| Literature DB >> 34384470 |
Dawei Liang1, Jia Pei2, Leilei Zhang3, Haonan Ling3, Youwen Liu3, Xiantao Chen3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of femoral head and neck fenestration combined with autologous bone mixed with β-tricalcium phosphate porous bioceramic bone (light bulb procedure) through Orthopdische Chirurgie München approach (OCM approach) for pre-collapse non-traumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head(ONFH).Entities:
Keywords: Bone grafting; Non-vascularized; OCM approach; Osteonecrosis of the femoral head; Risk factors; THA
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34384470 PMCID: PMC8359556 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-021-02632-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Orthop Surg Res ISSN: 1749-799X Impact factor: 2.359
Demographic characteristics of patients
| Parameter | Numerical value | Statistics |
|---|---|---|
| Gender | ||
| male | 39 | |
| female | 8 | |
| Age(y) | 38.3 ± 7.5 | |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 25.9 ± 2.9 | |
| 25(OH)D (nmol/L) | 39.6 ± 17.9 | |
| CTX (ng/mL) | 0.828 ± 0.418 | |
| Etiology | ||
| Alcoholic | 21 | |
| Hormonal | 13 | |
| Idiopathic | 13 | |
| ARCO stage | ||
| ARCO IIB | 10 | |
| ARCO IIC | 14 | |
| ARCO IIIA | 23 | |
| Follow up time (month) | 44.6 ± 10.0 | |
| Operative time (min) | 116.70 ± 14.19 | |
| Intraoperative blood loss (ml) | 220.64 ± 75.63 | |
| Harris hip score | ||
| Preoperative | 64.45 ± 2.93 | |
| Postoperative | 76.29 ± 10.38 | |
Fig. 1a, b Anteroposterior and frog-like radiographs of a 38-year-old male patient showing uneven density within the femoral head. c MRI T1WI showed femoral head necrosis. d OCM approach fenestration in the head and neck images of non-vascularized bone graft blocks occluding the bone window (black arrow). e Images of the ilium taken with subcutaneous tissue detached proximally from the same incision (black arrow). f, g Anteroposterior and frog radiographs of the hip at 3 months postoperatively showed increased bone density in the femoral head and good osteogenesis in the bone graft area. h At 6 months post-operation, the frontal radiograph of the hip joint showed good osteogenesis in the femoral head and swelling of the soft tissue around the hip due to high fever and pain in the operation area. i MRI T2WI showed synovial hyperplasia and edema in the joint. Edema of the muscle layer around the hip joint may indicate infection. j Original incision exposed the neck of the femoral head to visible intra-articular purulent secretions (black arrow). k Bone healing at the fenestration in the neck of the original femoral head (black arrow). l, m Anteroposterior and frog radiographs of the hip after debridement. n, o Anteroposterior and frog radiographs of the hip at the last follow-up show good osteogenesis of the bone graft region and stable femoral head
Single factor analysis of risk factors for postoperative failure
| Variable | Clinical success | Clinical failure | Statistic |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | |||
| Male | 25 | 14 | χ |
| Female | 5 | 3 | |
| Age(y) | |||
| < 40 | 19 | 7 | χ |
| ≥ 40 | 11 | 10 | |
| BMI (kg/m2) | |||
| < 24 | 5 | 6 | χ |
| ≥ 24 | 25 | 11 | |
| 25(OH)D (nmol/L) | |||
| < 50 | 17 | 15 | χ |
| ≥ 50 | 13 | 2 | |
| CTX (ng/mL) | |||
| < 0.714 | 12 | 4 | χ |
| ≥ 0.714 | 18 | 13 | |
| Etiology | |||
| Alcoholic | 16 | 5 | χ |
| Hormonal | 7 | 6 | |
| Idiopathic | 7 | 6 | |
| ARCO stage | |||
| ARCO IIB | 9 | 1 | χ |
| ARCO IIC | 12 | 2 | |
| ARCO IIIA | 9 | 14 | |
COX multivariate risk model analysis of risk factors for postoperative clinical failure
| Variable | Wald χ | Relative risk | 95%CI | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| lower | upper | ||||
| ARCO stage | |||||
| ARCO IIB | |||||
| ARCO IIC | 2.598 | 0.175 | 0.021 | 1.458 | 0.107 |
| ARCO IIIA | 4.347 | 0.204 | 0.046 | 0.909 | 0.037 |
| 25(OH)D (nmol/L) | |||||
| < 50 | 1.009 | 2.209 | 0.471 | 10.364 | 0.315 |
| ≥ 50 | |||||
Demographic characteristics of patients with ARCO IIIA
| Gender | Age(y) | Etiology | BMI (kg/m2) | 25(OH)D (nmol/L) | CTX (ng/mL) | Follow up time (month) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clinical failure | Male | 50 | Alcoholic | 23 | 12.19 | 0.958 | 31 |
| Male | 50 | Idiopathic | 26 | 17.85 | 0.147 | 28 | |
| Male | 50 | Alcoholic | 21 | 20.76 | 1.232 | 28 | |
| Male | 41 | Idiopathic | 23 | 21.17 | 0.739 | 48 | |
| Male | 49 | Hormonal | 23 | 23.78 | 1.005 | 30 | |
| Male | 32 | Idiopathic | 29 | 26.77 | 1.319 | 44 | |
| Male | 47 | Alcoholic | 24 | 32.05 | 0.730 | 40 | |
| Male | 43 | Idiopathic | 29 | 32.40 | 0.890 | 37 | |
| Female | 39 | Idiopathic | 22 | 40.14 | 0.922 | 30 | |
| Male | 29 | Hormonal | 32 | 74.01 | 0.144 | 24 | |
| Female | 47 | Hormonal | 28 | 45.40 | 1.203 | 50 | |
| Male | 35 | Hormonal | 25 | 47.71 | 0.942 | 24 | |
| Male | 34 | Hormonal | 25 | 24.37 | 0.890 | 36 | |
| Male | 46 | Idiopathic | 29 | 20.76 | 1.353 | 40 | |
| Clinical success | Male | 40 | Alcoholic | 27 | 15.99 | 0.531 | 56 |
| Male | 40 | Alcoholic | 28 | 18.23 | 1.241 | 58 | |
| Male | 31 | Alcoholic | 28 | 54.23 | 0.145 | 48 | |
| Male | 37 | Idiopathic | 22 | 54.59 | 0.148 | 52 | |
| Male | 32 | Alcoholic | 34 | 34.41 | 1.364 | 52 | |
| Male | 32 | Alcoholic | 29 | 38.43 | 1.430 | 53 | |
| Male | 30 | Idiopathic | 25 | 40.14 | 1.181 | 41 | |
| Female | 24 | Hormonal | 22 | 45.40 | 0.837 | 54 | |
| Female | 49 | Hormonal | 28 | 72.64 | 1.069 | 39 |