowth involving the TMVR stent.
CONCLUSIONS: Careful clinical evaluation and strict follow-up are mandatory to identify early signs of dysfunction and to intervene in a timely manner.
© 2021 The Authors. Journal of Cardiac Surgery published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiovascular pathology; valve repair/replacement

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34386994      PMCID: PMC9291126          DOI: 10.1111/jocs.15912

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Card Surg        ISSN: 0886-0440            Impact factor:   1.778


INTRODUCTION

Structural valve deterioration (SVD) is a well‐known complication that involves bioprostheses within 10–15 years after implantation, with a prevalence of 35% for bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement (MVR). The gold‐standard therapy for this condition is still represented by surgical reoperation, but in case of inoperable or high‐risk patients valve‐in‐valve transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) has been introduced as the alternative therapy. , Nevertheless, it has been recently demonstrated that percutaneous heart valves may undergo SVD similarly to surgical bioprostheses. Herein, we report the results of pathologic analysis of both surgical bioprosthesis and subsequent valve‐in‐valve TMVR affected by early SVD.

CASE REPORT

Clinical data

In 2009, a 55‐year‐old woman with diabetes, thalassemia, and hyperuricemia underwent surgical MVR with a 29 mm porcine Epic Mitral Valve (St. Jude Medical) for rheumatic mitral valve disease causing severe stenosis and moderate–severe regurgitation at our institution. The decision to implant a xenograft was based on serious concerns over patient compliance to the anti‐coagulation regimen and was also influenced by patient choice. The postoperative period was uneventful, and the patient was discharged with oral anticoagulant therapy for the first 3 months, and then with antiplatelet therapy, as recommended. Four years later, she came back with signs of heart failure and evidence of increased mitral gradients (50/27 mmHg, effective orifice area: 0.7 cm2) and severe calcification of the prosthetic cusps at the computed tomography (CT), without signs of thrombosis. After Heart‐Team discussion, the patient was scheduled for trans‐apical valve‐in‐valve (ViV) TMVR due to severe comorbidities (high surgical risk: STS score 14.2%, especially due to severe pulmonary arterial hypertension, previous cardiac surgery, and urgent indication) and also for patient's choice. A 29 mm Edwards Sapien XT valve (Edwards Lifescience) was implanted. The postoperative period was uneventful, and the patient was discharged with acetylsalicylic acid associated with warfarin as antithrombotic strategy. Echocardiography at discharge demonstrated slightly increased trans‐prosthetic gradients (23/11 mmHg), without paravalvular leak. Clinical and echocardiographic 1‐year follow‐up confirmed good prosthesis function. Four years later, the patient was admitted again for acute heart failure. A trans‐thoracic and trans‐esophageal echocardiography showed severe mitral ViV prosthesis SVD. In particular, Sapien XT cusps appeared thickened, hyper‐echogenic and unpliable leading to severe mitral stenosis (medium gradient: 19 mmHg; planimetry area at 3D imaging: 0.5 cm2) and moderate regurgitation. Angio‐CT revealed extensive conal‐shaped calcifications involving both the mitral prostheses and the subvalvular apparatus (Figure 1). Surgical reoperation with removal of the two prostheses and the implantation of a 31 mm Epic valve was considered the only therapeutic chance despite the society of thoracic surgeons predictive risk of mortality 30.5%. Visual inspection revealed: dystrophic calcification of the transcatheter valve, in particular of its posterior cusp; fusion of papillary muscles’ apex with calcific degeneration of the posterior one and fusion of the Sapien XT stent with both papillary muscles. At 2‐year follow‐up she is still in good clinical conditions, without signs of functional impairment.
Figure 1

Angio‐CT scan showing the “conal‐shaped” calcium distribution involving the degenerated mitral ViV device and the subvalvular apparatus. CT, computed tomography; ViV, valve‐in‐valve

Angio‐CT scan showing the “conal‐shaped” calcium distribution involving the degenerated mitral ViV device and the subvalvular apparatus. CT, computed tomography; ViV, valve‐in‐valve

Pathological examination

Explanted valves were fixed in 10% neutral buffer formalin and examined by two experienced cardiovascular pathologists/biologists (C. B., M. D. B.). Before processing, the two valves were photographed and radiographed, to identify any frame fractures and calcification of the cusps. The cusps of the Epic bioprosthesis were mashed in open position and characterized by massive dystrophic calcification and tears in the commissures and in the belly, due to both the iatrogenic effects of the ViV prosthesis implantation and the calcium‐related valve degeneration (Figure 2). The X‐ray calcium score was 4/4. The Sapien XT ViV bioprosthesis showed nodular calcifications of the cusps’ surface, especially in the posterior one, whereas the commissures were free from calcific deposits. Moreover, fibrous tissue overgrowth involved the metallic stent and the ventricular surface of the posterior commissure. The X‐ray calcium score was 3/4.
Figure 2

(A) Atrial view of porcine Epic bioprosthesis with cusps in open position. (B) High‐resolution X‐ray: heavy calcifications demonstrated by the bright signal. (C) Histological section of the sampling of A. Cusp thickening due to intrinsic calcium deposits (black) is evident; collagen fibers disruption and disorientation is present in the tissue cusp close to calcific deposition. (D) Atrial view of Sapien XT bioprosthesis with heavy nodular calcifications of the cusps, but not of the commissures. Fibrous tissue overgrowth involves the metallic stent and one of the commissures. (E) High‐resolution X‐ray: heavy calcifications demonstrated by the bright signal. (F) Histological section of the sampling of D. Intrinsic nodular calcium deposits (black) are detected together with collagen fibers disruption and disorientation in the tissue cusp close to calcific deposition. (C,F) Von Kossa, staining, ×25 original magnification.

(A) Atrial view of porcine Epic bioprosthesis with cusps in open position. (B) High‐resolution X‐ray: heavy calcifications demonstrated by the bright signal. (C) Histological section of the sampling of A. Cusp thickening due to intrinsic calcium deposits (black) is evident; collagen fibers disruption and disorientation is present in the tissue cusp close to calcific deposition. (D) Atrial view of Sapien XT bioprosthesis with heavy nodular calcifications of the cusps, but not of the commissures. Fibrous tissue overgrowth involves the metallic stent and one of the commissures. (E) High‐resolution X‐ray: heavy calcifications demonstrated by the bright signal. (F) Histological section of the sampling of D. Intrinsic nodular calcium deposits (black) are detected together with collagen fibers disruption and disorientation in the tissue cusp close to calcific deposition. (C,F) Von Kossa, staining, ×25 original magnification. Samples of the Epic surgical mitral valve and of the Sapien XT bioprosthesis cusps, in correspondence of nodular calcific deposits underwent histological investigation with Haematoxylin–eosin, Azan Mallory Heidenhein modified, Elastic Weigert‐van Gieson, Alcian blue‐PAS, and von Kossa stains. In the cusps of both the Epic and Sapien XT bioprostheses conspicuous, intrinsic nodular calcific deposits were found; collagen fibers, close to mineralization deposits, were disrupted and not oriented.

DISCUSSION

Early occurrence of severe SVD both in a porcine‐stented surgical bioprosthesis and then in a bovine TMVR device is herein reported. Patient's age is recognized to represent a strong risk factor for a limited valve longevity, despite advances in fixation and anti‐mineralization processes. In addition, it is well‐known from data of surgical MVR that prostheses in mitral position have a higher rate of degeneration than those in aortic position, because of their exposition to a systolic pressure gradient that increases hemodynamic stress. , In contrast of the previous St. Jude mitral valve, the Biocor valve, the Epic bioprosthesis is treated with Linx AC technology to improve long‐term performance and valve durability. Analyses of the Linx AC treatment have demonstrated resistance to calcification by extracting lipids, reducing free aldehydes, minimizing cholesterol uptake, and stabilizing leaflet collagen. , , Lehmann et al. reported freedom from SVD of 95.8 ± 1.5% after 5 years and of 93.8 ± 2.4% after 10 years in Epic valves. However, this was in a cohort of patients with a mean age of 73 years. Our report confirms that implantation of biological valves in patients <65 years is associated with early valve degeneration, despite advanced anticalcification treatments. As far as transcatheter bioprostheses are concerned, limited data exist regarding their application for patients with failed MVR. Some of the larger series of TMVR does not report any structural valve degeneration, but their results are limited to 1‐year follow‐up. , In this case we have reported degeneration of TMVR after 4 years. Thus, a longer term follow‐up of TMVR procedures may bright to light more cases of valve failure. Besides classical issues of anticalcification treatment and patient‐related risk factors, additional device‐related factors need to be discussed to explain TMVR SVD. Microscopic lesions as collagen fiber fragmentation and disruption, despite normal macroscopic cusps appearance, immediately after valve deployment, probably due to crimping/deployment procedures, have been already reported in the literature. It is difficult to say at the present time whether these lesions will have an impact on prosthesis durability, but long‐term data of TVMR will be helpful. Another possible explanation for the Sapien XT early SVD can be its suboptimal hemodynamic condition due to the “tube graft” shape created by the ViV procedure in the left ventricle: in fact, the second valve continuously holds open the first one, creating a “tube graft” into the subvalvular apparatus and in some cases interfering with the left ventricular outflow tract. Possible consequences can be represented by suboptimal (as in our case) or high residual gradients, which may have a significant impact for valve durability. Furthermore, the transcatheter valve showed fibrous tissue overgrowth (or “pannus”), especially on the ventricular surface of the posterior commissure. Pannus can form as part of a host's reaction to procedural trauma, a foreign body, or as the end product of organized thrombus formation. In our case, pannus involved the posterior commissure, while anterior cusps and commissures were unaffected. The anterior part of the valve faces the left ventricle outflow tract where the blood flow runs at a higher velocity, probably preventing thrombus deposition and consequent pannus formation. In contrast, in the posterior part blood flow is likely to be of lower velocity and without clear run‐off, favoring thrombus deposition. Despite no signs of thrombus formation, it might organize as fibrous pannus, as to reduce cusps mobility. We can suggest that in our case the combo antithrombotic therapy was not enough to prevent its formation.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, early SVD after mitral ViV is a potential occurrence, especially in young patients. Therefore, a strict clinical and echocardiographic follow‐up is mandatory to identify this complication and to intervene in a timely manner.

CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

The authors declare that there are no conflict of interests.

ETHICS STATEMENT

This manuscript and all its content meet the ethical guidelines, including adherence to the legal requirements of the study country. Patient's informed consent for the procedures and for data collection for scientific purposes was always collected.
  15 in total

Review 1.  Calcification of tissue heart valve substitutes: progress toward understanding and prevention.

Authors:  Frederick J Schoen; Robert J Levy
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Comparison of Clinical and Echocardiographic Outcomes After Surgical Redo Mitral Valve Replacement and Transcatheter Mitral Valve-in-Valve Therapy.

Authors:  Norihiko Kamioka; Vasilis Babaliaros; Michael Andrew Morse; Tiberio Frisoli; Stamatios Lerakis; Jose Miguel Iturbe; Jose Binongo; Frank Corrigan; Altayyeb Yousef; Patrick Gleason; John A Wells; Hope Caughron; Andy Dong; Evelio Rodriguez; Bradley Leshnower; William O'Neill; Gaetano Paone; Marvin Eng; Robert Guyton; Peter C Block; Adam Greenbaum
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 11.195

3.  Porcine xenograft for aortic, mitral and double valve replacement: long-term results of 2544 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Sven Lehmann; Denis R Merk; Christian D Etz; Andreas Oberbach; Madlen Uhlemann; Fabian Emrich; Anne-Kathrin Funkat; Anna Meyer; Jens Garbade; Fahrad Bakhtiary; Martin Misfeld; Friedrich Wilhelm Mohr
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 4.191

4.  Prevention of calcification of glutaraldehyde-crosslinked porcine aortic cusps by ethanol preincubation: mechanistic studies of protein structure and water-biomaterial relationships.

Authors:  N R Vyavahare; D Hirsch; E Lerner; J Z Baskin; R Zand; F J Schoen; R J Levy
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1998-06-15

5.  Predicting LVOT Obstruction in Transcatheter Mitral Valve Implantation: Concept of the Neo-LVOT.

Authors:  Philipp Blanke; Christopher Naoum; Danny Dvir; Vinayak Bapat; Kevin Ong; David Muller; Anson Cheung; Jian Ye; James K Min; Nicolo Piazza; Pascal Theriault-Lauzier; John Webb; Jonathon Leipsic
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-03-09

6.  Technique versus technology and the (r)evolution of cardiac surgery: a professional journey from classical surgery to embracing intervention.

Authors:  Augusto D'Onofrio; Gino Gerosa
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 4.191

7.  Standardized definitions of structural deterioration and valve failure in assessing long-term durability of transcatheter and surgical aortic bioprosthetic valves: a consensus statement from the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) endorsed by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS).

Authors:  Davide Capodanno; Anna S Petronio; Bernard Prendergast; Helene Eltchaninoff; Alec Vahanian; Thomas Modine; Patrizio Lancellotti; Lars Sondergaard; Peter F Ludman; Corrado Tamburino; Nicolò Piazza; Jane Hancock; Julinda Mehilli; Robert A Byrne; Andreas Baumbach; Arie Pieter Kappetein; Stephan Windecker; Jeroen Bax; Michael Haude
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 4.191

8.  Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement for Degenerated Bioprosthetic Valves and Failed Annuloplasty Rings.

Authors:  Sung-Han Yoon; Brian K Whisenant; Sabine Bleiziffer; Victoria Delgado; Niklas Schofer; Lena Eschenbach; Buntaro Fujita; Rahul Sharma; Marco Ancona; Ermela Yzeiraj; Stefano Cannata; Colin Barker; James E Davies; Antonio H Frangieh; Florian Deuschl; Tomaz Podlesnikar; Masahiko Asami; Abhijeet Dhoble; Anthony Chyou; Jean-Bernard Masson; Harindra C Wijeysundera; Daniel J Blackman; Rajiv Rampat; Maurizio Taramasso; Enrique Gutierrez-Ibanes; Tarun Chakravarty; Guiherme F Attizzani; Tsuyoshi Kaneko; S Chiu Wong; Horst Sievert; Fabian Nietlispach; David Hildick-Smith; Luis Nombela-Franco; Lenard Conradi; Christian Hengstenberg; Michael J Reardon; Albert Markus Kasel; Simon Redwood; Antonio Colombo; Saibal Kar; Francesco Maisano; Stephan Windecker; Thomas Pilgrim; Stephan M Ensminger; Bernard D Prendergast; Joachim Schofer; Ulrich Schaefer; Jeroen J Bax; Azeem Latib; Raj R Makkar
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in failed bioprosthetic surgical valves.

Authors:  Danny Dvir; John G Webb; Sabine Bleiziffer; Miralem Pasic; Ron Waksman; Susheel Kodali; Marco Barbanti; Azeem Latib; Ulrich Schaefer; Josep Rodés-Cabau; Hendrik Treede; Nicolo Piazza; David Hildick-Smith; Dominique Himbert; Thomas Walther; Christian Hengstenberg; Henrik Nissen; Raffi Bekeredjian; Patrizia Presbitero; Enrico Ferrari; Amit Segev; Arend de Weger; Stephan Windecker; Neil E Moat; Massimo Napodano; Manuel Wilbring; Alfredo G Cerillo; Stephen Brecker; Didier Tchetche; Thierry Lefèvre; Federico De Marco; Claudia Fiorina; Anna Sonia Petronio; Rui C Teles; Luca Testa; Jean-Claude Laborde; Martin B Leon; Ran Kornowski
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Mitral Valve-in-Valve Implantation as an Elective or Rescue Procedure in High-Risk Patients.

Authors:  Adham Elmously; Berhane Worku; Katherine D Gray; Arash Salemi
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 4.330

View more
  1 in total

1.  Clinicopathological insights from early structural valve deterioration of a surgical and transcatheter valve-in-valve mitral bioprotheses.

Authors:  Chiara Tessari; Mila Della Barbera; Augusto D'Onofrio; Maurizio Rubino; Gino Gerosa; Cristina Basso
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 1.778

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.