Literature DB >> 34376268

Test-Retest Reliability of a Semi-Structured Interview to Aid in Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury Diagnosis.

Danielle C Hergert1, Veronik Sicard1, David D Stephenson1, Sharvani Pabbathi Reddy1, Cidney R Robertson-Benta1, Andrew B Dodd1, Edward J Bedrick2, Gerard A Gioia3,4, Timothy B Meier5, Nicholas A Shaff1, Davin K Quinn6, Richard A Campbell6, John P Phillips1,7, Andrei A Vakhtin1, Robert E Sapien8, Andrew R Mayer1,6,7,9.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Retrospective self-report is typically used for diagnosing previous pediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI). A new semi-structured interview instrument (New Mexico Assessment of Pediatric TBI; NewMAP TBI) investigated test-retest reliability for TBI characteristics in both the TBI that qualified for study inclusion and for lifetime history of TBI.
METHOD: One-hundred and eight-four mTBI (aged 8-18), 156 matched healthy controls (HC), and their parents completed the NewMAP TBI within 11 days (subacute; SA) and 4 months (early chronic; EC) of injury, with a subset returning at 1 year (late chronic; LC).
RESULTS: The test-retest reliability of common TBI characteristics [loss of consciousness (LOC), post-traumatic amnesia (PTA), retrograde amnesia, confusion/disorientation] and post-concussion symptoms (PCS) were examined across study visits. Aside from PTA, binary reporting (present/absent) for all TBI characteristics exhibited acceptable (≥0.60) test-retest reliability for both Qualifying and Remote TBIs across all three visits. In contrast, reliability for continuous data (exact duration) was generally unacceptable, with LOC and PCS meeting acceptable criteria at only half of the assessments. Transforming continuous self-report ratings into discrete categories based on injury severity resulted in acceptable reliability. Reliability was not strongly affected by the parent completing the NewMAP TBI.
CONCLUSIONS: Categorical reporting of TBI characteristics in children and adolescents can aid clinicians in retrospectively obtaining reliable estimates of TBI severity up to a year post-injury. However, test-retest reliability is strongly impacted by the initial data distribution, selected statistical methods, and potentially by patient difficulty in distinguishing among conceptually similar medical concepts (i.e., PTA vs. confusion).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescent; Brain concussion; Pediatrics; Self-reports; Test–retest reliability; Traumatic brain injury

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34376268      PMCID: PMC8831656          DOI: 10.1017/S1355617721000928

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc        ISSN: 1355-6177            Impact factor:   3.114


  55 in total

1.  The epidemiology of new versus recurrent sports concussions among high school athletes, 2005-2010.

Authors:  Lianne Castile; Christy L Collins; Natalie M McIlvain; R Dawn Comstock
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 13.800

2.  The efficiency and accuracy of the Test of Memory Malingering trial 1, errors on the first 10 items of the test of memory malingering, and five embedded measures in predicting invalid test performance.

Authors:  John H Denning
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 2.813

3.  Assessment of post-traumatic amnesia after severe closed head injury: retrospective or prospective?

Authors:  T M McMillan; E L Jongen; R J Greenwood
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 10.154

4.  Structured interview for mild traumatic brain injury after military blast: inter-rater agreement and development of diagnostic algorithm.

Authors:  William C Walker; David X Cifu; Anne M Hudak; Gary Goldberg; Richard D Kunz; Adam P Sima
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 5.269

5.  The acute period of recovery from traumatic brain injury: posttraumatic amnesia or posttraumatic confusional state?

Authors:  D T Stuss; M A Binns; F G Carruth; B Levine; C E Brandys; R J Moulton; W G Snow; M L Schwartz
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 6.  The spectrum of mild traumatic brain injury: A review.

Authors:  Andrew R Mayer; Davin K Quinn; Christina L Master
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  How valid is a self reported 12 month sports injury history?

Authors:  B J Gabbe; C F Finch; K L Bennell; H Wajswelner
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 13.800

8.  Consistency of traumatic brain injury reporting in older adults with and without cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Kristin Wilmoth; Christian LoBue; Matthew A Clem; Rajadhar Reddy; Linda S Hynan; Nyaz Didehbani; Kathleen Bell; Kyle B Womack; John Hart; Hunt Batjer; C Munro Cullum
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 3.535

9.  Longitudinal trajectories of postconcussive symptoms in children with mild traumatic brain injuries and their relationship to acute clinical status.

Authors:  Keith Owen Yeates; H Gerry Taylor; Jerome Rusin; Barbara Bangert; Ann Dietrich; Kathryn Nuss; Martha Wright; Daniel S Nagin; Bobby L Jones
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 7.124

10.  The Nature and Clinical Significance of Preinjury Recall Bias Following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Noah D Silverberg; Grant L Iverson; Jeffrey R Brubacher; Elizabeth Holland; Lisa Casagrande Hoshino; Angela Aquino; Rael T Lange
Journal:  J Head Trauma Rehabil       Date:  2016 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 2.710

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.