| Literature DB >> 34377593 |
Tomotaka Ugai1,2, Melissa Zhao1, Takashi Shimizu3, Naohiko Akimoto1, Shanshan Shi1, Yasutoshi Takashima1, Rong Zhong1, Mai Chan Lau1, Koichiro Haruki1, Kota Arima1, Kenji Fujiyoshi1, Benjamin Langworthy2, Yohei Masugi1, Annacarolina da Silva1, Katsuhiko Nosho1, Yoshifumi Baba1, Mingyang Song4,5,6, Andrew T Chan5,6,7,8, Molin Wang2,7,9, Jeffrey A Meyerhardt10, Marios Giannakis10,11,12, Juha P Väyrynen1,10,13, Jonathan A Nowak1, Shuji Ogino1,2,11,14.
Abstract
Immunotherapy targeting the CD274 (PD-L1)/PDCD1 (PD-1) immune checkpoint axis has emerged as a promising treatment strategy for various cancers. Experimental evidence suggests that phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphonate 3-kinase (PI3K) signaling may upregulate CD274 expression. Thus, we hypothesized that PIK3CA mutation, PTEN loss, or their combined status might be associated with CD274 overexpression in colorectal carcinoma. We assessed tumor CD274 and PTEN expression by immunohistochemistry and assessed PIK3CA mutation by pyrosequencing in 753 patients among 4,465 incident rectal and colon cancer cases that had occurred in two U.S.-wide prospective cohort studies. To adjust for potential confounders and selection bias due to tissue availability, inverse probability weighted multivariable ordinal logistic regression analyses used the 4,465 cases and tumoral data including microsatellite instability, CpG island methylator phenotype, KRAS and BRAF mutations. PIK3CA mutation and loss of PTEN expression were detected in 111 of 753 cases (15%) and 342 of 585 cases (58%), respectively. Tumor CD274 expression was negative in 306 (41%), low in 195 (26%), and high in 252 (33%) of 753 cases. PTEN loss was associated with CD274 overexpression [multivariable odds ratio (OR) 1.83; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.22-2.75; P = .004]. PIK3CA mutation was statistically-insignificantly (P = .036 with the stringent alpha level of 0.005) associated with CD274 overexpression (multivariable OR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.03-2.31). PIK3CA-mutated PTEN-lost tumors (n = 33) showed higher prevalence of CD274-positivity (82%) than PIK3CA-wild-type PTEN-lost tumors (n = 204; 70% CD274-positivity) and PTEN-expressed tumors (n = 147; 50% CD274-positivity) (P = .003). Our findings support the role of PI3K signaling in the CD274/PDCD1 pathway.Entities:
Keywords: Colorectal neoplasms; PI3K pathway; immune checkpoint; molecular pathological epidemiology; tumor microenvironment
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34377593 PMCID: PMC8331006 DOI: 10.1080/2162402X.2021.1956173
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncoimmunology ISSN: 2162-4011 Impact factor: 8.110
Figure 1.Flow diagram of study population in the nurses’ health study and the health professionals follow-up study
Figure 2.Tumor CD274 and PTEN expression in colorectal cancer. Tumor CD274 expression was evaluated based on immunostaining in the cytoplasm and membrane of tumor cells. Tumor CD274 expression was interpreted as negative (a), low (b), or high (c) according to membranous and cytoplasmic intensity. Tumor PTEN expression was evaluated based on immunostaining in the cytoplasm and nuclear of tumor cells. Cytoplasmic and nuclear PTEN expression level was classified as lost (d) or intact (e) according to cytoplasmic and nuclear intensity. Scale bars represent 50 μm
Clinical, pathological, and molecular characteristics of colorectal cancer cases according to PIK3CA mutation and PTEN expression in tumor tissue
| PTEN expression | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Characteristic* | All cases | Wild-type | Mutant | Intact | Lost | ||
| Sex | 0.34 | 0.40 | |||||
| Male (HPFS) | 342 (45%) | 287 (45%) | 55 (50%) | 103 (42%) | 133 (39%) | ||
| Female (NHS) | 411 (55%) | 355 (55%) | 56 (50%) | 140 (58%) | 209 (61%) | ||
| Mean age ± SD, (years) | 69.4 ± 9.0 | 69.3 ± 9.0 | 70.1 ± 8.6 | 0.39 | 68.4 ± 7.2 | 67.1 ± 8.8 | 0.069 |
| Year of diagnosis | 0.82 | 0.73 | |||||
| 1995 or before | 228 (30%) | 197 (31%) | 31 (28%) | 105 (43%) | 140 (41%) | ||
| 1996–2000 | 249 (33%) | 212 (33%) | 37 (33%) | 86 (35%) | 132 (39%) | ||
| 2001–2012 | 276 (37%) | 233 (36%) | 43 (39%) | 52 (21%) | 70 (20%) | ||
| Family history of colorectal cancer in first-degree relative(s) | 0.51 | 0.38 | |||||
| Absent | 591 (79%) | 507 (80%) | 84 (77%) | 184 (77%) | 271 (80%) | ||
| Present | 153 (21%) | 128 (20%) | 25 (23%) | 56 (23%) | 69 (20%) | ||
| Tumor location | 0.018 | 0.67 | |||||
| Cecum | 132 (18%) | 107 (17%) | 25 (23%) | 42 (17%) | 69 (20%) | ||
| Ascending to transverse colon | 238 (32%) | 198 (31%) | 40 (36%) | 79 (33%) | 103 (30%) | ||
| Descending to sigmoid colon | 223 (30%) | 188 (29%) | 35 (32%) | 68 (28%) | 103 (30%) | ||
| Rectum | 156 (21%) | 145 (23%) | 11 (9.9%) | 53 (22%) | 66 (19%) | ||
| Tumor differentiation | 0.43 | 0.90 | |||||
| Well to modulate | 682 (91%) | 579 (90%) | 103 (93%) | 220 (91%) | 311 (91%) | ||
| Poor | 69 (9.2%) | 61 (9.5%) | 8 (7.2%) | 22 (9.1%) | 30 (8.8%) | ||
| AJCC disease stage | 0.85 | 0.63 | |||||
| I | 160 (23%) | 134 (23%) | 26 (25%) | 60 (27%) | 77 (24%) | ||
| II | 224 (32%) | 190 (32%) | 34 (32%) | 69 (31%) | 113 (35%) | ||
| III | 211 (30%) | 183 (31%) | 28 (27%) | 62 (28%) | 97 (30%) | ||
| IV | 105 (15%) | 88 (15%) | 17 (16%) | 32 (14%) | 40 (12%) | ||
| Mean LINE-1 methylation level (%) | 62.5 ± 9.7 | 62.2 ± 9.9 | 64.2 ± 8.7 | 0.043 | 62.7 ± 8.9 | 61.3 ± 10.0 | 0.078 |
| MSI status | 0.65 | 0.24 | |||||
| Non-MSI-high | 619 (83%) | 525 (83%) | 94 (85%) | 190 (82%) | 288 (85%) | ||
| MSI-high | 125 (17%) | 108 (17%) | 17 (15%) | 43 (18%) | 50 (15%) | ||
| CIMP status | 0.36 | 0.071 | |||||
| Low/negative | 578 (83%) | 497 (83%) | 81 (79%) | 193 (81%) | 292 (87%) | ||
| High | 122 (17%) | 101 (17%) | 21 (21%) | 45 (19%) | 45 (13%) | ||
| <0.001 | 0.95 | ||||||
| Wild-type | 446 (60%) | 398 (63%) | 48 (43%) | 136 (57%) | 190 (57%) | ||
| Mutant | 298 (40%) | 235 (37%) | 63 (57%) | 102 (43%) | 144 (43%) | ||
| 0.83 | 0.027 | ||||||
| Wild-type | 635 (85%) | 540 (85%) | 95 (86%) | 195 (82%) | 298 (88%) | ||
| Mutant | 113 (15%) | 97 (15%) | 16 (14%) | 44 (18%) | 40 (12%) | ||
| CD274 (PD-L1) expression score | 0.095 | <0.001 | |||||
| Negative | 306 (41%) | 268 (42%) | 38 (34%) | 78 (49%) | 78 (28%) | ||
| Low | 195 (26%) | 166 (26%) | 29 (26%) | 33 (21%) | 79 (29%) | ||
| High | 252 (33%) | 208 (32%) | 44 (40%) | 48 (30%) | 117 (43%) | ||
| PTEN expression | 0.83 | ||||||
| Intact | 222 (43%) | 184 (42%) | 38 (44%) | ||||
| Lost | 299 (57%) | 250 (58%) | 49 (56%) | ||||
* (%) indicates the proportion of patients with a specific clinical, pathologic, or molecular characteristic among all patients or in strata of PIK3CA mutation or PTEN expression.
†To compare categorical data between PIK3CA mutation or PTEN expression categories, the chi-square test was performed. To compare continuous variables, an analysis of variance was performed.
Abbreviations: AJCC, American Joint Committee on Cancer; CIMP, CpG island methylator phenotype; HPFS, Health Professionals Follow-up Study; LINE-1, long interspersed nucleotide element-1; MSI, microsatellite instability; NHS, Nurses’ Health Study; PD-L1, programmed cell death 1 ligand 1; SD, standard deviation.
Inverse probability weighting-adjusted ordinal logistic regression analysis to assess the association of tumor PIK3CA mutation or PTEN expression (predictor) with CD274 (PD-L1) expression (outcome)
| Characteristic | CD274 (PD-L1) expression | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Univariable | Multivariable | |||
| Wild-type (N = 642) | 1 (referent) | 1 (referent) | ||
| Mutant (N = 111) | 1.53 (1.01–2.31) | 0.045 | 1.54 (1.03–2.31) | 0.036 |
| MSI status | ||||
| Non-MSI-high (N = 619) | 1 (referent) | 1 (referent) | ||
| MSI-high (N = 125) | 0.60 (0.41–0.89) | 0.010 | 0.63 (0.42–0.93) | 0.022 |
| Year of diagnosis (per 5-year increase) | 0.85 (0.74–0.97) | 0.018 | 0.86 (0.75–0.98) | 0.027 |
| PTEN expression | ||||
| Intact (N = 243) | 1 (referent) | 1 (referent) | ||
| Lost (N = 342) | 1.88 (1.24–2.84) | 0.003 | 1.83 (1.22–2.75) | 0.004 |
| MSI status | ||||
| Non-MSI-high (N = 478) | 1 (referent) | 1 (referent) | ||
| MSI-high (N = 93) | 0.38 (0.22–0.65) | <0.001 | 0.46 (0.26–0.82) | 0.008 |
| AJCC disease stage | ||||
| I to II (N = 319) | 1 (referent) | 1 (referent) | ||
| III to IV (N = 231) | 1.78 (1.21–2.63) | 0.004 | 1.62 (1.09–2.43) | 0.019 |
| Year of diagnosis (per 5-year increase) | 0.77 (0.63–0.94) | 0.010 | 0.79 (0.65–0.96) | 0.027 |
* IPW was applied to reduce selection bias due to the availability of tumor tissue.
†The multivariable ordinal logistic regression model initially included sex, age, year of diagnosis, tumor differentiation, disease stage, family history of colorectal cancer, tumor location, microsatellite instability, CpG island methylator phenotype, long-interspersed nucleotide element-1 methylation level, KRAS mutation and BRAF mutation. A backward elimination with a threshold P of 0.05 was used to select variables for the final models. The variables which remained in the final models are shown in this table.
Abbreviations: AJCC, American Joint Committee on Cancer; CI, confidence interval; IPW, inverse probability weighting; MSI, microsatellite instability; OR, odds ratio; PD-L1, programmed cell death 1 ligand 1.
CD274 (PD-L1) expression score according to PIK3CA mutation and PTEN expression in tumor tissue
| Characteristic* | All cases | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CD274 (PD-L1) expression score | 0.003 | |||||
| Negative | 140 (36%) | 61 (50%) | 12 (50%) | 61 (30%) | 6 (18%) | |
| Low | 100 (26%) | 26 (21%) | 5 (20%) | 58 (28%) | 11 (33%) | |
| High | 144 (38%) | 36 (29%) | 7 (29%) | 85 (42%) | 16 (48%) | |
* (%) indicates the proportion of patients with a specific CD274 expression score category among all patients or in strata of PIK3CA mutation and PTEN expression.
†To compare categorical data between PIK3CA mutation and PTEN expression categories, the chi-square test was performed.
Abbreviations: PD-L1, programmed cell death 1 ligand 1.
Inverse probability weighting-adjusted ordinal logistic regression analysis to assess the association of the combination of PIK3CA mutation and PTEN expression (predictor) with CD274 (PD-L1) expression (outcome)
| Characteristic | CD274 (PD-L1) expression | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Univariable | Multivariable | |||
| Combination of | ||||
| 1 (referent) | 1 (referent) | |||
| 1.49 (0.59–3.77) | 0.40 | 1.56 (0.63–3.86) | 0.33 | |
| 1.97 (1.23–3.16) | 0.005 | 1.90 (1.19–3.06) | 0.008 | |
| 3.53 (1.55–8.07) | 0.003 | 3.70 (1.68–8.19) | 0.001 | |
| MSI status | ||||
| Non-MSI-high (N = 322) | 1 (referent) | 1 (referent) | ||
| MSI-high (N = 63) | 0.35 (0.21–0.61) | <0.001 | 0.35 (0.20–0.62) | <0.001 |
* IPW was applied to reduce selection bias due to the availability of tumor tissue.
†The multivariable ordinal logistic regression model initially included sex, age, year of diagnosis, tumor differentiation, disease stage, family history of colorectal cancer, tumor location, microsatellite instability, CpG island methylator phenotype, long-interspersed nucleotide element-1 methylation level, KRAS mutation and BRAF mutation. A backward elimination with a threshold P of 0.05 was used to select variables for the final models.
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; IPW, inverse probability weighting; MSI, microsatellite instability; OR, odds ratio; PD-L1, programmed cell death 1 ligand 1.