Frédéric Muhla1,2, Karine Duclos3,4, Fabien Clanché3,4, Philippe Meyer5, Séverine Maïaux5, Sophie Colnat-Coulbois4, Gérome C Gauchard3,4. 1. UFR STAPS, Faculty of Sport Science, Université de Lorraine, Villers-lès- Nancy, France, fredericmuhla@outlook.com. 2. EA 3450 DevAH, Development, Adaptation and Handicap, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Lorraine, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France, fredericmuhla@outlook.com. 3. UFR STAPS, Faculty of Sport Science, Université de Lorraine, Villers-lès- Nancy, France. 4. EA 3450 DevAH, Development, Adaptation and Handicap, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Lorraine, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France. 5. Office d'Hygiène Sociale de Lorraine Centre Florentin, Nancy, France.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Falling among the elderly is a major public health issue, especially with the advancing age of the baby boomers. The fall risk assessment tests for many lack a context that would bring them closer to everyday life. Thus, immersive virtual reality, which makes it possible to simulate everyday situations, could make it possible to strengthen the quality of the assessment of the risk of falls. However, it is necessary to understand how the use of a virtual reality device influences the motor control of elderly participants. If vestibular physiotherapists use VR to virtualize their tools, what impact would a visual simulation of movement have on motor control in a locomotor task, if this simulation were plausible? METHODS: Sixty-two elders (70.8 ± 6.7 years old) completed a Timed Up and Go task under 3 conditions: real, virtual reality, and virtual reality with visual and sound movement information. The virtual reality task takes place in a train either stationary at a station or in uniform linear motion. The time and number of steps were recorded using video, and comparisons between conditions were made using Friedman's test. RESULTS: The results show a significant increase in the time and number of steps in "virtual reality" condition compared to the "real" condition. They do not show significant differences between the 2 virtual conditions. CONCLUSION: The use of a running virtual train to provide plausible movement is particularly distinguished from vestibular physiotherapy applications with first a fixed visual support partially obscuring the optical flow. This visual aid coupled with the attention dedicated to the task inhibits the effect of the moving environment on locomotion. However, the visual optical flow will potentially have an effect in people with fear of falling. Virtual reality shows great potential for the simulation of realistic environments for the assessment of the risk of falls and opens up avenues for the development of tests.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Falling among the elderly is a major public health issue, especially with the advancing age of the baby boomers. The fall risk assessment tests for many lack a context that would bring them closer to everyday life. Thus, immersive virtual reality, which makes it possible to simulate everyday situations, could make it possible to strengthen the quality of the assessment of the risk of falls. However, it is necessary to understand how the use of a virtual reality device influences the motor control of elderly participants. If vestibular physiotherapists use VR to virtualize their tools, what impact would a visual simulation of movement have on motor control in a locomotor task, if this simulation were plausible? METHODS: Sixty-two elders (70.8 ± 6.7 years old) completed a Timed Up and Go task under 3 conditions: real, virtual reality, and virtual reality with visual and sound movement information. The virtual reality task takes place in a train either stationary at a station or in uniform linear motion. The time and number of steps were recorded using video, and comparisons between conditions were made using Friedman's test. RESULTS: The results show a significant increase in the time and number of steps in "virtual reality" condition compared to the "real" condition. They do not show significant differences between the 2 virtual conditions. CONCLUSION: The use of a running virtual train to provide plausible movement is particularly distinguished from vestibular physiotherapy applications with first a fixed visual support partially obscuring the optical flow. This visual aid coupled with the attention dedicated to the task inhibits the effect of the moving environment on locomotion. However, the visual optical flow will potentially have an effect in people with fear of falling. Virtual reality shows great potential for the simulation of realistic environments for the assessment of the risk of falls and opens up avenues for the development of tests.