| Literature DB >> 34380583 |
C Bommarito1, M Wahl1, D W Thieltges2, C Pansch3, M Zucchetta4, F Pranovi5.
Abstract
Although it is generally known that a combination of abiotic and biotic drivers shapes the distribution and abundance of parasites, our understanding of the interplay of these factors remains to be assessed for most marine host species. The present field survey investigated spatial patterns of richness, prevalence and abundance of parasites in Mytilus galloprovincialis along the coast of the northern Adriatic Sea. Herein, the relationships between biotic (host size, density and local parasite richness of mussel population) and abiotic (eutrophication and salinity) drivers and parasite richness of mussel individuals, prevalence and abundance were analysed. Local parasite richness was the most relevant factor driving parasite species richness in mussel individuals. Prevalence was mainly driven by eutrophication levels in three out of four parasite species analysed. Similarly, abundance was driven mainly by eutrophication in two parasite species. Mussel size, density and salinity had only minor contributions to the best fitting models. This study highlights that the influence of abiotic and biotic drivers on parasite infections in mussels can be differentially conveyed, depending on the infection measure applied, i.e. parasite richness, prevalence or abundance. Furthermore, it stresses the importance of eutrophication as a major factor influencing parasite prevalence and abundance in mussels in the Adriatic Sea.Entities:
Keywords: Abundance; Adriatic; Mytilus galloprovincialis; TRIX; eutrophication; parasite; prevalence; richness
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34380583 PMCID: PMC8862135 DOI: 10.1017/S0031182021001438
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasitology ISSN: 0031-1820 Impact factor: 3.234
Fig. 1.Map of the sampling stations along the North Adriatic Sea. In the western area salinity decreases (surrounding area of the Po Estuary). A wind-driven circulation of water masses together with the Po River discharge results in a west-east gradient of nutrients: The western area of the northern region is characterized by eutrophic waters while the eastern area is characterized by oligotrophic waters.
Station name, average salinity, average temperature, average trophic index TRIX (indicator of trophic status of coastal waters), mussel mean density (±s.d.) and average length (±SE) of mussels collected in each station along the North Adriatic Sea
| Station | Salinity (psu) | Temperature (°C) | TRIX | Mean mussel density (no. per 50 × 50 cm plot) ± | Mean mussel size (mm) ± | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| November/December | June/July/August | |||||
| S1 | 38.4 ± 0.4 | 14.7 ± 2.3 | 25.4 ± 1.6 | 4.4 | 30 ± 0 | 40.8 ± 2.2 |
| S2 | 38.5 ± 0.4 | 14.9 ± 2.2 | 25.4 ± 1.6 | 2.7 | 14.6 ± 10 | 44.5 ± 0.8 |
| S3 | 38.1 ± 0.6 | 14.1 ± 2.5 | 25.7 ± 1.8 | 3.8 | 415 ± 512 | 30.2 ± 0.6 |
| S4 | 38.2 ± 0.5 | 13.5 ± 2.6 | 25.8 ± 1.9 | 3.42 | 156 ± 168 | 42.9 ± 0.9 |
| S5 | 38.1 ± 0.5 | 13.3 ± 2.6 | 26.0 ± 1.9 | 4.47 | 33.3 ± 16 | 36.9 ± 0.8 |
| S6 | 38.0 ± 0.6 | 13.7 ± 2.5 | 26.2 ± 1.8 | 4.07 | 26.6 ± 12 | 36.6 ± 0.9 |
| S7 | 37.8 ± 0.7 | 13.4 ± 2.6 | 26.5 ± 1.9 | 4.35 | 300 ± 50 | 37.8 ± 0.8 |
| S8 | 37.7 ± 0.9 | 13.3 ± 2.7 | 26.4 ± 1.7 | 4.2 | 466.6 ± 57 | 35.4 ± 0.9 |
| S9 | 37.5 ± 1.2 | 13.5 ± 2.5 | 26.3 ± 1.8 | 4.7 | 600 ± 100 | 36.8 ± 0.8 |
| S10 | 37.1 ± 1.3 | 13.5 ± 2.4 | 26.4 ± 1.9 | 4.8 | 1000 ± 0 | 23.4 ± 0.3 |
| S11 | 36.8 ± 1.4 | 13.6 ± 2.4 | 26.4 ± 1.9 | 4.5 | 500 ± 0 | 30.9 ± 0.9 |
| S12 | 36.7 ± 1.3 | 13.4 ± 2.5 | 26.5 ± 1.9 | 4.7 | 523.3 ± 25 | 36.1 ± 1.2 |
| S13 | 36.5 ± 1.6 | 13.7 ± 2.5 | 26.8 ± 1.7 | 4.3 | 236.6 ± 32 | 36.4 ± 0.9 |
| S14 | 33.3 ± 2.2 | 14.4 ± 2.5 | 26.7 ± 1.7 | 5.4 | 800 ± 100 | 34.1 ± 0.8 |
| S15 | 33.3 ± 2.2 | 14.4 ± 2.5 | 26.2 ± 1.7 | 5.5 | 226.6 ± 40 | 29.4 ± 0.5 |
| S16 | 27.05 ± 2.4 | 13.3 ± 2.5 | 26.2 ± 1.9 | 6.4 | 5 ± 0 | 30.0 ± 1.9 |
Salinity is reported based on the annual averages of 2018 (±s.d.); temperature on the average of November and December in 2018 (±s.d.), i.e. the period in which the sampling was conducted, and on the average for the summer months (June, July, August), the most relevant for parasite transmission. (Copernicus dataset, http://marine.copernicus.eu).
Fig. 2.Local parasite richness per station (A) and mean parasite richness per mussel individual (i.e. infra-community richness; B) at each of the 16 sampling stations from east (S1) to west (S16) in the North Adriatic Sea. In (a) the presence of each one parasite species is considered as 1. Error bars in (B) represent the SE.
Fig. 3.Prevalence (A) and mean abundance (B) of the four most common parasite species found in Mytilus galloprovincialis mussels collected during the sampling (n = 20 mussels at each station): Parvatrema duboisi, Mytilicola sp. Eugymnanthea inquilina and Urastoma cyprinae. Prevalence is calculated as proportion of infected individuals (between 0 and 1). All plots are based on sampling station arranged from east (S1) to west (S16) of the Northern Adriatic Sea. Error bars represent the SE. Notice the different scale for Mytilicola sp. and Urastoma cyprinae abundance.
Summary table of the relative contribution (Akaike weights) of the drivers to mean parasite richness per mussel individual, prevalence (for Parvatrema duboisi, Eugymnanthea inquilina, Mytilicola sp., Urastoma cyprinae) and abundance (for P. duboisi and E. inquilina), determined based on the average model with a threshold of AICc <2
| Mussel size (mm) | Mussel density (# per 50 × 50 cm plot) | Local parasite richness ( | TRIX | Salinity | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richness | Species richness per mussel individual | 0.76 | 0.51 | – | 0.15 | |
| Prevalence | – | 0.27 | NA | – | ||
| 0.17 | 0.13 | NA | 0.36 | |||
| 0.43 | 0.33 | NA | – | – | ||
| 0.28 | 0.21 | NA | – | |||
| Abundance | – | – | NA | – | ||
| 0.23 | 0.16 | NA | 0.47 |
Note: The drivers included in the model were biotic: mussel size, mussel population density, local richness, and abiotic: salinity and TRIX (indicator of the eutrophication status). The contributions of the most relevant drivers are presented in larger font and in bold. Drivers not added for testing in a model are indicated with NA.