| Literature DB >> 34386344 |
Ankur Goyal1, Nagesh Wadgera1, Deep Narayan Srivastava1, Mohammed Tahir Ansari2, Rakesh Dawar3.
Abstract
Nerves are commonly injured in case of blunt or penetrating trauma to the extremities. Patients with nerve injuries have profound consequences and thus a timely decision for operative management is a very important. Conventionally, management decisions have been based on clinical findings, patient course and electrophysiological studies. However, imaging modalities have an enormous role not only in localizing and grading of the nerve injuries but also in the follow-up of the nerve recovery. High-resolution ultrasound (HUS) is the modality of choice for evaluation of peripheral nerves. Magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) plays a complementary role, enabling better assessment of muscle changes and deeper nerves. Corresponding to the injured layer of the cross-section of the nerve, imaging manifestations differ in different grades of injury. Since imaging cannot detect ultrastructural changes at the microscopic level, thus there may be overlap in the imaging findings. Herewith, we discuss the imaging findings in different grades of nerve injury and propose a simple 3-tier grading for imaging (HUS and MRN) assessment of peripheral nerve injuries.Entities:
Keywords: High-resolution ultrasound (HUS); Magnetic resonance; Neurography (MRN); Peripheral nerve injuries
Year: 2021 PMID: 34386344 PMCID: PMC8333344 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2021.101510
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Orthop Trauma ISSN: 0976-5662