Literature DB >> 34386934

Hope for male fecundity: clinically insignificant changes in semen parameters over 10 years at a single clinic while assessing an infertility population.

Ido Feferkorn1, Guy Shrem2,3, Liat Azani4, Weon-Young Son2, Tamar Nehushtan4, Mali Salmon-Divon4,5, Michael Haim Dahan2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: What is the trend in sperm parameters in a group of men attending a single reproductive center, over a 10-year period?
METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on 12,188 semen samples obtained from unique individuals who attended a university reproductive clinic from 2009 to 2018, inclusively. Semen analysis was done using computer-assisted sperm analysis and verified by an andrologist. Analysis was done after dividing the dataset into two groups: above WHO 2010 lower reference limits (ARL) (N = 6325) and below the reference limits (BRL) (N = 5521).
RESULTS: Volume increased slightly (ARL, p = 0.049) before returning to baseline or was stable (BRL, p = 0.59). Sperm concentration and total count of the BRL and ARL group declined initially and then recovered slightly (p < 0.0001, in all cases). Although these changes were statistically significant, this was due to the large study population; clinically, these changes were quite mild and would not have been significant for fertility. Sperm total motility and progressive motility of both the BRL group and the ARL group increased slightly from 2009 until 2015 and then decreased back to baseline (p < 0.0001). This change offset the decrease in count seen in those years. A spurious change was observed with sperm morphology that declined after the first 2 years and remained stable thereafter (p < 0.0001, in both groups). However, this change was attributed to a contemporaneous change in the method of analyzing strict morphology which happened when the change occurred.
CONCLUSION: While statistically significant changes were found, clinically, these changes were quite mild and would not have been significant for fertility.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Andrology; Computer sperm analysis; Male infertility; Semen analysis; Sperm quality

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34386934      PMCID: PMC8609088          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-021-02298-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  18 in total

Review 1.  Evidence for decreasing quality of semen during past 50 years.

Authors:  E Carlsen; A Giwercman; N Keiding; N E Skakkebaek
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-09-12

2.  Insights into semen analysis: a Chinese perspective on the fifth edition of the WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen.

Authors:  Wen-Hong Lu; Yi-Qun Gu
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2010-06-14       Impact factor: 3.285

3.  Average sperm count remains unchanged despite reduction in maternal smoking: results from a large cross-sectional study with annual investigations over 21 years.

Authors:  L Priskorn; L Nordkap; A K Bang; M Krause; S A Holmboe; D L Egeberg Palme; S B Winge; N Mørup; E Carlsen; U N Joensen; M Blomberg Jensen; K M Main; A Juul; N E Skakkebaek; T K Jensen; N Jørgensen
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Total motile sperm count: a better indicator for the severity of male factor infertility than the WHO sperm classification system.

Authors:  J A M Hamilton; M Cissen; M Brandes; J M J Smeenk; J P de Bruin; J A M Kremer; W L D M Nelen; C J C M Hamilton
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  Total motile sperm count has a superior predictive value over the WHO 2010 cut-off values for the outcomes of intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles.

Authors:  E Borges; A S Setti; D P A F Braga; R C S Figueira; A Iaconelli
Journal:  Andrology       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 3.842

6.  An age-based sperm nomogram: the McGill reference guide.

Authors:  Mali Salmon-Divon; Guy Shrem; Jacques Balayla; Tamar Nehushtan; Alexander Volodarsky-Perel; Naama Steiner; Weon-Young Son; Michael H Dahan
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 7.  Cigarette Smoking and Semen Quality: A New Meta-analysis Examining the Effect of the 2010 World Health Organization Laboratory Methods for the Examination of Human Semen.

Authors:  Reecha Sharma; Avi Harlev; Ashok Agarwal; Sandro C Esteves
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Seminal profile of 23,504 patients over the years: 7 years of experience.

Authors:  Camila Nogueira; Ivan Henrique Yoshida; Fabia Lima Vilarino; Waldemar Pereira de Carvalho; Emerson Barch Cordts; Caio Parente Barbosa
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2018-11-01

9.  National, regional, and global trends in infertility prevalence since 1990: a systematic analysis of 277 health surveys.

Authors:  Maya N Mascarenhas; Seth R Flaxman; Ties Boerma; Sheryl Vanderpoel; Gretchen A Stevens
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 11.069

Review 10.  Declining Sperm Counts… or Rather Not? A Mini Review.

Authors:  Konstantinos Ravanos; Stamatios Petousis; Chrysoula Margioula-Siarkou; Achilleas Papatheodorou; Yannis Panagiotidis; Nikos Prapas; Yannis Prapas
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Surv       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.347

View more
  1 in total

1.  Is seminal quality worsening? A 20-year experience in Córdoba, Argentina.

Authors:  Nicolás David Ramírez; Andrea Tissera; Rosa Molina; Pablo Gaggino; Arnaldo Mangeaud; Ana Carolina Martini
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 3.357

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.