| Literature DB >> 34367936 |
Devang P Gupta1, Shalu Gupta1, Chaitry K Shah1, S R Sreevidya1.
Abstract
The aim of this study is to evaluate the prevalence, pathogenesis and management of mucormycosis in post covid 19 patients in our tertiary care covid dedicated hospital. A prospective cross sectional study was done in 70 patients who were admitted in the covid department of BJ Medical College, Civil hospital Ahmedabad and presented with mucormycosis during admission or after discharge over a period of 10 months from March 2020 to December 2020. Middle aged to elderly population were found to be most commonly affected with mucormycosis. It was found that majority of the affected population was uncontrolled diabeteic and had a delayed presentation to hospital due to ongoing covid pandemic crisis. Covid infection had major effect on the hormonal balance of the body as evident from the uncontrolled blood glucose levels of affected patients. In patients with mucormycosis, early detection, surgical debridement, suitable antifungal therapy, and control of risk factors like diabetes mellitus are the main parameters of successful management of this lethal infection. Early diagnosis and treatment of mucormycosis can be life saving as it is a rapidly progressing disease and have been proven fatal. © Association of Otolaryngologists of India 2021.Entities:
Keywords: Amphoterecin B; COVID 19; Debridement; Diabetes mellitus; Fungal; Immunocompromised; Modified denker; Mucormycosis; Open maxillectomy; Palatal erosion
Year: 2021 PMID: 34367936 PMCID: PMC8335711 DOI: 10.1007/s12070-021-02784-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ISSN: 2231-3796
Fig. 1Showing pre op picture of patient with left eye ptosis and complete opthalmoplegia Patient consent- written informed consent for patient information and image to be published was provided by the patient
Fig. 2Showing preoperative MRI gadolinium enhanced image of above patient
Showing age wise distribution of patients
| Age group(Years) | Number of patients | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 10–20 | 0 | 0 |
| 21–30 | 1 | 1.5 |
| 31–40 | 7 | 10 |
| 41–50 | 17 | 24.2 |
| 51–60 | 21 | 30 |
| 61–70 | 20 | 28.5 |
| 71–80 | 4 | 5.8 |
Showing distribution of patients according to HbA1c level
| Hb1Ac (%) | Number of patients | Percentage of patients (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 6–6.5 | 6 | 8.5 |
| 6.5–7 | 17 | 24.2 |
| 7–7.5 | 14 | 20 |
| >7.5 | 33 | 47.2 |
Showing distribution of patients in different treatment groups
| Treatment | No. of patients | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Sino nasal debridement only | 41 | 58 |
| Sino nasal debridement with orbital exenteration/ palatal resection | 23 | 33 |
| Injection amphoterecin B only | 6 | 8 |
Fig. 3Showing endoscopic picture of modified denker approach keeping incison on pyriform aperture
Fig. 4Showing endoscopic picture of exposed posterolateral wall of maxilla and other opened sinuses
Fig. 5Showing open approach of maxillectomy by weber ferguson incision
Fig. 6Showing closure of palatal defect by temporalis muscle flap
Fig. 7Showing image of resected specimen of maxilla
Fig. 8Showing sex distribution of patients
Showing distribution of patients according to RBS values
| Random blood sugar levels (mg/dl) | Number of patients | Percentage of patients (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 150–200 | 11 | 15.7 |
| 201–250 | 12 | 17.1 |
| 251–300 | 9 | 12.8 |
| 301–350 | 19 | 27.1 |
| 351–400 | 10 | 14.2 |
| >400 | 9 | 12.8 |
Showing distribution of immunosuppressive factors among patients
| Immunosuppressive factors | Number of patients | Percentage of patients (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Diabetes | ||
| Under control | 23 | 33 |
| Uncontrolled | 47 | 67 |
| Post renal transplant | 5 | 7 |
| Acute myeloid leukemia | 2 | 3 |
Showing distribution of presenting symptoms among patients
| Symptoms | Number of patients | Percentage of patients (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Periorbital swelling | 37 | 53 |
| Facial swelling | 32 | 46 |
| Loss of vision | 27 | 38 |
| Palatal ulcer | 11 | 16 |
| Drooping of eyelid | 13 | 19 |
| Nasal blockage | 5 | 7 |
| Diplopia | 3 | 4 |
Showing distribution of patients according to CORADS grading in HRCT thorax
| CORADS score | Number of patients | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|
| CORADS 1 | 0 | 0 |
| CORADS 2 | 13 | 19 |
| CORADS 3 | 22 | 31 |
| CORADS 4 | 16 | 23 |
| CORADS 5 | 16 | 23 |
| CORADS 6 | 3 | 4 |