Literature DB >> 34384042

Comparing Smoking Cessation Interventions among Underserved Patients Referred for Lung Cancer Screening: A Pragmatic Trial Protocol.

Rachel Kohn1,2,3, Anil Vachani2, Dylan Small4, Alisa J Stephens-Shields5, Dorothy Sheu1, Vanessa L Madden1, Brian A Bayes1, Marzana Chowdhury1, Sadie Friday1, Jannie Kim1, Michael K Gould6, Mohamed H Ismail7, Beth Creekmur8, Matthew A Facktor9, Charlotte Collins10, Kristina K Blessing11, Christine M Neslund-Dudas12,13, Michael J Simoff13,14, Elizabeth R Alleman12,13, Leonard H Epstein15, Michael A Horst16, Michael E Scott17, Kevin G Volpp2,3,18,19,20, Scott D Halpern1,2,3,5,18,19, Joanna L Hart1,2,3,18,19,20.   

Abstract

Smoking burdens are greatest among underserved patients. Lung cancer screening (LCS) reduces mortality among individuals at risk for smoking-associated lung cancer. Although LCS programs must offer smoking cessation support, the interventions that best promote cessation among underserved patients in this setting are unknown. This stakeholder-engaged, pragmatic randomized clinical trial will compare the effectiveness of four interventions promoting smoking cessation among underserved patients referred for LCS. By using an additive study design, all four arms provide standard "ask-advise-refer" care. Arm 2 adds free or subsidized pharmacologic cessation aids, arm 3 adds financial incentives up to $600 for cessation, and arm 4 adds a mobile device-delivered episodic future thinking tool to promote attention to long-term health goals. We hypothesize that smoking abstinence rates will be higher with the addition of each intervention when compared with arm 1. We will enroll 3,200 adults with LCS orders at four U.S. health systems. Eligible patients include those who smoke at least one cigarette daily and self-identify as a member of an underserved group (i.e., is Black or Latinx, is a rural resident, completed a high school education or less, and/or has a household income <200% of the federal poverty line). The primary outcome is biochemically confirmed smoking abstinence sustained through 6 months. Secondary outcomes include abstinence sustained through 12 months, other smoking-related clinical outcomes, and patient-reported outcomes. This pragmatic randomized clinical trial will identify the most effective smoking cessation strategies that LCS programs can implement to reduce smoking burdens affecting underserved populations. Clinical trial registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04798664). Date of registration: March 12, 2021. Date of trial launch: May 17, 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  lung cancer screening; pragmatic clinical trial; smoking cessation; tobacco cessation; vulnerable populations

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34384042      PMCID: PMC8867367          DOI: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202104-499SD

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc        ISSN: 2325-6621


  71 in total

1.  An ethics framework for a learning health care system: a departure from traditional research ethics and clinical ethics.

Authors:  Ruth R Faden; Nancy E Kass; Steven N Goodman; Peter Pronovost; Sean Tunis; Tom L Beauchamp
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.683

2.  What to do with a patient who smokes.

Authors:  Steven A Schroeder
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-07-27       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Lung cancer screening as a teachable moment for smoking cessation.

Authors:  Kathryn L Taylor; Lisa Sanderson Cox; Nicole Zincke; Larina Mehta; Colleen McGuire; Edward Gelmann
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2006-12-28       Impact factor: 5.705

4.  Misdirections in Informed Consent - Impediments to Health Care Innovation.

Authors:  David A Asch; Tracy A Ziolek; Shivan J Mehta
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  Differences in Quit Attempts and Cigarette Smoking Abstinence Between Whites and African Americans in the United States: Literature Review and Results From the International Tobacco Control US Survey.

Authors:  Jessica A Kulak; Monica E Cornelius; Geoffrey T Fong; Gary A Giovino
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 4.244

6.  Annual number of lung cancer deaths potentially avertable by screening in the United States.

Authors:  Jiemin Ma; Elizabeth M Ward; Robert Smith; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Attitudes and Perceptions About Smoking Cessation in the Context of Lung Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Steven B Zeliadt; Jaimee L Heffner; George Sayre; Deborah E Klein; Carol Simons; Jennifer Williams; Lynn F Reinke; David H Au
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 21.873

8.  Smoking among U.S. Hispanic/Latino adults: the Hispanic community health study/study of Latinos.

Authors:  Robert C Kaplan; Shrikant I Bangdiwala; Janice M Barnhart; Sheila F Castañeda; Marc D Gellman; David J Lee; Eliseo J Pérez-Stable; Gregory A Talavera; Marston E Youngblood; Aida L Giachello
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 5.043

9.  Trends in lung cancer screening in the United States, 2016-2017.

Authors:  Ikenna C Okereke; Shawn Nishi; Jie Zhou; James S Goodwin
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.895

10.  Stakeholder Research Priorities for Smoking Cessation Interventions within Lung Cancer Screening Programs. An Official American Thoracic Society Research Statement.

Authors:  Hasmeena Kathuria; Frank C Detterbeck; Joelle T Fathi; Kathleen Fennig; Michael K Gould; Denise G Jolicoeur; Stephanie R Land; Greta M Massetti; Peter J Mazzone; Gerard A Silvestri; Christopher G Slatore; Robert A Smith; Anil Vachani; Steven B Zeliadt; Renda Soylemez Wiener
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 30.528

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.