Literature DB >> 14668655

Health care providers' attitudes and beliefs towards common low back pain: factor structure and psychometric properties of the HC-PAIRS.

Ruud M A Houben1, Johan W S Vlaeyen, Madelon Peters, Raymond W J G Ostelo, Pieter M J C Wolters, Suzanne G M Stomp-van den Berg.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The factor structure, reliability and validity of the Health Care Providers' Pain and Impairment Relationship Scale (HC-PAIRS) were determined in the current study. Furthermore, the ability of the HC-PAIRS to serve as a predictor for work and activity recommendations of paramedical health care providers was examined.
DESIGN: For the current study, 156 therapists from several paramedical disciplines (mostly physiotherapy, manual therapy, chiropractic, and McKenzie) completed the HC-PAIRS and questionnaires measuring the perceived harmfulness of physical activities. Furthermore, the therapists gave recommendations for work and physical activity for patients described in vignettes. Since a factor structure was already known for the HC-PAIRS a confirmatory factor analysis was carried out. Reliability of the HC-PAIRS was determined by computing Cronbach's alpha. Validity was examined by reviewing associations between scores on the HC-PAIRS and scores on measures of the harmfulness of physical activities and recommendations for work and physical activity. Regression analyses were carried out to determine whether scores on the HC-PAIRS were a predictor of recommendations for work and physical activity while controlling for other variables.
RESULTS: In contrast to previous research, factor analysis revealed only 1 factor and suggested that 2 items should be removed from the HC-PAIRS. This factor had a Cronbach's alpha of 0.84. The HC-PAIRS showed adequate validity. All associations between scores on the HC-PAIRS and scores on measures of the harmfulness of physical activities and recommendations for work and physical activity were in the expected directions and ranged between 0.25 and 0.62 (P < 0.01). Scores on the HC-PAIRS were the only significant predictor of recommendations for work and physical activity when controlling for possible confounders including gender, years of experience in the treatment of back pain, judgments of severity of symptoms, and judgments of severity of pathology.
CONCLUSION: The HC-PAIRS appears to be a reliable and valid measure of health care providers' attitudes and beliefs about the relationship between pain and impairment. The role of health care providers' attitudes in the treatment of low back pain is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14668655     DOI: 10.1097/00002508-200401000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin J Pain        ISSN: 0749-8047            Impact factor:   3.442


  21 in total

1.  Understanding Physiotherapists' Intention to Counsel Clients with Chronic Pain on Exercise: A Focus on Psychosocial Factors.

Authors:  Jocelyn E Blouin; Miranda A Cary; Mackenzie G Marchant; Nancy C Gyurcsik; Danielle R Brittain; Jenelle Zapski
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 1.037

2.  Do clinicians working within the same context make consistent return-to-work recommendations?

Authors:  Yoko Ikezawa; Michele C Battié; Jeremy Beach; Douglas Gross
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2010-09

3.  Psychometric properties and factor structure of the Spanish version of the HC-PAIRS questionnaire.

Authors:  Julio Domenech; Eva Segura-Ortí; Juan Francisco Lisón; Begoña Espejo-Tort; Daniel Sánchez-Zuriaga
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Attitudes and beliefs on low back pain in physical therapy education: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Marijke Leysen; Jo Nijs; Paul Van Wilgen; Christophe Demoulin; Wim Dankaerts; Lieven Danneels; Lennard Voogt; Albère Köke; Laurent Pitance; Nathalie Roussel
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Pragmatic Implementation of a Stratified Primary Care Model for Low Back Pain Management in Outpatient Physical Therapy Settings: Two-Phase, Sequential Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Jason M Beneciuk; Steven Z George
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2015-04-09

Review 6.  The fear-avoidance model of musculoskeletal pain: current state of scientific evidence.

Authors:  Maaike Leeuw; Mariëlle E J B Goossens; Steven J Linton; Geert Crombez; Katja Boersma; Johan W S Vlaeyen
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2006-12-20

7.  Brief psychologically informed physiotherapy training is associated with changes in physiotherapists' attitudes and beliefs towards working with people with chronic pain.

Authors:  Clair M Jacobs; Beth J Guildford; Warren Travers; Megan Davies; Lance M McCracken
Journal:  Br J Pain       Date:  2015-09-23

8.  Standardized "malhotra-wig vignettes" for research in India : a review with full text.

Authors:  H K Malhotra; N N Wig
Journal:  Indian J Psychiatry       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.759

9.  An abbreviated therapeutic neuroscience education session improves pain knowledge in first-year physical therapy students but does not change attitudes or beliefs.

Authors:  Terry Cox; Adriaan Louw; Emilio J Puentedura
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2016-02-10

Review 10.  [Health care professionals' attitudes and beliefs towards older back pain patients. Analysis of the assessment methods and research gaps].

Authors:  M Laekeman; C Leonhardt
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.107

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.