Literature DB >> 3438510

[Rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament: a frequently unrecognized cause of failure of unicompartmental knee prostheses. Apropos of a series of 79 Lotus prostheses with a follow-up of more than 5 years].

G Deschamps1, B Lapeyre.   

Abstract

Out of 386 unicompartmental prostheses inserted in the Orthopaedic Centre in Dracy Le Fort between 1977 and 1986, 79 cases in 68 patients with a follow-up equal to or more than five years and a mean of seven years were able to be reviewed. This study showed that 75 per cent of knees had a satisfactory result and 25 per cent were failures. Apart from well-recognised causes of failure such as rheumatoid arthritis, overcorrection or the use of a six millimetre tibial plateau, the authors discovered a frequent cause not clearly recorded in the literature--that is anterior cruciate laxity. This situation was found retrospectively in the pre-operative weight-bearing radiographs. Out of 15 knees showing a pre-operative laxity equal to or greater than 10 mm in the lateral radiograph, 13 were failures and 10 were operated on again after a mean of three-and-a-half years. An investigation of anterior cruciate laxity should be made systematically by weight-bearing lateral radiographs, if necessary with stress views, before recommending a unicompartmental prosthesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3438510

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot        ISSN: 0035-1040


  17 in total

1.  [AMC unicondylar prosthesis].

Authors:  G Saxler; D Temmen; G Bontemps
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  [In vivo biomechanics of unicondylar knee replacement performed using minimally invasive technique].

Authors:  J-N A Argenson; R D Komistek; S Akizuki
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Revision technique for failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  L Barba
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  1995-12

4.  [The causes of failures in unicondylar knee arthroplasties].

Authors:  B Maudhuit
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  1995-12

Review 5.  Satisfactory outcomes following combined unicompartmental knee replacement and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Andrea Volpin; S G Kini; D E Meuffels
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Comparing in vivo kinematics of unicondylar and bi-unicondylar knee replacements.

Authors:  Scott A Banks; Benjamin J Fregly; Filippo Boniforti; Christoph Reinschmidt; Sergio Romagnoli
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2005-01-20       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Experimental loss of menisci, cartilage and subchondral bone gradually increases anteroposterior knee laxity.

Authors:  Karl Wieser; Michael Betz; Mazda Farshad; Magdalena Vich; Sandro F Fucentese; Dominik C Meyer
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Combined unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Marco Tinius; Pierre Hepp; Roland Becker
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  ACL reconstruction with unicondylar replacement in knee with functional instability and osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Srikrishna R S R Krishnan; Ray Randle
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 2.359

10.  [Unicompartmental PCA series].

Authors:  G Gacon
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  1995-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.