RATIONALE: Smoking cessation counseling in conjunction with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) lung cancer screening is recommended in multiple clinical practice guidelines. The best approach for integrating effective smoking cessation interventions within this setting is unknown. OBJECTIVES: To summarize evidence, identify research gaps, prioritize topics for future research, and propose standardized tools for use in conducting research on smoking cessation interventions within the LDCT lung cancer screening setting. METHODS: The American Thoracic Society convened a multistakeholder committee with expertise in tobacco dependence treatment and/or LDCT screening. During an in-person meeting, evidence was reviewed, research gaps were identified, and key questions were generated for each of three research domains: (1) target population to study; (2) adaptation, development, and testing of interventions; and (3) implementation of interventions with demonstrated efficacy. We also identified standardized measures for use in conducting this research. A larger stakeholder panel then ranked research questions by perceived importance in an online survey. Final prioritization was generated hierarchically on the basis of average rank assigned. RESULTS: There was little consensus on which questions within the population domain were of highest priority. Within the intervention domain, research to evaluate the effectiveness in the lung cancer screening setting of evidence-based smoking cessation interventions shown to be effective in other contexts was ranked highest. In the implementation domain, stakeholders prioritized understanding strategies to identify and overcome barriers to integrating smoking cessation in lung cancer screening settings. CONCLUSIONS: This statement offers an agenda to stimulate research surrounding the integration and implementation of smoking cessation interventions with LDCT lung cancer screening.
RATIONALE: Smoking cessation counseling in conjunction with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) lung cancer screening is recommended in multiple clinical practice guidelines. The best approach for integrating effective smoking cessation interventions within this setting is unknown. OBJECTIVES: To summarize evidence, identify research gaps, prioritize topics for future research, and propose standardized tools for use in conducting research on smoking cessation interventions within the LDCT lung cancer screening setting. METHODS: The American Thoracic Society convened a multistakeholder committee with expertise in tobacco dependence treatment and/or LDCT screening. During an in-person meeting, evidence was reviewed, research gaps were identified, and key questions were generated for each of three research domains: (1) target population to study; (2) adaptation, development, and testing of interventions; and (3) implementation of interventions with demonstrated efficacy. We also identified standardized measures for use in conducting this research. A larger stakeholder panel then ranked research questions by perceived importance in an online survey. Final prioritization was generated hierarchically on the basis of average rank assigned. RESULTS: There was little consensus on which questions within the population domain were of highest priority. Within the intervention domain, research to evaluate the effectiveness in the lung cancer screening setting of evidence-based smoking cessation interventions shown to be effective in other contexts was ranked highest. In the implementation domain, stakeholders prioritized understanding strategies to identify and overcome barriers to integrating smoking cessation in lung cancer screening settings. CONCLUSIONS: This statement offers an agenda to stimulate research surrounding the integration and implementation of smoking cessation interventions with LDCT lung cancer screening.
Entities:
Keywords:
LDCT screening; lung cancer screening; research priorities; smoking cessation; tobacco dependence treatment
Authors: Carlijn M van der Aalst; Harry J de Koning; Karien A M van den Bergh; Marc C Willemsen; Rob J van Klaveren Journal: Lung Cancer Date: 2011-11-04 Impact factor: 5.705
Authors: Nichole T Tanner; Mulugeta Gebregziabher; Chanita Hughes Halbert; Elizabeth Payne; Leonard E Egede; Gerard A Silvestri Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2015-07-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Elyse R Park; Ilana F Gareen; Sandra Japuntich; Inga Lennes; Kelly Hyland; Sarah DeMello; JoRean D Sicks; Nancy A Rigotti Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Amy K Ferketich; Gregory A Otterson; Mark King; Nathan Hall; Kristine K Browning; Mary Ellen Wewers Journal: Lung Cancer Date: 2011-11-15 Impact factor: 5.705
Authors: Brady J McKee; Shawn M Regis; Andrea B McKee; Sebastian Flacke; Christoph Wald Journal: J Am Coll Radiol Date: 2014-08-28 Impact factor: 5.532
Authors: Hasmeena Kathuria; Elisa Koppelman; Belinda Borrelli; Christopher G Slatore; Jack A Clark; Karen E Lasser; Renda Soylemez Wiener Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2020-03-16 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Jihyoun Jeon; Theodore R Holford; David T Levy; Eric J Feuer; Pianpian Cao; Jamie Tam; Lauren Clarke; John Clarke; Chung Yin Kong; Rafael Meza Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2018-10-09 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Rachel Kohn; Anil Vachani; Dylan Small; Alisa J Stephens-Shields; Dorothy Sheu; Vanessa L Madden; Brian A Bayes; Marzana Chowdhury; Sadie Friday; Jannie Kim; Michael K Gould; Mohamed H Ismail; Beth Creekmur; Matthew A Facktor; Charlotte Collins; Kristina K Blessing; Christine M Neslund-Dudas; Michael J Simoff; Elizabeth R Alleman; Leonard H Epstein; Michael A Horst; Michael E Scott; Kevin G Volpp; Scott D Halpern; Joanna L Hart Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2022-02
Authors: Jaimee L Heffner; Scott Coggeshall; Chelle L Wheat; Paul Krebs; Laura C Feemster; Deborah E Klein; Linda Nici; Hannah Johnson; Steven B Zeliadt Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2021-07-19 Impact factor: 6.473
Authors: Rafael Meza; Jihyoun Jeon; Iakovos Toumazis; Kevin Ten Haaf; Pianpian Cao; Mehrad Bastani; Summer S Han; Erik F Blom; Daniel E Jonas; Eric J Feuer; Sylvia K Plevritis; Harry J de Koning; Chung Yin Kong Journal: JAMA Date: 2021-03-09 Impact factor: 157.335
Authors: Frank T Leone; Yuqing Zhang; Sarah Evers-Casey; A Eden Evins; Michelle N Eakin; Joelle Fathi; Kathleen Fennig; Patricia Folan; Panagis Galiatsatos; Hyma Gogineni; Stephen Kantrow; Hasmeena Kathuria; Thomas Lamphere; Enid Neptune; Manuel C Pacheco; Smita Pakhale; David Prezant; David P L Sachs; Benjamin Toll; Dona Upson; Dan Xiao; Luciane Cruz-Lopes; Izabela Fulone; Rachael L Murray; Kelly K O'Brien; Sureka Pavalagantharajah; Stephanie Ross; Yuan Zhang; Meng Zhu; Harold J Farber Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2020-07-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Sara C Buttery; Parris Williams; Rebecca Mweseli; Keir Elmslie James Philip; Ahmed Sadaka; Emily Jade Bartlett; Anand Devaraj; Samual Kemp; Jamie Addis; Jane Derbyshire; Michelle Chen; Katie Morris; Anthony Laverty; Nicholas S Hopkinson Journal: BMJ Open Respir Res Date: 2022-02
Authors: M Patricia Rivera; Hormuzd A Katki; Nichole T Tanner; Matthew Triplette; Lori C Sakoda; Renda Soylemez Wiener; Roberto Cardarelli; Lisa Carter-Harris; Kristina Crothers; Joelle T Fathi; Marvella E Ford; Robert Smith; Robert A Winn; Juan P Wisnivesky; Louise M Henderson; Melinda C Aldrich Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2020-10-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Peter J Mazzone; Gerard A Silvestri; Lesley H Souter; Tanner J Caverly; Jeffrey P Kanne; Hormuzd A Katki; Renda Soylemez Wiener; Frank C Detterbeck Journal: Chest Date: 2021-07-13 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Peter J Mazzone; Gerard A Silvestri; Lesley H Souter; Tanner J Caverly; Jeffrey P Kanne; Hormuzd A Katki; Renda Soylemez Wiener; Frank C Detterbeck Journal: Chest Date: 2021-07-13 Impact factor: 9.410