Literature DB >> 34380169

Fast-Tracking Health Data Standards Development and Adoption in Real-World Settings: A Pilot Approach.

Allison F Dennis1, P Jon White2,3, Teresa Zayas-Cabán1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pilot-testing is important in standards development because it facilitates agile navigation of the gap between needs for and use of standards in real-world settings and can reveal the practicalities of implementation. As the implementation and use of health data standards are usually more complicated than anticipated, the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) routinely oversees and organizes relevant pilot projects.
OBJECTIVES: This article provides an in-depth look into a sample of ONC's standards-focused pilot projects to (1) inform readers of the complexities of developing, implementing, and advancing standards and (2) guide those seeking to evaluate new standards through pilot projects.
METHODS: The ONC's approach to conducting pilot projects begins with identifying a clinical care need, research requirement, or policy outcome that is not well supported by existing standards through a landscape review. ONC then selects a testing approach based on the identified need and maturity of relevant standards. Next, ONC identifies use cases and sites to pilot-test the relevant standard. Once complete, ONC publishes a report that informs subsequent projects and standards development.
RESULTS: Pilot projects presented here are organized into three categories related to their demonstrated focus and related approach: (1) improving standards for presenting and sharing clinical genetic data, (2) accelerating the development and implementation of new standards, and (3) facilitating clinical data reuse. Each project illustrates the pilot approach from inception to next steps, capturing the role of collaboration among standards development organizations, stakeholders, and end-users to ensure standards are practical and fit for purpose.
CONCLUSION: The ONC approach identifies implementation difficulties prior to broader adoption and use of standards, and provides insight into the steps needed to scale use of standards. The ONC's organization of pilot projects serves as a natural accelerator for building communities of practice, often providing a well-connected beneficiary of lessons learned. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34380169      PMCID: PMC8357460          DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1731677

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Clin Inform        ISSN: 1869-0327            Impact factor:   2.762


  35 in total

1.  The organizational structure and governing principles of the Food and Drug Administration's Mini-Sentinel pilot program.

Authors:  Susan Forrow; Daniel M Campion; Lisa J Herrinton; Vinit P Nair; Melissa A Robb; Marcus Wilson; Richard Platt
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.890

2.  Translating standards into practice: experiences and lessons learned in biomedicine and health care.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Chen; Genevieve B Melton; Indra Neil Sarkar
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2012-06-30       Impact factor: 6.317

3.  The effect of health information technology on quality in U.S. hospitals.

Authors:  Jeffrey S McCullough; Michelle Casey; Ira Moscovice; Shailendra Prasad
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 6.301

4.  Meeting the challenge: Health information technology's essential role in achieving precision medicine.

Authors:  Teresa Zayas-Cabán; Kevin J Chaney; Courtney C Rogers; Joshua C Denny; P Jon White
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2021-06-12       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  National health information technology priorities for research: A policy and development agenda.

Authors:  Teresa Zayas-Cabán; Kevin J Chaney; Donald W Rucker
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda.

Authors:  Enola Proctor; Hiie Silmere; Ramesh Raghavan; Peter Hovmand; Greg Aarons; Alicia Bunger; Richard Griffey; Melissa Hensley
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2011-03

Review 7.  Measuring value for money: a scoping review on economic evaluation of health information systems.

Authors:  Jesdeep Bassi; Francis Lau
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  Quality Enhancement Research Initiative Implementation Roadmap: Toward Sustainability of Evidence-based Practices in a Learning Health System.

Authors:  Amy M Kilbourne; David E Goodrich; Isomi Miake-Lye; Melissa Z Braganza; Nicholas W Bowersox
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Outcomes From Health Information Exchange: Systematic Review and Future Research Needs.

Authors:  William R Hersh; Annette M Totten; Karen B Eden; Beth Devine; Paul Gorman; Steven Z Kassakian; Susan S Woods; Monica Daeges; Miranda Pappas; Marian S McDonagh
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2015-12-15

10.  The Use of Clinical Registries in the United States: A Landscape Survey.

Authors:  Seth Blumenthal
Journal:  EGEMS (Wash DC)       Date:  2017-12-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.