Literature DB >> 34380737

COS-derived GPP relationships with temperature and light help explain high-latitude atmospheric CO2 seasonal cycle amplification.

Lei Hu1,2, Stephen A Montzka2, Aleya Kaushik3,2, Arlyn E Andrews2, Colm Sweeney2, John Miller2, Ian T Baker4, Scott Denning4, Elliott Campbell5, Yoichi P Shiga6, Pieter Tans2, M Carolina Siso3,2, Molly Crotwell3,2, Kathryn McKain3,2, Kirk Thoning2, Bradley Hall2, Isaac Vimont3,2, James W Elkins2, Mary E Whelan7, Parvadha Suntharalingam8.   

Abstract

In the Arctic and Boreal region (ABR) where warming is especially pronounced, the increase of gross primary production (GPP) has been suggested as an important driver for the increase of the atmospheric CO2 seasonal cycle amplitude (SCA). However, the role of GPP relative to changes in ecosystem respiration (ER) remains unclear, largely due to our inability to quantify these gross fluxes on regional scales. Here, we use atmospheric carbonyl sulfide (COS) measurements to provide observation-based estimates of GPP over the North American ABR. Our annual GPP estimate is 3.6 (2.4 to 5.5) PgC · y-1 between 2009 and 2013, the uncertainty of which is smaller than the range of GPP estimated from terrestrial ecosystem models (1.5 to 9.8 PgC · y-1). Our COS-derived monthly GPP shows significant correlations in space and time with satellite-based GPP proxies, solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence, and near-infrared reflectance of vegetation. Furthermore, the derived monthly GPP displays two different linear relationships with soil temperature in spring versus autumn, whereas the relationship between monthly ER and soil temperature is best described by a single quadratic relationship throughout the year. In spring to midsummer, when GPP is most strongly correlated with soil temperature, our results suggest the warming-induced increases of GPP likely exceeded the increases of ER over the past four decades. In autumn, however, increases of ER were likely greater than GPP due to light limitations on GPP, thereby enhancing autumn net carbon emissions. Both effects have likely contributed to the atmospheric CO2 SCA amplification observed in the ABR.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arctic and Boreal ecosystems; CO2 seasonal cycle amplitude; carbonyl sulfide; climate change; gross primary production

Year:  2021        PMID: 34380737      PMCID: PMC8379989          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2103423118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   12.779


  24 in total

1.  CO2 enhancement of forest productivity constrained by limited nitrogen availability.

Authors:  Richard J Norby; Jeffrey M Warren; Colleen M Iversen; Belinda E Medlyn; Ross E McMurtrie
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-10-25       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Net carbon dioxide losses of northern ecosystems in response to autumn warming.

Authors:  Shilong Piao; Philippe Ciais; Pierre Friedlingstein; Philippe Peylin; Markus Reichstein; Sebastiaan Luyssaert; Hank Margolis; Jingyun Fang; Alan Barr; Anping Chen; Achim Grelle; David Y Hollinger; Tuomas Laurila; Anders Lindroth; Andrew D Richardson; Timo Vesala
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-01-03       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Anthropogenic emissions of methane in the United States.

Authors:  Scot M Miller; Steven C Wofsy; Anna M Michalak; Eric A Kort; Arlyn E Andrews; Sebastien C Biraud; Edward J Dlugokencky; Janusz Eluszkiewicz; Marc L Fischer; Greet Janssens-Maenhout; Ben R Miller; John B Miller; Stephen A Montzka; Thomas Nehrkorn; Colm Sweeney
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Expansion of high-latitude deciduous forests driven by interactions between climate warming and fire.

Authors:  Zelalem A Mekonnen; William J Riley; James T Randerson; Robert F Grant; Brendan M Rogers
Journal:  Nat Plants       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 15.793

5.  Agricultural Green Revolution as a driver of increasing atmospheric CO2 seasonal amplitude.

Authors:  Ning Zeng; Fang Zhao; George J Collatz; Eugenia Kalnay; Ross J Salawitch; Tristram O West; Luis Guanter
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Direct human influence on atmospheric CO2 seasonality from increased cropland productivity.

Authors:  Josh M Gray; Steve Frolking; Eric A Kort; Deepak K Ray; Christopher J Kucharik; Navin Ramankutty; Mark A Friedl
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Sources and sinks of carbonyl sulfide in an agricultural field in the Southern Great Plains.

Authors:  Kadmiel Maseyk; Joseph A Berry; Dave Billesbach; John Elliott Campbell; Margaret S Torn; Mark Zahniser; Ulli Seibt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Seasonal fluxes of carbonyl sulfide in a midlatitude forest.

Authors:  Róisín Commane; Laura K Meredith; Ian T Baker; Joseph A Berry; J William Munger; Stephen A Montzka; Pamela H Templer; Stephanie M Juice; Mark S Zahniser; Steven C Wofsy
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Enhanced seasonal CO2 exchange caused by amplified plant productivity in northern ecosystems.

Authors:  Matthias Forkel; Nuno Carvalhais; Christian Rödenbeck; Ralph Keeling; Martin Heimann; Kirsten Thonicke; Sönke Zaehle; Markus Reichstein
Journal:  Science       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Enhanced seasonal exchange of CO2 by northern ecosystems since 1960.

Authors:  H D Graven; R F Keeling; S C Piper; P K Patra; B B Stephens; S C Wofsy; L R Welp; C Sweeney; P P Tans; J J Kelley; B C Daube; E A Kort; G W Santoni; J D Bent
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 47.728

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.