Literature DB >> 34368792

Base Editors: Expanding the Types of DNA Damage Products Harnessed for Genome Editing.

Sifeng Gu1, Zsolt Bodai1, Quinn T Cowan1, Alexis C Komor1.   

Abstract

Base editors are an innovative addition to the genome editing toolbox that introduced a new genome editing strategy to the field. Instead of using double-stranded DNA breaks, base editors use nucleobase modification chemistry to efficiently and precisely incorporate single nucleotide variants (SNVs) into the genome of living cells. Two classes of DNA base editors currently exist: deoxycytidine deamination-derived editors (CBEs, which facilitate C•G to T•A mutations) and deoxyadenosine deamination-derived base editors (ABEs, which facilitate A•T to G•C mutations). More recently, the development of mitochondrial base editors allowed the introduction of C•G to T•A mutations into mitochondrial DNA as well. Base editors show great potential as therapeutic agents and research tools, and extensive studies have been carried out to improve upon the original base editor constructs to aid researchers in a variety of disciplines. Despite their widespread use, there are few publications that focus on elucidating the biological pathways involved during the processing of base editor intermediates. Because base editors introduce unique types of DNA damage products (a U•G mismatch with a DNA backbone nick for CBEs, and an I•T mismatch with a DNA backbone nick for ABEs) to facilitate genome editing, a deep understanding of the DNA damage repair pathways that facilitate or impede base editing represents an important aspect for the further expansion and improvement of the technologies. Here, we first review canonical deoxyuridine, deoxyinosine, and single-stranded break repair. Then, we discuss how interactions among these different repair processes can lead to different base editing outcomes. Through this review, we hope to promote thoughtful discussions on the DNA repair mechanisms of base editing, as well as help researchers in the improvement of the current base editors and the development of new base editors.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34368792      PMCID: PMC8341163          DOI: 10.1016/j.ggedit.2021.100005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gene Genome Ed        ISSN: 2666-3880


  4 in total

Review 1.  Reprogramming Microbial CO2-Metabolizing Chassis With CRISPR-Cas Systems.

Authors:  Hai-Yan Yu; Shu-Guang Wang; Peng-Fei Xia
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-06-23

Review 2.  Tips, Tricks, and Potential Pitfalls of CRISPR Genome Editing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Jacob S Antony; John M Hinz; John J Wyrick
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-05-30

Review 3.  CRISPR-based genome editing through the lens of DNA repair.

Authors:  Tarun S Nambiar; Lou Baudrier; Pierre Billon; Alberto Ciccia
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 17.970

4.  Prime editing efficiency and fidelity are enhanced in the absence of mismatch repair.

Authors:  J Ferreira da Silva; G P Oliveira; E A Arasa-Verge; C Kagiou; A Moretton; G Timelthaler; J Jiricny; J I Loizou
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 17.694

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.