| Literature DB >> 34377620 |
Yoon Soo Kim1, Byeong Seok Kim1, Ho Sung Kim1, Seok Kyung In1, Hyung Suk Yi1, Hong Il Kim1, Jin Hyung Park1, Hyo Young Kim1.
Abstract
Upper blepharoplasty in elderly patients has characteristics that differ from those of younger patients. Blepharoptosis in elderly patients causes not only aesthetic problems but also functional problems such as entropion, visual disturbance, and sore eyes. We hypothesized that factors influencing patient satisfaction with upper blepharoplasty in elderly patients include aesthetic outcomes, functional outcomes, and personal factors.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34377620 PMCID: PMC8345909 DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003727
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open ISSN: 2169-7574
Sociodemographic Characteristics of Included Patients
| Contents | N (%) | Mean ± SD |
|---|---|---|
| Gender | ||
| Men | 15 (26.3) | |
| Women | 42 (73.7) | |
| Age (y) | 73.77 ± 4.94 | |
| 65–69 | 16 (28.1) | |
| 70–79 | 33 (57.9) | |
| 80–89 | 8 (14.0) | |
| Medical level | ||
| Medical benefits | 8 (14.0) | |
| Health insurance | 49 (86.0) | |
| Education | ||
| Uneducated | 1 (1.8) | |
| Elementary school | 23 (40.3) | |
| Middle school | 27 (47.4) | |
| High school | 6 (10.5) | |
| Medical history | ||
| Hypertension | 26 (45.6) | |
| Diabetes | 7 (12.3) | |
| Main symptom of discomfort | ||
| Sagging skin of the upper eyelids | 21 (36.8) | |
| Eyelashes poke the pupils due to entropion | 5 (8.8) | |
| Visual disturbances | 4 (7.0) | |
| Wrinkles around the eyes | 3 (5.3) | |
| Abnormal eyebrow position | 11 (19.3) | |
| Sore eyes | 13 (22.8) |
Satisfaction with Upper Blepharoplasty in Elderly Patients at Six Months Postoperative
| n (%) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Very Negative (score = 1) | Negative (2) | Neither Positive nor Negative (3) | Positive (4) | Very Positive (5) | Mean Score (SD) | |
| Are you satisfied with the overall treatment outcome? | 1 (1.8) | 2 (3.5) | 10 (17.5) | 31 (54.4) | 13 (22.8) | 3.93 (0.84) |
| Has your quality of life improved after treatment? | 0 (0.0) | 2 (3.5) | 4 (7.0) | 29 (50.9) | 22 (38.6) | 4.25 (0.74) |
| Is your eyelid as good as anticipated? | 2 (3.5) | 5 (8.8) | 10 (17.5) | 38 (66.7) | 2 (3.5) | 3.58 (0.84) |
| Are you satisfied with the speed of recovery? | 4 (7.0) | 6 (10.5) | 19 (33.4) | 22 (38.6) | 6 (10.5) | 3.35 (1.04) |
| Would you recommend the operation to a friend and family? | 1 (1.8) | 5 (8.8) | 11 (19.3) | 32 (56.1) | 8 (14.0) | 3.72 (0.88) |
| Did you achieve the goals for which you underwent the operation? | 0 (0.0) | 3 (5.2) | 9 (15.8) | 26 (45.6) | 19 (33.4) | 4.07 (0.84) |
| Are you satisfied with the outcomes related to treatment costs? | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 4 (7.0) | 19 (33.4) | 34 (59.6) | 4.53 (0.63) |
| Mean score (SD) | 3.84(0.40) | |||||
Measurement of Functional Improvement Scores
| n (%) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not Improved At All (Score = 1) | Not Improved (2) | Slightly Improved (3) | Improved (4) | Very Improved (5) | Mean Score (SD) | |
| Functional Improvement | 0 | 0 | 12 | 33 | 12 | 4.00 (0.65) |
Measurement of Aesthetic Outcomes by Two Plastic Surgeons
| n (%) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Very Negative (Score = 1) | Negative (2) | Neither Positive nor Negative (3) | Positive (4) | Very Positive (5) | Mean Score | |
| Plastic surgeon 1 | 0 | 1 | 16 | 37 | 3 | 3.74 (0.58) |
| Plastic surgeon 2 | 0 | 3 | 19 | 30 | 5 | 3.65 (0.71) |
| Total | 3.69 (0.55) | |||||
Comparison of Patient Satisfaction based on Sociodemographic Characteristics Using Independent T-test
| Dependent Variables | Group | Mean | SD | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Men | 3.93 | 0.460 | 1.000 | 0.322 |
| Women | 3.80 | 0.383 | |||
| Medical level | Medical benefits | 3.75 | 0.347 | −0.643 | 0.523 |
| Health insurance | 3.85 | 0.414 | |||
| Hypertension | Normal | 3.81 | 0.441 | −0.508 | 0.614 |
| Hypertension | 3.87 | 0.360 | |||
| Diabetes | Normal | 3.82 | 0.398 | −0.773 | 0.443 |
| Diabetes | 3.95 | 0.461 |
Comparison of Patient Satisfaction Based on Sociodemographic Characteristics Using One-way Analysis of Variance
| Variables | Group | Mean | SD | F | Scheffe | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 65–69 | 3.84 | 0.389 | 1.163 | 0.320 | — |
| 70–79 | 3.88 | 0.436 | ||||
| 80–89 | 3.64 | 0.236 | ||||
| Total | 3.84 | 0.404 | ||||
| Education | Uneducated | 3.00 | 0.000 | 0.641 | 0.592 | — |
| Elementary school | 3.22 | 0.902 | ||||
| Middle school | 3.41 | 0.931 | ||||
| High school | 2.83 | 1.329 | ||||
| Total | 3.26 | 0.955 | ||||
| Main uncomfortable symptom | Sagging skin of the upper eyelid | 3.86 | 0.359 | 0.405 | 0.843 | — |
| Eyelashes poke the pupils due to entropion | 3.83 | 0.584 | ||||
| Visual disturbances | 3.81 | 0.439 | ||||
| Wrinkles around the eyes | 4.13 | 0.000 | ||||
| Abnormal eyebrow positions | 3.75 | 0.345 | ||||
| Sore eyes | 3.82 | 0.507 | ||||
| Total | 3.84 | 0.404 |
Factors Influencing Patient Satisfaction with Upper Blepharoplasty in Elderly Patients
| Dependent Variable | Independent Variable | B | SE | β | VIF | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average satisfaction | Constant | 2.107 | 0.185 | 11.370 | 0.000 | ||
| Aesthetic outcome | 0.122 | 0.069 | 0.193 | 1.765 | 0.083 | 2.310 | |
| Functional improvement | 0.197 | 0.048 | 0.371 | 4.072 | 0.000 | 2.315 | |
| Expectations of surgical results | −0.010 | 0.037 | −0.028 | −0.277 | 0.783 | 1.055 | |
| Cognitive degree of precautions after surgery | 0.186 | 0.031 | 0.511 | 6.039 | 0.000 | 1.047 | |
| F = 39.854 ( | |||||||
*P < 0.001.
Fig. 1.Case of a 71-year-old male patient with a high aesthetic outcome score (5 points) but a low functional improvement score (3 points) and an average satisfaction score of 3.85 points. A, Preoperative photograph. B, Postoperative photograph taken 6 months after upper blepharoplasty.
Fig. 2.Case of a 72-year-old female patient with a high aesthetic outcome score (4.5 points) but a low functional improvement score (3 points) and an average satisfaction score of 3.57 points. A, Preoperative photograph. B, Postoperative photograph taken 6 months after upper blepharoplasty.
Fig. 3.Case of a 78-year-old female patient with a low aesthetic outcome score (2.5 points) but a high functional improvement score (5 points) and an average satisfaction score of 4.57 points. A, Preoperative photograph. B, Postoperative photograph taken 6 months after upper blepharoplasty.
Fig. 4.Case of a 74-year-old female patient with a low aesthetic outcome score (2.5 points) but a high functional improvement score (5 points) and an average satisfaction score of 4.71 points. A, Preoperative photograph. B, Postoperative photograph taken 6 months after upper blepharoplasty.