Literature DB >> 34374032

Energy, Data, and Decision-Making: a Scoping Review-the 3D Commission.

Nason Maani1,2,3, Grace Robbins2,3, Shaffi Fazaludeen Koya2,3, Opeyemi Babajide3, Salma M Abdalla4,5, Sandro Galea2,3.   

Abstract

Access to energy is an important social determinant of health, and expanding the availability of affordable, clean energy is one of the Sustainable Development Goals. It has been argued that climate mitigation policies can, if well-designed in response to contextual factors, also achieve environmental, economic, and social progress, but otherwise pose risks to economic inequity generally and health inequity specifically. Decisions around such policies are hampered by data gaps, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and among vulnerable populations in high-income countries (HICs). The rise of "big data" offers the potential to address some of these gaps. This scoping review sought to explore the literature linking energy, big data, health, and decision-making.Literature searches in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were conducted. English language articles up to April 1, 2020, were included. Pre-agreed study characteristics including geographic location, data collected, and study design were extracted and presented descriptively, and a qualitative thematic analysis was performed on the articles using NVivo.Thirty-nine articles fulfilled eligibility criteria. These included a combination of review articles and research articles using primary or secondary data sources. The articles described health and economic effects of a wide range of energy types and uses, and attempted to model effects of a range of technological and policy innovations, in a variety of geographic contexts. Key themes identified in our analysis included the link between energy consumption and economic development, the role of inequality in understanding and predicting harms and benefits associated with energy production and use, the lack of available data on LMICs in general, and on the local contexts within them in particular. Examples of using "big data," and areas in which the articles themselves described challenges with data limitations, were identified.The findings of this scoping review demonstrate the challenges decision-makers face in achieving energy efficiency gains and reducing emissions, while avoiding the exacerbation of existing inequities. Understanding how to maximize gains in energy efficiency and uptake of new technologies requires a deeper understanding of how work and life is shaped by socioeconomic inequalities between and within countries. This is particularly the case for LMICs and in local contexts where few data are currently available, and for whom existing evidence may not be directly applicable. Big data approaches may offer some value in tracking the uptake of new approaches, provide greater data granularity, and help compensate for evidence gaps in low resource settings.
© 2021. The New York Academy of Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Data; Energy; Global health; Inequity; Policy; Public health

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34374032      PMCID: PMC8440708          DOI: 10.1007/s11524-021-00563-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urban Health        ISSN: 1099-3460            Impact factor:   5.801


  44 in total

1.  Quantifying the human health benefits of curbing air pollution in Shanghai.

Authors:  Jia Li; Sarath K Guttikunda; Gregory R Carmichael; David G Streets; Young-Soo Chang; Virginia Fung
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 6.789

2.  Effect of air pollution control on mortality and hospital admissions in Ireland.

Authors:  Douglas W Dockery; David Q Rich; Patrick G Goodman; Luke Clancy; Pamela Ohman-Strickland; Prethibha George; Tania Kotlov
Journal:  Res Rep Health Eff Inst       Date:  2013-07

3.  RETRACTED ARTICLE: The global inequalities and climate change.

Authors:  Umair Khan; Yongan Zhang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Using Medicare data to identify individuals who are electricity dependent to improve disaster preparedness and response.

Authors:  Karen DeSalvo; Nicole Lurie; Kristen Finne; Chris Worrall; Alina Bogdanov; Ayame Dinkler; Sarah Babcock; Jeffrey Kelman
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Data analytics for simplifying thermal efficiency planning in cities.

Authors:  Mohammad Javad Abdolhosseini Qomi; Arash Noshadravan; Jake M Sobstyl; Jameson Toole; Joseph Ferreira; Roland J-M Pellenq; Franz-Josef Ulm; Marta C Gonzalez
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Health impact assessment of PM2.5 from a planned coal-fired power plant in Taiwan.

Authors:  Chia-Pin Chio; Wei-Cheng Lo; Ben-Jei Tsuang; Chieh-Chun Hu; Kai-Chen Ku; Yung-Jen Chen; Hsien-Ho Lin; Chang-Chuan Chan
Journal:  J Formos Med Assoc       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  Oil Price Uncertainty, Transport Fuel Demand and Public Health.

Authors:  Ling-Yun He; Sheng Yang; Dongfeng Chang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Estimating State-Specific Contributions to PM2.5- and O3-Related Health Burden from Residential Combustion and Electricity Generating Unit Emissions in the United States.

Authors:  Stefani L Penn; Saravanan Arunachalam; Matthew Woody; Wendy Heiger-Bernays; Yorghos Tripodis; Jonathan I Levy
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  A global perspective on coal-fired power plants and burden of lung cancer.

Authors:  Cheng-Kuan Lin; Ro-Ting Lin; Tom Chen; Corwin Zigler; Yaguang Wei; David C Christiani
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 5.984

10.  Cleaner fuels for ships provide public health benefits with climate tradeoffs.

Authors:  Mikhail Sofiev; James J Winebrake; Lasse Johansson; Edward W Carr; Marje Prank; Joana Soares; Julius Vira; Rostislav Kouznetsov; Jukka-Pekka Jalkanen; James J Corbett
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.