Literature DB >> 3436413

What do women use when they stop using the pill?

W F Pratt1, C A Bachrach.   

Abstract

Current use of oral contraceptives among currently married women aged 15-44 declined from 25 percent to 13 percent between 1973 and 1982, while ever-use increased from 60 percent to 80 percent. By 1982, the pill appeared to be used mainly to delay first pregnancies, secondarily to space subsequent conceptions, and only rarely as a means of ending childbearing. Most women who had stopped using the pill by 1982 had done so on their own initiative: Only about one-third had been advised by a doctor to discontinue use. Virtually all former users gave some physical problem connected with pill use as a reason for quitting the method. At the time they quit, former users had been taking the pill for an average of 3.2 years. The decline in current use of the pill during the 1970s coincided with a marked increase in contraceptive sterilization, but was not the result of a direct switching from the pill to sterilization by individual women. Only 21 percent of women who quit the pill chose sterilization as their next method. The majority--60 percent--switched to nonpermanent methods, the condom being the most popular in all age-groups; the proportions selecting the condom as their next method ranged from 20 percent of 15-19-year-olds to 12 percent of 30-44-year-olds. Nineteen percent of former pill users did not adopt any method after discontinuing the pill.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Americas; Contraception; Contraception Failure; Contraceptive History; Contraceptive Methods; Contraceptive Methods Chosen; Contraceptive Usage; Demographic Factors; Developed Countries; Developing Countries; Family Planning; Female Sterilization; Follow-up Studies; Iud; North America; Northern America; Oral Contraceptives; Population; Population Dynamics; Research Methodology; Research Report; Sterilization Seekers; Sterilization, Sexual; Studies; Time Factors; United States

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3436413

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect        ISSN: 0014-7354


  7 in total

1.  Pharmacy claims data versus patient self-report to measure contraceptive method continuation.

Authors:  Jourdan E Triebwasser; Stephanie Higgins; Gina M Secura; Qiuhong Zhao; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 3.375

Review 2.  Gestodene. A review of its pharmacology, efficacy and tolerability in combined contraceptive preparations.

Authors:  M I Wilde; J A Balfour
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Influence of depressed mood and psychological stress symptoms on perceived oral contraceptive side effects and discontinuation in young minority women.

Authors:  Kelli Stidham Hall; Katharine O'Connell White; Vaughn I Rickert; Nancy Reame; Carolyn Westhoff
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 3.375

4.  The route of estrogen replacement therapy confers divergent effects on substrate oxidation and body composition in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  A J O'Sullivan; L J Crampton; J Freund; K K Ho
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 14.808

5.  Examining the use of oral contraceptives in the management of acne.

Authors:  Heather L Salvaggio; Andrea L Zaenglein
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2010-08-09

Review 6.  Ethynilestradiol 20 mcg plus Levonorgestrel 100 mcg: Clinical Pharmacology.

Authors:  Stefano Lello; Andrea Cavani
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2014-11-16       Impact factor: 3.257

7.  Effect of the ethinylestradiol/norelgestromin contraceptive patch on body composition. Results of bioelectrical impedance analysis in a population of Italian women.

Authors:  Antonio Piccoli; PierGiorgio Crosignani; Carmine Nappi; Salvatore Ronsini; Vincenzina Bruni; Silvia Marelli
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2008-08-26       Impact factor: 3.271

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.