Karen Alexander1, Monika Pogorzelska-Maziarz2, Angela Gerolamo2, Nadia Hassen2, Erin L Kelly3, Kristin L Rising4. 1. Jefferson College of Nursing, Thomas Jefferson University, 901 Walnut St., Suite 800, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA. Karen.Alexander@jefferson.edu. 2. Jefferson College of Nursing, Thomas Jefferson University, 901 Walnut St., Suite 800, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA. 3. Department of Family and Community Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, 1015 Walnut Street, Suite 40, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA. 4. Department of Emergency Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, 1020 Sansom Street, Suite 239, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
Abstract
RESEARCH OBJECTIVE: The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted healthcare delivery worldwide with likely negative effects on people who use opioids (PWUO). This scoping review of the original research literature describes the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare delivery for PWUO and identifies gaps in the literature. METHODS: This scoping review of the original research literature maps the available knowledge regarding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare delivery for PWUO. We utilized the methodology developed by the Joanna Briggs Institute for scoping reviews, and content analyses methodology to characterize the current state of the literature. RESULTS: Of the 14 included studies, administrative database (n = 11), cross-sectional (n = 1) or qualitative (n = 2) studies demonstrated service gaps (n = 7), patient/provider experiences (n = 3), and patient outcomes for PWUO (n = 4). In March 2020, healthcare utilization dropped quickly, sharply increasing only for reasons of opioid overdose by May 2020. Service gaps existed in accessing treatment for new patients during the pandemic due to capacity and infrastructure limits. Physicians reported difficulty referring patients to begin an outpatient opioid treatment program due to increased restrictions in capacity and infrastructure. Patients also reported uncertainty about accessing outpatient treatment, but that telehealth initiation of buprenorphine increased access to treatment from home. Disproportionate increases in overdose rates among African Americans were reported in two studies, with differences by race and gender not examined in most studies. Fatal overdoses increased 60% in African Americans during the pandemic, while fatal overdoses in Non-Hispanic White individuals decreased. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, this beginning evidence demonstrates that despite early reluctance to use the healthcare system, opioid overdose-related use of healthcare increased throughout the pandemic. Service delivery for medications to treat OUD remained at or above pre-pandemic levels, indicating the ability of telehealth to meet demand. Yet, racial disparities that existed pre-pandemic for PWUO are intensifying, and targeted intervention for high-risk groups is warranted to prevent further mortality. As the pandemic progresses, future research must focus on identifying and supporting subgroups of PWUO who are at heightened risk for experiencing negative outcomes and lack of access to care.
RESEARCH OBJECTIVE: The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted healthcare delivery worldwide with likely negative effects on people who use opioids (PWUO). This scoping review of the original research literature describes the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare delivery for PWUO and identifies gaps in the literature. METHODS: This scoping review of the original research literature maps the available knowledge regarding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare delivery for PWUO. We utilized the methodology developed by the Joanna Briggs Institute for scoping reviews, and content analyses methodology to characterize the current state of the literature. RESULTS: Of the 14 included studies, administrative database (n = 11), cross-sectional (n = 1) or qualitative (n = 2) studies demonstrated service gaps (n = 7), patient/provider experiences (n = 3), and patient outcomes for PWUO (n = 4). In March 2020, healthcare utilization dropped quickly, sharply increasing only for reasons of opioid overdose by May 2020. Service gaps existed in accessing treatment for new patients during the pandemic due to capacity and infrastructure limits. Physicians reported difficulty referring patients to begin an outpatient opioid treatment program due to increased restrictions in capacity and infrastructure. Patients also reported uncertainty about accessing outpatient treatment, but that telehealth initiation of buprenorphine increased access to treatment from home. Disproportionate increases in overdose rates among African Americans were reported in two studies, with differences by race and gender not examined in most studies. Fatal overdoses increased 60% in African Americans during the pandemic, while fatal overdoses in Non-Hispanic White individuals decreased. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, this beginning evidence demonstrates that despite early reluctance to use the healthcare system, opioid overdose-related use of healthcare increased throughout the pandemic. Service delivery for medications to treat OUD remained at or above pre-pandemic levels, indicating the ability of telehealth to meet demand. Yet, racial disparities that existed pre-pandemic for PWUO are intensifying, and targeted intervention for high-risk groups is warranted to prevent further mortality. As the pandemic progresses, future research must focus on identifying and supporting subgroups of PWUO who are at heightened risk for experiencing negative outcomes and lack of access to care.
Authors: Yih-Ing Hser; Andrew J Saxon; David Huang; Al Hasson; Christie Thomas; Maureen Hillhouse; Petra Jacobs; Cheryl Teruya; Paul McLaughlin; Katharina Wiest; Allan Cohen; Walter Ling Journal: Addiction Date: 2013-10-09 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Gopal K Singh; Isaac E Kim; Mehrete Girmay; Chrisp Perry; Gem P Daus; Ivy P Vedamuthu; Andrew A De Los Reyes; Christine T Ramey; Elijah K Martin; Michelle Allender Journal: Int J MCH AIDS Date: 2019-08-08
Authors: Joshua A Barocas; Alexandra Savinkina; Sara Lodi; Rachel L Epstein; Tara C Bouton; Heather Sperring; Heather E Hsu; Karen R Jacobson; Elissa M Schechter-Perkins; Benjamin P Linas; Laura F White Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2022-08-24 Impact factor: 20.999
Authors: Anh Truc Vo; Thomas Patton; Amy Peacock; Sarah Larney; Annick Borquez Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-07-21 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Kara M Moran; Pricila H Mullachery; Stephen Lankenau; Usama Bilal Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-07-29 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Erin L Kelly; Megan K Reed; Kathryn M Schoenauer; Kelsey Smith; Kristina Scalia-Jackson; Sequoia Kay Hill; Erica Li; Lara Weinstein Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-08-08 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Cilia Mejia-Lancheros; Samira Alfayumi-Zeadna; James Lachaud; Patricia O'Campo; Evie Gogosis; George Da Silva; Vicky Stergiopoulos; Stephen W Hwang; Naomi Thulien Journal: Health Soc Care Community Date: 2022-05-06
Authors: Rachel L Miller; Angela McLaughlin; Vincent Montoya; Junine Toy; Sarah Stone; John Harding; Richard H Liang; Jason Wong; Rolando Barrios; Julio S G Montaner; Jeffrey B Joy Journal: Lancet Reg Health Am Date: 2022-09-23