| Literature DB >> 12923506 |
Kevin O'Brien1, Jean Wright, Frances Conboy, YeWeng Sanjie, Nicky Mandall, Stephen Chadwick, Ivan Connolly, Paul Cook, David Birnie, Mark Hammond, Nigel Harradine, David Lewis, Cathy McDade, Laura Mitchell, Alison Murray, Julian O'Neill, Mike Read, Stephen Robinson, Dai Roberts-Harry, Jonathan Sandler, Ian Shaw.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of Herbst and Twin-block appliances for established Class II Division I malocclusion. The study was a multicenter, randomized clinical trial carried out in orthodontic departments in the United Kingdom. A total of 215 patients (aged 11-14 years) were randomized to receive treatment with either the Herbst or the Twin-block appliance. Treatment with the Herbst appliance resulted in a lower failure-to-complete rate for the functional appliance phase of treatment (12.9%) than did treatment with Twin-block (33.6%). There were no differences in treatment time between appliances, but significantly more appointments (3) were needed for repair of the Herbst appliance than for the Twin-block. There were no differences in skeletal and dental changes between the appliances; however, the final occlusal result and skeletal discrepancy were better for girls than for boys. Because of the high cooperation rates of patients using it, the Herbst appliance could be the appliance of choice for treating adolescents with Class II Division 1 malocclusion. The trade-off for use of the Herbst is more appointments for appliance repair.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2003 PMID: 12923506 DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(03)00345-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop ISSN: 0889-5406 Impact factor: 2.650