| Literature DB >> 34384385 |
Scherwin Mahmoudi1, Simon S Martin1, Jörg Ackermann2, Yauheniya Zhdanovich2, Ina Koch2, Thomas J Vogl1, Moritz H Albrecht1, Lukas Lenga1, Simon Bernatz3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To assess the potential of radiomic features to quantify components of blood in intraaortic vessels to non-invasively predict moderate-to-severe anemia in non-contrast enhanced CT scans.Entities:
Keywords: Anemia; Artificial intelligence; Blood; CT; Radiomics
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34384385 PMCID: PMC8359593 DOI: 10.1186/s12880-021-00654-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Med Imaging ISSN: 1471-2342 Impact factor: 1.930
Fig. 1CLAIM flowchart of patient inclusion into the study. CLAIM, Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging; DECT, dual-energy computed tomography
Patients characteristics and baseline demographics
| Parameters | Value |
|---|---|
| Patients | 100 |
| Female | 54 |
| Male | 46 |
| Median age (y)* | 69 (19–94) |
| Maximum time (h) between blood test / CT scan | ± 24 |
| Mean hemoglobin [mg/dL]** | 11.82 (2.39, 12.29, 11.35) |
| Mean hematocrit [%]** | 34.80 (6.72, 36.14, 33.47) |
If not state otherwise, the numbers depict absolute numbers
CT, computed tomography; h, hours; y, years
*Data in round parenthesis are min/max values (interquartile range)
**Data in round parenthesis are standard deviation and ± 95% confidence interval
Fig. 2Representative images of the measurement technique. Axial (a), sagittal (b) and coronal (c) plane with 3D-volume rendering (d) of a standard volume of interest (VOI) placement is shown in a patient with a hemoglobin and hematocrit level of 7.2 g/dL and 22.4%, respectively. A spherical VOI with 1 cm in diameter was placed within the lumen of the thoracoabdominal aorta as described in detail in the materials and methods section
Top 20 radiomic features with highest variable importance based on measurement of correlations with hemoglobin and hematocrit values
| Features | Hemoglobin | Hematocrit |
|---|---|---|
| firstorder-Median | ||
| firstorder-Mean | ||
| firstorder-RootMeanSquared | ||
| firstorder-TotalEnergy | ||
| firstorder-90Percentile | ||
| firstorder-10Percentile | ||
| firstorder-Maximum | ||
| firstorder-Energy | ||
| firstorder-Minimum | ||
| glszm-GrayLevelNonUniformity | 0.052 | |
| glszm-LowGrayLevelZoneEmphasis | 0.069 | 0.074 |
| glcm-MaximumProbability | 0.083 | 0.108 |
| glrlm-ShortRunLowGrayLevelEmphasis | 0.101 | 0.109 |
| glszm-SmallAreaLowGrayLevelEmphasis | 0.083 | 0.115 |
| glcm-Idmn | 0.118 | 0.128 |
| ngtdm-Contrast | 0.149 | 0.135 |
| glszm-SmallAreaEmphasis | 0.094 | 0.138 |
| glrlm-LowGrayLevelRunEmphasis | 0.124 | 0.141 |
| glszm-SmallAreaHighGrayLevelEmphasis | 0.162 | 0.149 |
| gldm-LowGrayLevelEmphasis | 0.133 | 0.15 |
Measurement of correlation of all radiomic features with hemoglobin and hematocrit levels obtained ± 24 h to the acquisition of the computed tomography images. Measurement of probability used for hypothesis testing is depicted as p-value. Significant values are labeled in bold font. Top 20 features are shown, sorted according to the hematocrit p-value and with the matching hemoglobin p-value
Fig. 3Analysis of radiomic features that are significantly correlated with hemoglobin and hematocrit levels. The matrix of correlations of the selected radiomic features with highest correlation to the hemoglobin [g/dL] and hematocrit [%] levels obtained ± 24 h to computed tomography images are shown (a). Exemplary scatter plots of the correlation of hemoglobin values with the prioritized top 3 radiomic features are shown (b–d). All depicted features belong to the feature class of first-order statistics. 10P = 10 Percentile; 90P = 90 Percentile; Max = Maximum; Min = Minimum; RMS = Root Mean Squared; TE = Total Energy
Matrix of correlations of radiomic features with significant correlation with hemoglobin and hematocrit levels
| Firstorder-Median | firstorder-Energy | firstorder-TotalEnergy | firstorder-Maximum | firstorder-RootMeanSquared | firstorder-90Percentile | firstorder-Minimum | firstorder-10Percentile | firstorder-Mean | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| firstorder-Median | 1.000 | 0.387 | 0.971 | 0.411 | 0.977 | 0.891 | 0.437 | 0.869 | 0.993 |
| firstorder-Energy | 0.387 | 1.000 | 0.422 | 0.568 | 0.427 | 0.431 | − 0.139 | 0.253 | 0.388 |
| firstorder-TotalEnergy | 0.971 | 0.422 | 1.000 | 0.525 | 0.992 | 0.947 | 0.339 | 0.783 | 0.973 |
| firstorder-Maximum | 0.411 | 0.568 | 0.525 | 1.000 | 0.541 | 0.646 | − 0.273 | 0.116 | 0.422 |
| firstorder-RootMeanSquared | 0.977 | 0.427 | 0.992 | 0.541 | 1.000 | 0.961 | 0.334 | 0.781 | 0.980 |
| firstorder-90Percentile | 0.891 | 0.431 | 0.947 | 0.646 | 0.961 | 1.000 | 0.186 | 0.598 | 0.894 |
| firstorder-Minimum | 0.437 | − 0.139 | 0.339 | − 0.273 | − 0.334 | 0.186 | 1.000 | 0.665 | 0.468 |
| firstorder-10Percentile | 0.869 | 0.253 | 0.783 | 0.116 | 0.781 | 0.598 | 0.665 | 1.000 | 0.887 |
| firstorder-Mean | 0.993 | 0.388 | 0.973 | 0.422 | 0.980 | 0.894 | 0.468 | 0.887 | 1.000 |
Multivariate measurements of correlations of radiomic features that are significantly correlated with hemoglobin and hematocrit levels
Fig. 4Radiomic features to decipher moderate-to-severe anemia. Box-Whisker Plots for the radiomic features median (a), minimum (b) and energy (c) versus hemoglobin levels are shown. Hemoglobin values were split according to the threshold of 10 g/dL to differentiate moderate-to-severe anemia [25–28]. Statistical analyses are depicted using two-tailed student’s t-test
Fig. 5Median density measurement of Hounsfield units reveals the best working model to predict moderate-to-severe anemia. Analysis of prediction performance for moderate-to-severe anemia with 2 variant feature subsets applying random forest (RF) machine learning algorithms (a–c). Monte Carlo cross-validation with 100 random splits (colored lines represent each single measurement) receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis of the validation cohort with mean ROC curve (blue) and ± 1 standard deviation (grey area) are shown for Median and Minimum (a) or Median only (b). RF maximum depth was 2 (a) and 1 (b). c The Box-Whisker Plots with 5–95% percentile for both cross-validated prediction models with the respective accuracy, area under the curve (AUC) and precision. Two-tailed, unpaired student’s t-test was applied for model comparison (c, p-values). d A decision tree with a depth of 1 for firstorder-Median. The gini value measures the impurity of the group. The decision tree minimizes the measure of impurity by a bisection of the group of 100 patients into two groups, one with 21 patients and a second with 79. The so-called gini gain, i.e., the sum of gini values of the child nodes weighted by the number of their members, becomes optimal for a selection threshold 36.5 of the firstorder-Median