Literature DB >> 18710985

Dual-targeted contrast agent for US assessment of tumor angiogenesis in vivo.

Jürgen K Willmann1, Amelie M Lutz, Ramasamy Paulmurugan, Manishkumar R Patel, Pauline Chu, Jarrett Rosenberg, Sanjiv S Gambhir.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop and validate a dual-targeted ultrasonographic (US) imaging agent with microbubbles (MBs) that attaches to both vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor 2 (VEGFR2) and alpha(v)beta(3) integrin and to compare the US imaging signal obtained from dual-targeted MBs (MB(D)) with that from single-targeted MBs (MB(S)) in a murine model of tumor angiogenesis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Animal protocols were approved by the institutional Administrative Panel on Laboratory Animal Care. Single- and dual-targeted US imaging agents were prepared by attaching anti-VEGFR2, anti-alpha(v)beta(3) integrin, or both antibodies to the shell of perfluorocarbon-filled MBs. Binding specificities of targeted MBs compared with isotype-matched immunoglobulin G-labeled control MBs (MB(C)) and nontargeted nonlabeled MBs (MB(N)) were tested with VEGFR2-positive and alpha(v)beta(3) integrin-positive cells (mouse SVR cells) and control cells (mouse 4T1 cells). In vivo imaging signals of contrast material-enhanced US by using anti-VEGFR2-targeted MBs (MB(V)), anti-alpha(v)beta(3) integrin-targeted MBs (MB(I)), MB(D), and MB(C) were quantified in 49 mice bearing SK-OV-3 tumors (human ovarian cancer). Tumor tissue was stained for VEGFR2, alpha(v)beta(3) integrin, and CD31.
RESULTS: Attachment of MB(D) to SVR cells (mean, 0.74 MBs per cell +/- 0.05 [standard deviation]) was significantly higher than attachment to 4T1 cells (mean, 0.04 +/- 0.03), and attachment to SVR cells was higher for MB(D) than for MB(V) (mean, 0.58 +/- 0.09), MB(I) (mean, 0.42 +/- 0.21), MB(C) (mean, 0.11 +/- 0.13), and MB(N) (mean, 0.01 +/- 0.01) (P < .05). Imaging signal in the murine tumor angiogenesis model was significantly higher (P < .001) for MB(D) (mean, 16.7 +/- 7.2) than for MB(V) (mean, 11.3 +/- 5.7), MB(I) (mean, 7.8 +/- 5.3), MB(C) (mean, 2.8 +/- 0.9), and MB(N) (mean, 1.1 +/- 0.4). Immunofluorescence confirmed expression of VEGFR2 and alpha(v)beta(3) integrin on tumor vasculature.
CONCLUSION: Dual-targeted contrast-enhanced US directed at both VEGFR2 and alpha(v)beta(3) integrin improves in vivo visualization of tumor angiogenesis in a human ovarian cancer xenograft tumor model in mice. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/full/248/3/936/DC1. RSNA, 2008

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18710985      PMCID: PMC2798094          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2483072231

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  23 in total

Review 1.  Function and interactions of integrins.

Authors:  A van der Flier; A Sonnenberg
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.249

Review 2.  Role of integrins in cell invasion and migration.

Authors:  John D Hood; David A Cheresh
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 60.716

3.  Interplay between rolling and firm adhesion elucidated with a cell-free system engineered with two distinct receptor-ligand pairs.

Authors:  A Omolola Eniola; P Jeanene Willcox; Daniel A Hammer
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 4.  The implications of angiogenesis for the biology and therapy of cancer metastasis.

Authors:  I J Fidler; L M Ellis
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1994-10-21       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 5.  Tumor angiogenesis: therapeutic implications.

Authors:  J Folkman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1971-11-18       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 6.  Role of the vascular endothelial growth factor pathway in tumor growth and angiogenesis.

Authors:  Daniel J Hicklin; Lee M Ellis
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-12-07       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Ultrasonic imaging of tumor angiogenesis using contrast microbubbles targeted via the tumor-binding peptide arginine-arginine-leucine.

Authors:  Gregory E R Weller; Michael K K Wong; Ruth A Modzelewski; Erxiong Lu; Alexander L Klibanov; William R Wagner; Flordeliza S Villanueva
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2005-01-15       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Imaging tumor angiogenesis with contrast ultrasound and microbubbles targeted to alpha(v)beta3.

Authors:  Dilantha B Ellegala; Howard Leong-Poi; Joan E Carpenter; Alexander L Klibanov; Sanjiv Kaul; Mark E Shaffrey; Jiri Sklenar; Jonathan R Lindner
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-06-30       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 9.  Tumorigenesis and the angiogenic switch.

Authors:  Gabriele Bergers; Laura E Benjamin
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 60.716

10.  Bevacizumab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Herbert Hurwitz; Louis Fehrenbacher; William Novotny; Thomas Cartwright; John Hainsworth; William Heim; Jordan Berlin; Ari Baron; Susan Griffing; Eric Holmgren; Napoleone Ferrara; Gwen Fyfe; Beth Rogers; Robert Ross; Fairooz Kabbinavar
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-06-03       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  77 in total

Review 1.  Molecular body imaging: MR imaging, CT, and US. part I. principles.

Authors:  Moritz F Kircher; Jürgen K Willmann
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  scVEGF microbubble ultrasound contrast agents: a novel probe for ultrasound molecular imaging of tumor angiogenesis.

Authors:  Christopher R Anderson; Joshua J Rychak; Marina Backer; Joseph Backer; Klaus Ley; Alexander L Klibanov
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 6.016

3.  Molecular ultrasound imaging and its potential for paediatric radiology.

Authors:  Isabel Kiessling; Jessica Bzyl; Fabian Kiessling
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2010-08-03

Review 4.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for molecular imaging of angiogenesis.

Authors:  J R Eisenbrey; F Forsberg
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Lipid membrane editing with peptide cargo linkers in cells and synthetic nanostructures.

Authors:  Hua Pan; Jacob W Myerson; Olena Ivashyna; Neelesh R Soman; Jon N Marsh; Joshua L Hood; Gregory M Lanza; Paul H Schlesinger; Samuel A Wickline
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 6.  Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasonography.

Authors:  Nischita K Reddy; Ana Maria Ioncică; Adrian Săftoiu; Peter Vilmann; Manoop S Bhutani
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 7.  Leveraging the power of ultrasound for therapeutic design and optimization.

Authors:  Charles F Caskey; Xiaowen Hu; Katherine W Ferrara
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2011-07-30       Impact factor: 9.776

8.  Evidence of angiogenic vessels in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Brinda S Desai; Julie A Schneider; Jia-Liang Li; Paul M Carvey; Bill Hendey
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2009-04-16       Impact factor: 3.575

9.  Ultrasound molecular imaging in a human CD276 expression-modulated murine ovarian cancer model.

Authors:  Amelie M Lutz; Sunitha V Bachawal; Charles W Drescher; Marybeth A Pysz; Jürgen K Willmann; Sanjiv Sam Gambhir
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  Combination-targeting to multiple endothelial cell adhesion molecules modulates binding, endocytosis, and in vivo biodistribution of drug nanocarriers and their therapeutic cargoes.

Authors:  Iason Papademetriou; Zois Tsinas; Janet Hsu; Silvia Muro
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 9.776

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.