Literature DB >> 34372809

Real-time prediction of intradialytic relative blood volume: a proof-of-concept for integrated cloud computing infrastructure.

Sheetal Chaudhuri1,2, Hao Han3, Caitlin Monaghan3, John Larkin3, Peter Waguespack4, Brian Shulman4, Zuwen Kuang4, Srikanth Bellamkonda4, Jane Brzozowski3, Jeffrey Hymes4, Mike Black4, Peter Kotanko5,6, Jeroen P Kooman7, Franklin W Maddux3, Len Usvyat3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Inadequate refilling from extravascular compartments during hemodialysis can lead to intradialytic symptoms, such as hypotension, nausea, vomiting, and cramping/myalgia. Relative blood volume (RBV) plays an important role in adapting the ultrafiltration rate which in turn has a positive effect on intradialytic symptoms. It has been clinically challenging to identify changes RBV in real time to proactively intervene and reduce potential negative consequences of volume depletion. Leveraging advanced technologies to process large volumes of dialysis and machine data in real time and developing prediction models using machine learning (ML) is critical in identifying these signals.
METHOD: We conducted a proof-of-concept analysis to retrospectively assess near real-time dialysis treatment data from in-center patients in six clinics using Optical Sensing Device (OSD), during December 2018 to August 2019. The goal of this analysis was to use real-time OSD data to predict if a patient's relative blood volume (RBV) decreases at a rate of at least - 6.5 % per hour within the next 15 min during a dialysis treatment, based on 10-second windows of data in the previous 15 min. A dashboard application was constructed to demonstrate how reporting structures may be developed to alert clinicians in real time of at-risk cases. Data was derived from three sources: (1) OSDs, (2) hemodialysis machines, and (3) patient electronic health records.
RESULTS: Treatment data from 616 in-center dialysis patients in the six clinics was curated into a big data store and fed into a Machine Learning (ML) model developed and deployed within the cloud. The threshold for classifying observations as positive or negative was set at 0.08. Precision for the model at this threshold was 0.33 and recall was 0.94. The area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) for the ML model was 0.89 using test data.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings from our proof-of concept analysis demonstrate the design of a cloud-based framework that can be used for making real-time predictions of events during dialysis treatments. Making real-time predictions has the potential to assist clinicians at the point of care during hemodialysis.
© 2021. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  End Stage Kidney Disease; Machine Learning; Real-Time Prediction

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34372809      PMCID: PMC8351092          DOI: 10.1186/s12882-021-02481-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Nephrol        ISSN: 1471-2369            Impact factor:   2.388


  29 in total

1.  Dialysis hypotension: a hemodynamic analysis.

Authors:  J T Daugirdas
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 10.612

2.  A new device to monitor blood volume in hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Izumi Yoshida; Katsunobu Ando; Yasuhiro Ando; Susumu Ookawara; Masayuki Suzuki; Hiroaki Furuya; Osamu Iimura; Daisuke Takada; Masaharu Kajiya; Takanori Komada; Honami Mori; Kaoru Tabei
Journal:  Ther Apher Dial       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.762

3.  Methods and challenges for the practical application of Crit-Line™ monitor utilization in patients on hemodialysis.

Authors:  Paul Balter; Mikhail Artemyev; Paul Zabetakis
Journal:  Blood Purif       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 2.614

4.  Assessment of dry weight by monitoring changes in blood volume during hemodialysis using Crit-Line.

Authors:  Hector J Rodriguez; Regina Domenici; Anne Diroll; Irina Goykhman
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 10.612

Review 5.  Intradialytic hypotension.

Authors:  Ambreen Gul; Dana Miskulin; Antonia Harford; Philip Zager
Journal:  Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 6.  Intensive Hemodialysis and Treatment Complications and Tolerability.

Authors:  Jose A Morfin; Richard J Fluck; Eric D Weinhandl; Sheru Kansal; Peter A McCullough; Paul Komenda
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 8.860

7.  Reducing symptoms during hemodialysis by continuously monitoring the hematocrit.

Authors:  R R Steuer; J K Leypoldt; A K Cheung; H O Senekjian; J M Conis
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 8.860

8.  Blood volume regulation during hemodialysis.

Authors:  A Santoro; E Mancini; F Paolini; G Cavicchioli; A Bosetto; P Zucchelli
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 8.860

Review 9.  Effects of hemodialysis on cardiac function.

Authors:  Christopher W McIntyre
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 10.612

10.  Effects of Crit-Line® monitor use on patient outcomes and epoetin alfa dosing following onset of hemodialysis: a propensity score-matched study.

Authors:  Scott P Sibbel; Linda H Ficociello; Michael Black; Mayuri Thakuria; Claudy Mullon; Jose Diaz-Buxo; Thomas J Alfieri
Journal:  Blood Purif       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 2.614

View more
  1 in total

1.  High Ultrafiltration Rates and Mortality in Hemodialysis Patients: Current Evidence and Future Steps.

Authors:  Katherine Scovner Ravi
Journal:  Kidney360       Date:  2022-08-25
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.