Literature DB >> 27152971

Total motile sperm count has a superior predictive value over the WHO 2010 cut-off values for the outcomes of intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles.

E Borges1,2, A S Setti1,2, D P A F Braga1,2, R C S Figueira1, A Iaconelli1,2.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare (i) the intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes among groups with different total motile sperm count ranges, (ii) the intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes between groups with normal and abnormal total motile sperm count, and (iii) the predictive values of WHO 2010 cut-off values and pre-wash total motile sperm count for the intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes, in couples with male infertility. This study included data from 518 patients undergoing their first intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycle as a result of male infertility. Couples were divided into five groups according to their total motile sperm count: Group I, total motile sperm count <1 × 10(6) ; group II, total motile sperm count 1-5 × 10(6) ; group III, total motile sperm count 5-10 × 10(6) ; group IV, total motile sperm count 10-20 × 10(6) ; and group V, total motile sperm count >20 × 10(6) (which was considered a normal total motile sperm count value). Then, couples were grouped into an abnormal and normal total motile sperm count group. The groups were compared regarding intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes. The predictive values of WHO 2010 cut-off values and total motile sperm count for the intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes were also investigated. The fertilization rate was lower in total motile sperm count group I compared to total motile sperm count group V (72.5 ± 17.6 vs. 84.9 ± 14.4, p = 0.011). The normal total motile sperm count group had a higher fertilization rate (84.9 ± 14.4 vs. 81.1 ± 15.8, p = 0.016) and lower miscarriage rate (17.9% vs. 29.5%, p = 0.041) compared to the abnormal total motile sperm count group. The total motile sperm count was the only parameter that demonstrated a predictive value for the formation of high-quality embryos on D2 (OR: 1.18, p = 0.013), formation of high-quality embryos on D3 (OR: 1.12, p = 0.037), formation of blastocysts on D5 (OR: 1.16, p = 0.011), blastocyst expansion grade on D5 (OR: 1.27, p = 0.042), and the odds of miscarriage (OR: 0.52, p < 0.045). The total motile sperm count has a greater predictive value than the WHO 2010 cut-off values for laboratory results and pregnancy outcomes in couples undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection as a result of male infertility.
© 2016 American Society of Andrology and European Academy of Andrology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  infertility; intracytoplasmic sperm injection; sperm count; sperm motility; spermatozoa

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27152971     DOI: 10.1111/andr.12199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Andrology        ISSN: 2047-2919            Impact factor:   3.842


  22 in total

1.  Sperm parameters that play a major role in the assessment of semen quality after cryopreservation.

Authors:  A Palomar Rios; I Molina Botella
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-06-17       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Abnormal sperm concentration and motility as well as advanced paternal age compromise early embryonic development but not pregnancy outcomes: a retrospective study of 1266 ICSI cycles.

Authors:  Alessandro Bartolacci; Luca Pagliardini; Sofia Makieva; Andrea Salonia; Enrico Papaleo; Paola Viganò
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  A collective tracking method for preliminary sperm analysis.

Authors:  Sung-Yang Wei; Hsuan-Hao Chao; Han-Ping Huang; Chang Francis Hsu; Sheng-Hsiang Li; Long Hsu
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 2.819

4.  Reproductive outcomes with donor sperm in couples with severe male-factor infertility after intracytoplasmic sperm injection failures.

Authors:  He Cai; Stephan Gordts; Jianhua Sun; Bin Meng; Juanzi Shi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  The effect of paternal age on semen quality and fertilization outcome in men with normal sperm DNA compaction, reactive oxygen species, and total antioxidant capacity levels.

Authors:  Sara Darbandi; Mahsa Darbandi; Hamid Reza Khorram Khorshid; Mohammad Reza Sadeghi; Mahnaz Heidari; Ghazaleh Cheshmi; Mohammad Mehdi Akhondi
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2019-02-05

6.  Male Age and Progressive Sperm Motility Are Critical Factors Affecting Embryological and Clinical Outcomes in Oocyte Donor ICSI Cycles.

Authors:  Paraskevi Vogiatzi; Abraham Pouliakis; Maria Sakellariou; Aikaterini Athanasiou; Adamantios Athanasiou; Alexandros Colaghis; Renata Finelli; Dimitrios Loutradis; Ralf Henkel; Ashok Agarwal
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 3.060

7.  Sperm preparation after freezing improves motile sperm count, motility, and viability in frozen-thawed sperm compared with sperm preparation before freezing-thawing process.

Authors:  A Palomar Rios; A Gascón; J V Martínez; S Balasch; I Molina Botella
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Time to improvement in semen parameters after microsurgical varicocelectomy in men with severe oligospermia.

Authors:  Thomas A Masterson; Aubrey B Greer; Ranjith Ramasamy
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 1.862

9.  Hope for male fecundity: clinically insignificant changes in semen parameters over 10 years at a single clinic while assessing an infertility population.

Authors:  Ido Feferkorn; Guy Shrem; Liat Azani; Weon-Young Son; Tamar Nehushtan; Mali Salmon-Divon; Michael Haim Dahan
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  Abnormal fertilization in ICSI and its association with abnormal semen parameters: a retrospective observational study on 1855 cases.

Authors:  Konstantinos Pantos; Konstantinos Sfakianoudis; Evangelos Maziotis; Anna Rapani; Eleni Karantzali; Artemis Gounari-Papaioannou; Terpsithea Vaxevanoglou; Michael Koutsilieris; Mara Simopoulou
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2021 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.285

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.