Literature DB >> 34369391

Trends in Early Graft Failure Leading to Regrafting After Endothelial Keratoplasty in the United States.

Michael J Fliotsos1, Jack A Campbell1, Ximin Li2, Marie B Engstrom3, Christopher G Stoeger3, Cathy McClory4, Michael S Titus4, Patrick Johnson5, Kara B Johnston6, Tim Fischer6, Lisa K Brooks6, Monty M Montoya7, David B Glasser1, Esen Karamursel Akpek1, Divya Srikumaran1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to report trends in the prevalence of early graft failure after endothelial keratoplasty in the United States.
METHODS: Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) and Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) graft volumes were collected from records maintained by 6 major eye banks in the United States from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2018. The prevalence and presumed cause of early graft failures (defined as a graft with persistent edema or regrafted within 8 weeks after keratoplasty) each year were sourced from surgeon-reported adverse events. Failed graft cases from the 3 eye banks were compared with nonfailures at the donor and recipient levels to perform subset analysis of factors associated with early graft failure.
RESULTS: A total of 51,887 endothelial keratoplasty tissues were distributed during the study period; 72% were DSAEK grafts. The total number of early graft failures reported was 168 of 14,284 (1.18%) for DMEK and 322 of 37,603 (0.86%) for DSAEK. Early DMEK failures decreased from 2013 (7.69%) to 2018 (0.68%). In generalized linear mixed model analyses adjusting for donor tissue characteristics, recipient age, and diagnosis, an association of borderline significance was found between higher donor age and early failure [odds ratio (95% confidence interval): 1.03 (1.00-1.05); unit change of 1 yr] and DSAEK [odds ratio 1.02 (1.00-1.04); unit of change 1 yr] cases.
CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of early graft failures in DMEK decreased over time and was comparable with failure rates in DSAEK at the end of the study period. The surgical learning curve might have played a role.
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34369391      PMCID: PMC8818059          DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000002831

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cornea        ISSN: 0277-3740            Impact factor:   3.152


  18 in total

1.  Real-World Outcomes of DMEK: A Prospective Dutch registry study.

Authors:  Suryan L Dunker; Manon H J Veldman; Bjorn Winkens; Frank J H M van den Biggelaar; Rudy M M A Nuijts; Pieter Jan Kruit; Mor M Dickman
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 5.258

2.  Graft rejection following descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: features, risk factors, and outcomes.

Authors:  Elaine I Wu; David C Ritterband; Guopei Yu; Rebecca A Shields; John A Seedor
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  Changing Practice Patterns and Long-term Outcomes of Endothelial Versus Penetrating Keratoplasty: A Prospective Dutch Registry Study.

Authors:  Mor M Dickman; Jean Marie P W U Peeters; Frank J H M van den Biggelaar; Ton A W Ambergen; Martin C J M van Dongen; Pieter Jan Kruit; Rudy M M A Nuijts
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  Donor, Recipient, and Operative Factors Associated with Graft Success in the Cornea Preservation Time Study.

Authors:  Mark A Terry; Anthony J Aldave; Loretta B Szczotka-Flynn; Wendi Liang; Allison R Ayala; Maureen G Maguire; Christopher Croasdale; Yassine J Daoud; Steven P Dunn; Caroline K Hoover; Marian S Macsai; Thomas F Mauger; Sudeep Pramanik; George O D Rosenwasser; Jennifer Rose-Nussbaumer; R Doyle Stulting; Alan Sugar; Elmer Y Tu; David D Verdier; Sonia H Yoo; Jonathan H Lass
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 5.  Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty: Safety and Outcomes: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.

Authors:  Sophie X Deng; W Barry Lee; Kristin M Hammersmith; Anthony N Kuo; Jennifer Y Li; Joanne F Shen; Mitchell P Weikert; Roni M Shtein
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Learning Curve for Graft Preparation in an Eye Bank Using 645 Donor Corneas.

Authors:  Mohit Parekh; Alessandro Ruzza; Vito Romano; Elisa Favaro; Mattia Baruzzo; Gianni Salvalaio; Andrea Grassetto; Stefano Ferrari; Diego Ponzin
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.651

7.  Learning Curve in Descemet's Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty: First Series of 135 Consecutive Cases.

Authors:  Isabel Dapena; Lisanne Ham; Konstantinos Droutsas; Korine van Dijk; Kyros Moutsouris; Gerrit R J Melles
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Risk Factors for Repeat Keratoplasty after Endothelial Keratoplasty in the Medicare Population.

Authors:  Sidra Zafar; Peiqi Wang; Facia A Woreta; Kanza Aziz; Martin Makary; Divya Srikumaran
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 5.258

9.  Cost-Benefit and Cost-Utility Analysis of Amphotericin B Supplementation of Corneal Storage Media With Endothelial Keratoplasty-Prepared Tissue.

Authors:  Trent Tsun-Kang Chiang; Roni M Shtein; Kristen McCoy; Susan Hurlbert; Gregory H Grossman
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 2.651

10.  Primary corneal graft failure. A national reporting system. Medical Advisory Board of the Eye Bank Association of America.

Authors:  K R Wilhelmus; R D Stulting; J Sugar; M M Khan
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1995-12
View more
  1 in total

1.  Clinical outcome of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) with imported donor corneas in eyes of Asian patients; endothelium-in versus endothelium-out method.

Authors:  Young-Ho Jung; Chang Ho Yoon; Mee Kum Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 3.752

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.