Felipe Zapata1, Martina Nucci1, Obis Castaño1, Marco Marazzi1,2, Luis Manuel Frutos1,2. 1. Departamento de Química Analítica, Química Física e Ingeniería Química, Universidad de Alcalá, Ctra. Madrid-Barcelona, Km 33.600, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid E28805, Spain. 2. Instituto de Investigación Química "Andrés M. del Rio" (IQAR), Universidad de Alcalá, Ctra. Madrid-Barcelona, Km 33.600, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid E-28805, Spain.
Abstract
Molecular dynamics simulations provide fundamental knowledge on the reaction mechanism of a given simulated molecular process. Nevertheless, other methodologies based on the "static" exploration of potential energy surfaces are usually employed to firmly provide the reaction coordinate directly related to the reaction mechanism, as is the case in intrinsic reaction coordinates for thermally activated reactions. Photoinduced processes in molecular systems can also be studied with these two strategies, as is the case in the triplet energy transfer process. Triplet energy transfer is a fundamental photophysical process in photochemistry and photobiology, being for instance involved in photodynamic therapy, when generating the highly reactive singlet oxygen species. Here, we study the triplet energy transfer process between porphyrin, a prototypical energy transfer donor, and different biologically relevant acceptors, including molecular oxygen, carotenoids, and rhodopsin. The results obtained by means of nanosecond time-scale molecular dynamics simulations are compared to the "static" determination of the reaction coordinate for such a thermal process, leading to the distortions determining an effective energy transfer. This knowledge was finally applied to propose porphyrin derivatives for producing the required structural modifications in order to tune their singlet-triplet energy gap, thus introducing a mechanochemical description of the mechanism.
Molecular dynamics simulations provide fundamental knowledge on the reaction mechanism of a given simulated molecular process. Nevertheless, other methodologies based on the "static" exploration of potential energy surfaces are usually employed to firmly provide the reaction coordinate directly related to the reaction mechanism, as is the case in intrinsic reaction coordinates for thermally activated reactions. Photoinduced processes in molecular systems can also be studied with these two strategies, as is the case in the triplet energy transfer process. Triplet energy transfer is a fundamental photophysical process in photochemistry and photobiology, being for instance involved in photodynamic therapy, when generating the highly reactive singlet oxygen species. Here, we study the triplet energy transfer process between porphyrin, a prototypical energy transfer donor, and different biologically relevant acceptors, including molecular oxygen, carotenoids, and rhodopsin. The results obtained by means of nanosecond time-scale molecular dynamics simulations are compared to the "static" determination of the reaction coordinate for such a thermal process, leading to the distortions determining an effective energy transfer. This knowledge was finally applied to propose porphyrin derivatives for producing the required structural modifications in order to tune their singlet-triplet energy gap, thus introducing a mechanochemical description of the mechanism.
Molecular dynamics is a fundamental tool for shedding light on
many processes ranging from biological to chemical systems. In spite
of ignoring quantum effects, classical dynamics within the Born–Oppenheimer
approximation provides faithful results for many systems and conditions.[1,2] The reliability of the result of the classical dynamics depends
on the accuracy of the potential for describing interactions among
the particles of the system;[3,4] therefore, the use of
accurate potential energy surfaces (PES) is of central importance,
providing molecular forces, which describe accurately the interactions
in the molecular systems in an affordable computational time. There
have been different approaches for determining forces in molecular
dynamics: (i) classical force fields describing conformational changes,[5−7] (ii) reactive force fields mainly devoted to the optimization of
material properties,[8] (iii) ab initio “on
the fly” dynamics (i.e., calculating molecular forces at each
trajectory step),[9,10] and (iv) approximated PES through
the interpolation or fitting of energies calculated for a set of structures
at a high level of theory, adjusted to minimize the error, as the
reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS),[11] neural networks,[12] interpolating moving
least squares,[13] modified Shepard interpolation,[14] and gradient-enhanced kriging (GEK).[15] All such strategies have positive sides and
drawbacks, depending on the size of the system to be studied, the
required simulation time, and the quality of the predictions.[1,16,17]An alternative to these methodologies, which has been followed
in this work, is the construction of analytical PES. It is possible
to construct these analytical functions by spanning the PES as an
extrapolation from some key configurations like the Frank–Condon
(FC) structure and, if present, other nonglobal minima. The advantages
of this methodology are the fast evaluation of the molecular forces
for every structure along the dynamics, hence making it possible to
reach large simulation times without losing accuracy in the force
prediction as long as the expansion is correct in the configuration
space covered by the dynamics simulation. Moreover, this approximation
can be also applied to force fields for electronic excited states,
paving the way to the description of any photophysical phenomenon.
The simplest way to construct the analytical PES from local approximations
is to use a second-order energy derivative expansion for all the electronic
states under study. This kind of simple approach can be extremely
useful when the molecular system presents a well-defined global minimum
in the electronic state populated by the molecule (e.g., S0) and the other states of interest are well represented by up to
a second-order approach (e.g., S1, if our aim is to simulate
the S0 → S1 absorption spectrum).In this study we will focus on the triplet energy transfer (TET)
process involving a triplet donor (3D) and a singlet (1A) or triplet (3A) acceptor that when reaches a
close contact can fulfill the energy transfer criteria. The contact
between both molecules permits interchanging their total spin momentum
by an electron-exchange mechanism (i.e., Dexter-type energy transfer),
making the electronic spin multiplicity of the whole system (D and
A) conserved and making the process spin-allowed.[18,19] As it has been discussed elsewhere, the TET rate constant depends
mainly on three factors: the diffusion rate constant of A and D in
the solvent, the efficient overlap of the wavefunctions of both molecules,
and the singlet-triplet (S0-T1) energy gap in
both donor (ETD) and acceptor
(ETA) molecules.[20−24] Nevertheless TET can also take place as an intramolecular process
where the contact between donor and acceptor moieties of the molecule
is mediated by linkers.[25,26]The maximum TET efficiency is reached when the resonance condition
is fulfilled, i.e., when ETD = ETA. As the difference
between the two gaps, defined as ΔET = ETA – ETD, becomes positive (i.e., the donor S0-T1 energy gap is lower than the corresponding
acceptor gap, ETD < ETA), the rate constant of the process
decays exponentially within 3–4 kcal/mol.[23] In the case of exothermic reactions, i.e., ETD > ETA, the rate constant of the energy transfer in the condensed phase
matches the rate constant of the D-A encounter probability, and there
is no experimental evidence of decreasing quenching efficiency as
the reactions becomes even more exothermic.[27]The modulation of the donor S0-T1 energy
gap (ETD) is therefore an ambitious
and highly relevant target, since it can be chosen in order to optimize
the TET efficiency of any specific mechanism. As we have previously
demonstrated,[28] the modulation of ETD can be determined as a function
of the activation energy (i.e., the thermal energy necessary to achieve
a given variation of the T1 energy referred to as the T1 minimum structure), providing a reaction coordinate for the
process (see Figure ).
Figure 1
Energy diagram showing how the donor T1 activation energy
(EaD) can modify the donor
T1-S0 energy difference (ETD), thus modifying the energy criterion to meet
the resonance condition with the acceptor.
Energy diagram showing how the donor T1 activation energy
(EaD) can modify the donor
T1-S0 energy difference (ETD), thus modifying the energy criterion to meet
the resonance condition with the acceptor.Here, we choose porphyrin as a triplet donor while taking into
account different relevant acceptors: molecular oxygen, a series of
carotenoids (lutein, zeaxanthin, β-carotene, and lycopene),
and the retinal visual pigment.Especially, the TET between triplet porphyrin (a paradigmatic photosensitizer)[29] and triplet molecular oxygen 3O2 (X3Σ–g) to
generate singlet oxygen is a model system for the study of photodynamic
therapy (PDT) treatments:[30] After light
absorption promotes the spin-allowed population of the singlet excited
state manifold of the photosensitizer (S, usually with n > 1), followed by a fast vibrational
decay to S1 and intersystem crossing to populate the triplet
manifold, finally assuring that most of the incoming photon energy
populates T1, from where TET can take place (Figure a).
Figure 2
(a) Scheme showing the photophysics underlying photosensitizer
light absorption: the singlet excited manifold is directly populated
by a vertical transition followed by internal conversion (IC) and
intersystem crossing (ISC) to the triplet manifold. Finally, the lowest
triplet state (T1) can be populated, from where a TET process
can be activated between the photosensitizer, i.e., the donor (D),
and an acceptor (A); in the case shown, the singlet-triplet energy
gap of D and A indicate the resonance condition (ETD = ETA). (b) Structure of the donor considered in this study (porphyrin),
including the internal coordinates that were found to be more involved
in modulating the TET efficiency. These internal coordinates are shown
on two pyrrole rings. By symmetry, the same internal coordinates do
apply for the specular two pyrrole rings.
(a) Scheme showing the photophysics underlying photosensitizer
light absorption: the singlet excited manifold is directly populated
by a vertical transition followed by internal conversion (IC) and
intersystem crossing (ISC) to the triplet manifold. Finally, the lowest
triplet state (T1) can be populated, from where a TET process
can be activated between the photosensitizer, i.e., the donor (D),
and an acceptor (A); in the case shown, the singlet-triplet energy
gap of D and A indicate the resonance condition (ETD = ETA). (b) Structure of the donor considered in this study (porphyrin),
including the internal coordinates that were found to be more involved
in modulating the TET efficiency. These internal coordinates are shown
on two pyrrole rings. By symmetry, the same internal coordinates do
apply for the specular two pyrrole rings.We should note that other acceptors were also found to be good
triplet acceptors (e.g., cyclooctatetraene can accept energy donated
by porphyrin[31]), although less relevant
from the biological point of view.On the other hand, carotenoid polyenes have also attracted attention
as they were suggested to provide photoprotection to photosynthetic
pathways by quenching the chlorophyll (containing a porphyrin derivative
chromophore) triplet state through TET, hence avoiding the eventual
singlet oxygen formation from chlorophyll.[32]The retinal visual pigment was also taken into consideration embedded
in its opsin protein, constituting a Schiff-base possibly acting as
a triplet acceptor for night vision.[33−35] Moreover, retinal–opsin
complexes (especially rhodopsin) constitute also an intriguing case
of endothermic TET process when porphyrin is the triplet donor, while
in all other cases (molecular oxygen and carotenoids) a more common
exothermic TET process is expected.After constructing T1 analytical PES for porphyrin,
we perform molecular dynamics and analyze the TET reaction coordinate,
to understand which normal modes are mainly involved in the modulation
of the singlet-triplet energy gap. This knowledge is finally applied
to the molecular design of porphyrin derivatives, by introducing a
mechanical strain intended to activate the desired normal modes, showing
that a modulation of ETD can
be effectively achieved, especially for exothermic TET processes.
Computational Methods
The minimum energy structures of porphyrin in the lowest singlet
(S0) and triplet (T1) states were determined
by applying density functional theory (DFT) by using, after comparing
different functionals (Table S1), the hybrid
functional B3LYP[36,37] with a CC-pVDZ basis set.First and second derivatives of the energy in Cartesian coordinates
were determined for the optimized structures in both electronic states.
All the calculations were performed with the Gaussian09 software package.[38] The complete molecular dynamics simulations
within the canonical ensemble were performed using our own code, as
we discuss in the following section.[39]The triplet energy reaction coordinate for the donor has been obtained
by using the algorithm, and the definition is described elsewhere[21,28] and briefly explained below, using analytical gradients determined
with the electronic methods described above. More in detail, the triplet
energy reaction coordinate (RC) defines the minimum energy configuration of the donor on its PES
fulfilling a certain resonance condition imposed by the energy of
the acceptor. We should highlight that the method employed allows
us to treat D and A molecules separately; hence, it is not necessary
to study the D···A supermolecule. The positive side
of this approach is that we can avoid studying the details of the
D···A interactions. Nevertheless, the drawback is that
we cannot consider the overlap between A and D wavefunctions, thus
solely relying on the TET resonance energy criterium.Moreover, in flexible donors, it is possible that nonvertical endothermic
energy transfer can play a role, due to a large reduction of ETD induced by geometrical distortions,
which require low activation energy (see Figure ). Hence, a geometrical distortion parameter
(γ) can be defined for each internal
coordinate i as follows:where ΔETD is the difference
between the S0-T1 energy of the distorted donor
and that of the donor in its T1 minimum.For carotenoids, the same level of theory used for porphyrin was
applied. Especially, the carotenoid structures were optimized in S0 followed by single point evaluation of the T1 energy.The T1-S0 energy gap of retinal in rhodopsin
was calculated elsewhere through the CASPT2//CASSCF approach,[33] while the T1-S0 energy
gap of molecular oxygen was calculated here at the CASPT2 level, as
shown in the Supporting Information (Figures S1–S3). All CASPT2 and CASSCF calculations were performed with the OpenMolcas
code.[40]We should note that both retinal and molecular oxygen are treated
at a more sophisticated ab initio approach due to the intrinsic multiconfigurational
nature of their electronic transition. This does not apply to carotenoids
and porphyrin, which were shown to be correctly described by DFT methods.
Moreover, the large size of these molecules and of their relative
active space makes their multiconfigurational treatment unfeasible.Porphyrin phosphorescence and molecular oxygen absorption were
simulated at different temperatures (50 and 300 K), by applying the
Boltzmann distribution, to highlight how temperature affects their
possible superposition and thus the energy transfer probability (Figures S4 and S5).Finally, different mechanochemical strains were induced on porphyrin
with two different strategies: (i) by including a series of linkers
connected to opposite pyrrole rings (−O(CH2)O–, with n = 5, 7, and
9) and optimizing their geometry and (ii) performing a relaxed scan
along the distance connecting the two carbon atoms where the linkers
are anchored (steps of 0.1 Å).In all cases, all molecules were studied in vacuum. To justify
the choice of the B3LYP functional, additional functionals were tested
(see the Supporting Information). All calculations
related to mechanochemistry were performed at the B3LYP/CC-pVDZ level
of theory, in order to be comparable with the unsubstituted porphyrin.
Methodology Development
TET involves two different states of a donor–acceptor complex,
the state before the energy transfer [*D···A] and after
the transfer [D···*A], where the asterisk denotes the
excitation. It has been proposed elsewhere that the TET process can
be separated in terms of single transitions *D → D and A →
*A in the very weak coupling limit,[21] as
usually occurs in solution. Following this approach, in order determine
the excitation transfer rate it is necessary to know the energy of
each electronic transition and study whether the resonance condition
(i.e., same electronic transition energy for both molecules) can be
fulfilled. Even if the energy of the vertical transitions for *D →
D and A → *A does not match, the resonance condition can be
reached by thermal activation. Implying that energy resonance is fulfilled
following a minimum energy coordinate (so called the TET coordinate),
the activation energy for a given pair of donor–acceptor can
be determined.[21] On the other hand, for
the study of the TET from a dynamical description of the system, it
is in principle necessary to use accurate force fields for both D
and A in the ground and excited states. Nevertheless, here, we focus
the attention on the dynamic description of *D → D, while relying
on static calculations for obtaining the A → *A energies.
Construction of Analytical PES in Internal Coordinates
In order to construct the PES of porphyrin in a given electronic
state we have performed a quadratic expansion of the potential energy
function in terms of internal coordinates:where is a vector in internal coordinates denoting any configuration
(i.e., molecular structure), and is also a vector in internal coordinates corresponding to
the reference configuration for the expansion, in this case corresponding
to the Franck–Condon structure. ( and are the energy gradient vector and Hessian matrix of the (n) electronic state evaluated for the geometry, both expressed in internal coordinates.
From the approximate PES given in (eq ), the energy gradient vector obtained isThe election of internal
instead of Cartesian coordinates for deriving the force field has
some advantages, since the curvilinear coordinate system, if correctly
chosen, preserves the quadratic approximation more accurately, making
the spanned PES more precise as the displacement vector (0) increases.[41]It is therefore necessary to select a set of internal coordinates
for the expansion of PES by following a certain chemical knowledge,
in order to accurately predict the energy of the extrapolated points.
Since, usually, first and second derivatives are available in Cartesian
coordinates, it is necessary to transform the Cartesian derivatives
into internal derivatives. The relation between the derivatives of
the energy with respect to internal and Cartesian coordinates is described
by the Wilson matrix whose elements are given by the derivatives of the internal
coordinates with respect to the Cartesian coordinates.[42] Using this matrix, the relation between the
gradients in Cartesian and internal coordinates are given by:andwhere ( is the energy gradient
vector in Cartesian coordinates evaluated for an arbitrary configuration, expressed in Cartesian coordinates.
Since the matrix is not squared, its
inversion requires to find the generalized inverse of a matrix given by = where is a unitary matrix. In the
case of using a set of redundant internal coordinates, the inversion
of the matrix requires a previous
diagonalization followed by the elimination of the zero eigenvalues
resulting from the redundant internal coordinates, keeping only those
eigenvectors corresponding with the 3N-6 degrees of vibrational freedom.[43] The relation between the Hessian matrices in
both set of coordinates is obtained after differentiating (eq ) and (eq ):andwhere ( is the Hessian matrix in
Cartesian coordinates evaluated for the configuration, and is a three-dimensional array whose elements are the second derivatives of the i internal coordinate with respect to the jth and kth Cartesian coordinates.In order to obtain the numerical values of the gradient and Hessian
matrix in internal coordinates, analytical expressions were developed
and implemented for the first and second derivatives of the internal
coordinates, with respect to Cartesian coordinates (i.e., B and B terms).
Molecular Dynamics
In order to simulate the molecular
system at constant temperature (i.e., an NVT canonical ensemble),
the Nosé–Hoover chain of thermostats and the equations
resulting from the extended-Lagrangian method were applied, thus generating
non-Hamiltonian dynamics.[44] The equations
of motion were integrated using a time-reversible integrator, using
the Liouville approach through the Trotter factorization.[45] As it has been shown, a chain of thermostats
can drive the variables of the harmonic oscillator to a canonical
distribution,[46] and since the potential
developed in this work is given by a collection of harmonic oscillators,
the Nosé–Hoover chain of thermostats was considered
an appropriate selection.The initial conditions for simulating
the canonical ensemble are prepared by obtaining random velocities
of the Maxwell–Boltzmann distribution, assuming that every
component of the velocity of each atom can be considered as an independent
Gaussian random variable.[5] In order to
avoid misinterpretation and numerical drifting in the temperature,
the motion and rotation of the center of mass is removed at every
step of integration in both ensembles.The dynamic simulations were carried out in the gas phase at 300,
200, 100, and 50 K. The simulation time was 1.0 ns using an integration
step of 0.1 fs.The conservation of the total energy was checked by the variance
in the temperature, given by the following equation:where N is
the number of atoms.[3,47]The full code can be accessed at the following repository: https://github.com/resmol/dynamics
Results and Discussion
Dynamics of the Triplet Porphyrin Sensitization of Triplet Oxygen
Using the methodology described above, we have studied the dynamic
behavior of porphyrin in the triplet (T1) state and the
evolution of the T1-S0 energy gap along the
simulation.Dynamics simulation provides, among other information,
the probability distribution for the configuration space, allowing
us to identify the frequency (or probability density) of a given range
of coordinate values in a given electronic state for certain conditions
(temperature, etc.). Different electronic properties depending on
the configuration of the system can be determined and expressed in
terms of probability density. This is the case of the energy gap between
two electronic states. For the study of TET, it is necessary to measure
the T1-S0 energy gap of porphyrin along the
trajectory, obtaining from a large simulation time a distribution
function of the T1-S0 energy gap. This distribution
can be directly related to the T1 → S0 emission (phosphorescence) spectrum of porphyrin. For the T1 minimum energy structure, the energy of the T1-S0 transition is 31 kcal·mol–1. This value corresponds to a T1 activation energy equal
to zero (see Figure ). At the same time, the T1-S0 energy gap of
the selected acceptors spans a wide energy window, from ca. 23 kcal·mol–1 for triplet molecular oxygen to ca. 38 kcal·mol–1 for retinal as the chromophore of bovine rhodopsin.
All carotenoids lie in between, with a S0-T1 energy gap of ca. 27 kcal·mol–1 for lycopene
and β-carotene and around 28 kcal·mol–1 for zeaxanthin and lutein. It has to be reminded that while molecular
oxygen is a T1 species in the ground state, all other studied
acceptors are S0 ground-state species (Figure a).
Figure 3
T1-S0 energy gap, ETD, as a function of the activation energy on T1, EaD, (black), obtained
from the determination of the TET reaction coordinate for triplet
porphyrin (T1 → S0 transition). Out-of-plane
distortions are active below 24 kcal·mol–1,
while in-plane distortions play the key role above 24 kcal·mol–1. All acceptor S0-T1 gaps are
also indicated with a colored line, displaying the corresponding structure
at the bottom.
T1-S0 energy gap, ETD, as a function of the activation energy on T1, EaD, (black), obtained
from the determination of the TET reaction coordinate for triplet
porphyrin (T1 → S0 transition). Out-of-plane
distortions are active below 24 kcal·mol–1,
while in-plane distortions play the key role above 24 kcal·mol–1. All acceptor S0-T1 gaps are
also indicated with a colored line, displaying the corresponding structure
at the bottom.From a chemical point of view, there is not an easy way to predict
how every porphyrin internal coordinate can stabilize or destabilize
both T1 and S0 states in order to modulate the
TET process. In the following study, we show how dynamics simulations
at constant temperature provide realistic geometries that, coupled
to the determination of the TET reaction coordinate, identify the
molecular distortions having a greater statistical weight in the TET
process.Therefore, the geometrical distortion parameters γ, describing the TET reaction coordinate,[28] was calculated for every geometry obtained in
each integration step along the trajectories. Figure b shows the internal coordinates that have
the greatest influence in the TET process between porphyrin and any
donor, for constant temperature simulation at 300 K. Correspondingly, Table reports the values
of γ for the set of internal coordinates
shown in Figure b
in the range of T1-S0 energy gaps of 23–38
kcal/mol. According to these values, the out-of-plane torsions are
the most feasible geometrical distortions at room temperature, due
to the associated lower force constants (higher amplitude of the vibrational
modes) compared to changes in bonds or angle values. Nevertheless,
for the same reason, small changes of bonds or angles could account
for significant changes in the T1 energy, hence resulting
in a significant modulation of the TET process.
Table 1
Values of the Geometrical Distortion
Parameters (γ) for the Most Relevant
Internal Coordinates of Porphyrin (See Nomenclature in Figure b)
coordinate
γi (kcal/mol)
coordinate
γi (kcal/mol)
R1
2.8
Θ3
10.9
R2
2.0
Θ4
10.6
R3
1.6
Θ5
3.6
R4
3.5
Θ6
5.3
R5
1.9
Ψ1
0.8
Θ1
4.2
Ψ2
2.0
Θ2
5.3
Ψ3
1.0
TET Reaction Coordinate for the Porphyrin/Acceptor System
Singlet oxygen generation by triplet porphyrin takes place according
to:All other acceptors studied here do
imply a singlet-to-triplet spin change:In any case, all involved transitions 3O2 → 1O2, 1A → 3A and 3Por → 1 Por are spin-forbidden.
Nevertheless, as it has been discussed above, the whole process involving
both electronic transitions (i.e., D and A taken as a “supermolecule”)
are spin-allowed.[43] On the other hand,
both transitions must fulfill the energy resonance condition, which
ensures the balance between the transferred and the accepted energy.
The triplet energy of the 3Por → 1Por
transition defined as vertical excitation from the 3Por
relaxed structure (i.e., the T1 minimum corresponding to
the phosphorescence maximum) is 31 kcal·mol–1, while the 3O2 → 1O2 transition is, following the same definition, ca. 23 kcal·mol–1,[48] implying that some
changes must take place on both molecules in order to reach the resonance
condition.[28] The same situation applies
for the carotenoid structures studied here (27–28 kcal·mol–1), although resulting in a less exothermic TET process.
If we take into consideration the retinal chromophore embedded in
the opsin cavity to form rhodopsin, the singlet-triplet energy gap
is even larger than porphyrin (38 kcal·mol–1), making a less-probable endothermic TET necessary.In the case of weak coupling limits, since the absolute value of
the electronic coupling term is very low compared with other energies
involved in the transfer step, the PES of the complex Por···A
can be separated in two uncoupled PES for the donor and acceptor partners,[21] and therefore, the role of the internal coordinates
of each molecule in reaching the energy resonance can be analyzed
independently. If the resonance condition is assumed to take place
with minimum activation energy, the TET reaction coordinate can be
determined as described elsewhere.[28] In Figure , the variation of
the 3Por → 1Por transition energy is
displayed as a function of the activation energy.On the other hand, all singlet-triplet transitions of the various
acceptors are indicated as corresponding to their ground-state minima
structures. Hence, the intersection between the curve representing
the 3Por → 1Por energy gap variation
(Figure , black) and
the line representing the singlet-triplet energy gap of a certain
acceptor corresponds to the fulfillment of the resonance condition.
This means that we are focusing at finding the minimum energy distortion
of porphyrin that would maximize the TET process for a given acceptor.
For instance, the energy resonance condition for both D and A transitions
(ETD = ETA) is fulfilled for a porphyrin structure where
stretching modes and especially out-of-plane distortions contribute
significantly in lowering the S0-T1 energy gap
to equal the S0-T1 gap of molecular oxygen.
In addition, 3O2 has a very reduced capacity
in modulating its S0-T1 energy gap because of
the single stretching mode of the molecule. To demonstrate this assumption,
we have calculated the same curve (S0-T1 energy
gap as a function of the activation energy) for 3O2, showing the much narrower capabilities to modulate the S0-T1 gap (see the Supporting Information).In any case, porphyrin shows a significant ability to modulate
the 3Por → 1Por energy gap by thermal
fluctuations following the softer modes. In fact, in order to decrease
the energy gap, the optimal molecular distortions correspond to in-plane
distortions (i.e., stretching modes) for the initial 7 kcal·mol–1 (i.e., from 31 to 24 kcal·mol–1), while further reduction of this gap is efficiently reached by
out-of-plane distortions (sheet-bend-like distortion, see Figure ), which provides
the optimal distortion in order to reach the ca. 23 kcal·mol–1 necessary to achieve resonance with the oxygen S0-T1 gap (3Σg → 1Δg transition). In principle, the larger
the out-of-plane distortion (i.e., the more pronounced the sheet-bending),
the lower S0-T1 can be reached, fulfilling,
if required, highly exothermic TET processes. Such distortion does
not modify the nature of the T1 state, as evidenced by
energy and spin density considerations (see Figures S7 and S8).
Figure 5
Porphyrin population density obtained from 1 ns molecular dynamics
simulations at different temperatures (50, 100, 200, and 300 K) represented
as a function of both S0-T1 energy difference
and T1 activation energy (density populations are given
in a logarithmic scale).
This result could be partially envisioned by looking at the internal
coordinates more involved in modulating the TET efficiency (Figure b): stretching modes
across pyrrole rings (R1-to-R5) and a couple
of torsion modes (Θ1,2) on two facing pyrrole rings,
responsible for the sheet bending. Indeed, the TET reaction coordinate
shown in Figure is
composed of the most efficient coordinates in controlling the TET
process.Concerning the other proposed acceptors, all of them fall into
the in-plane distortion region. Especially, the carotenoids are the
least energy-demanding compounds (3–5 kcal·mol–1) still corresponding to a more probable exothermic TET process.
This explains well why carotenoids (in their different flavors) were
particularly selected by nature to accept the triplet energy from
chlorophyll (a porphyrin derivative) in photosynthetic systems, thus
preventing damages to this fundamental natural process.On the other hand, a less feasible endothermic TET process (7 kcal·mol–1) is required to photosensitize the retinal pigment
and allow vision under dim-light (i.e., infrared) conditions, as experienced
by some deep-sea fishes in the presence of chlorophyll[49−53] and by some patients treated with photodynamic therapy drugs based
on porphyrin derivatives.[35] Although less
probable, we show that activation of in-plane stretching modes can
make possible the fulfillment of the resonance condition also in this
case.
Estimated Experimental TET Rate Constants
The experimental
TET rate constants between a donor and an acceptor in a given solvent
can be estimated based on the mechanism involving diffusive and energy
transfer steps.[20]where k and k– are the diffusion constants, and k and k– are the forward and
backward energy transfer processes. Taking into account that backward
energy transfer is negligible in the case of the endothermic energy
transfer process (i.e., the triplet energy of the donor is larger
than the triplet energy of the acceptor, hence k ≫ k–), the rate experimental constant can be approximated to:where the k–/k0 ratio can only be estimated (k–/k0 ∼ 0.25) and the activation
energy (Ea) can be fitted to a quadratic
function:where kcal/mol units are
used for energy. Here, the denominator is equal to , which corresponds to the geometrical distortion
parameter[20] measuring the nonvertical behavior
of the donor/acceptor (for comparison, the strongly nonvertical acceptor
cyclooctatetraene has a value of 13.5 ).[20]The
experimental energy transfer rate constant is therefore:Taking into account that the diffusion constant is in the range
(depending on the specific experimental conditions) 1010 to 1011 s–1, the estimated experimental
energy transfer rate constant (kexpen) is:The representation of logkexpen as a function of the T1-S0 energy gap (i.e., ETA) for porphyrin is given in Figure .
Figure 4
Estimated experimental energy transfer rate constants as a function
of the triplet energy of the acceptor molecule, i.e., porphyrin at
a temperature of 298 K. The dots indicate the approximate rate constants
for the different studied acceptors, when considering only forward
energy transfer, i.e., exothermic conditions (color code taken from Figure , with the white
dot indicating the porphyrin T1 minimum structure).
Estimated experimental energy transfer rate constants as a function
of the triplet energy of the acceptor molecule, i.e., porphyrin at
a temperature of 298 K. The dots indicate the approximate rate constants
for the different studied acceptors, when considering only forward
energy transfer, i.e., exothermic conditions (color code taken from Figure , with the white
dot indicating the porphyrin T1 minimum structure).
Comparison of the TET Reaction Coordinate and Dynamics Simulations
Molecular dynamics of the triplet state porphyrin provides useful
information for understanding the feasibility of the TET reaction
coordinate. By analyzing the 106 points obtained from the
different constant temperature simulations (T = 50,
100, 200, and 300 K), the population density can be obtained as a
function of the variation of both the S0-T1 energy
gap and T1 activation energy (see Figure ). As expected, porphyrin tends to explore regions with larger
variations of the S0-T1 energy gap as the thermal
energy increases, hence allowing the system to reach higher activation
energies. This means that, although not selectively, the resonance
condition for the TET process to any acceptor can be thermally induced.
Indeed, the density distribution is always located within the region
defined by the “static” definition of the TET reaction
coordinate. As a matter of fact, it would be possible to define essentially
the same TET reaction coordinate from molecular dynamics results by
simply taking the lowest activation energy structure for any given
interval of the S0-T1 energy gap.Porphyrin population density obtained from 1 ns molecular dynamics
simulations at different temperatures (50, 100, 200, and 300 K) represented
as a function of both S0-T1 energy difference
and T1 activation energy (density populations are given
in a logarithmic scale).Moreover, from the molecular dynamics results, it is also possible
to estimate the fraction of porphyrin molecules that, along the simulation
time, reaches the resonance condition to donate energy to a given
acceptor. This fraction, which is a function of the selected temperature,
can be computed as the overlap between the density populations of
the singlet-triplet transitions for both porphyrin and the acceptor.
By computing such a population overlap, it is found that the TET rate
constant increases exponentially with temperature, as it is predicted
by assuming a Boltzmann distribution of the initial states of the
donor and acceptor and using the transition state theory.[20]Alternatively, the TET rate constant can be obtained through the
Fermi golden rule,[54] by integrating the
spectral overlap between the normalized spectra related to donor and
acceptor singlet-triplet transitions. Such normalized spectra can
be extracted from the distribution functions of the S0-T1 energy gap, available by treating the dynamics data.Here, we take into consideration the overlap between porphyrin
phosphorescence and triplet oxygen absorption, showing the thermal
activation of this photosensitization process: at 50 K there is no
overlap, while at 300 K a non-negligible, although small, overlap
does appear (see Figures S4 and S5), indicating
that there is room for improvement in terms of photosensitization
efficiency. Nevertheless, most of the biological and biomedical applications
related to TET processes are not applicable for temperatures higher
than 300 K; hence, porphyrin could be chemically modified in order
to match the desired TET resonance condition.
Induced Mechanochemical Strain
As we have shown that,
in principle, thermal energy could be used to selectively activate
a certain T1-S0 energy gap, we have adopted
a chemical substitution strategy in order to propose modified porphyrins
matching the expected distortions (see Figure ). We note that this approach was very recently
applied to modify the triplet energy of cyclooctatetraene as the acceptor.[55] Especially, we do expect that out-of-plane distortions
should lower the T1-S0 energy difference, compared
to in-plane distortions, due to differently applied forces induced
by a chosen substitution pattern (i.e., mechanochemistry). Especially,
we have picked dioxy-alkyl chains of different length to connect two
facing pyrrole units, thus reproducing the expected out-of-plane distortion
(see Figure b). Dioxy-alkyl
chains were selected since they do not modify the “original”
porphyrin chromophore, and, at the same time, they can be successfully
anchored to organic chromophores, as it was previously found by some
of the authors in both theoretical and experimental points of view,
leading to highly distorted structures of stilbene[56] and pyrene.[57]
Figure 6
In-plane (a) and out-of-plane (b) distortions induced on porphyrin
through suggested substitution patterns. The optimized geometries
and the relative T1-S0 energy difference (in
kcal/mol) are shown. The most affected molecular coordinates are shown
by dashed lines and arrows.
In-plane (a) and out-of-plane (b) distortions induced on porphyrin
through suggested substitution patterns. The optimized geometries
and the relative T1-S0 energy difference (in
kcal/mol) are shown. The most affected molecular coordinates are shown
by dashed lines and arrows.The results (Figure b) show that lowering the length of the linker chain, by decreasing
the number of methylene groups from nine to five, corresponds to a
higher porphyrin distortion and thus to a progressive lowering of
the T1-S0 energy difference, as expected. This
trend was also confirmed by performing a relaxed scan along the same
anchoring distance (see Figure S6 for details),
although we are aware that, from a synthetic point of view, the most
distorted structures could be hardly synthesized.On the other hand, in-plane distortions are more difficult to be
implemented, due to the fact that the position and the type of substituent
can easily induce out-of-plane distortions as well. Nevertheless,
we have found a possible substitution pattern by introducing symmetrically
eight methyl groups, two on each pyrrole ring. In this way, an in-plane
force is generated due to steric strain between the two −CH3 groups on each pyrrole ring, slightly modifying the overall
conjugation pattern, and resulting in an increase in the T1-S0 energy difference compared to both out-of-plane distorted
structures and unsubstituted porphyrin (Figure a).
Conclusions
A methodology was developed and implemented for building analytical
PES as functions of the first and second derivatives of energy with
respect to the internal coordinates. This methodology was used to
build the relevant PES (T1 and S0) involved
in the energy transfer processes of a prototypical donor: porphyrin.
These analytical PES were used for molecular dynamics simulation at
constant temperature (from 50 to 300 K) for the simulation, within
the weak coupling limit, of the TET process between triplet porphyrin
and different acceptors: molecular oxygen, various types of carotenoids,
and rhodopsin. The obtained results indicate that the out-of-plane
sheet-bending-like motion and in-plane stretching are the coordinates
enabling the process. These structural deformations allow the modulation
of the porphyrin T1-S0 energy gap, reaching
the resonance condition for exothermic and endothermic TET processes,
through thermal activation energy. The molecular dynamics simulations
were compared with the static determination of the TET reaction coordinate
(that defines the lowest activation energy structures for a given
T1-S0 energy gap), finding a reliable agreement.
Consequently, the TET reaction coordinate can be correctly determined
via analysis of molecular dynamics simulations, including the coordinates
responsible for the process.With the aim of finding a more selective way, other than thermal
energy, to modify the porphyrin structure in order to match a defined
T1-S0 energy gap (thus maximizing a specific
porphyrin-acceptor TET process), a substituent approach was proposed:
dioxy-alkyl chains of different lengths were linked to two facing
pyrrole units, thus generating a mechanochemical pushing force resulting
in porphyrin sheet-bending. In this way, on the one hand, the structural
deformation proposed by the TET reaction coordinate to reach highly
exothermic resonance conditions (i.e., molecular oxygen as the acceptor)
was achieved, as evidenced by a reduced T1-S0 energy gap as a function of the linker length. On the other hand,
in-plane distortions were proposed by analysis of the TET reaction
coordinate to reach less pronounced exothermic and even endothermic
resonance conditions (i.e., carotenoids and rhodopsin, respectively).
Although a substituent effect can hardly play a large role in planar
modifications of porphyrin, we show that by simple methyl substitution
on each pyrrole unit, a non-negligible increase in its T1-S0 energy gap can be indeed obtained.Thus, we have firmly established the theoretical basis to design
specific donors (or acceptors) capable of matching a desired singlet-triplet
energy difference, in order to maximize the energy transfer process.
A possible implementation was also proposed based on chemical substitution,
mimicking the activation of the complex coordinates theoretically
described. If applied to porphyrin as the donor, our results could
play a role in the fields of photodynamic therapy and photosynthetic
machineries.
Authors: Sebastian Reineke; Frank Lindner; Gregor Schwartz; Nico Seidler; Karsten Walzer; Björn Lüssem; Karl Leo Journal: Nature Date: 2009-05-14 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Ignacio Fdez Galván; Morgane Vacher; Ali Alavi; Celestino Angeli; Francesco Aquilante; Jochen Autschbach; Jie J Bao; Sergey I Bokarev; Nikolay A Bogdanov; Rebecca K Carlson; Liviu F Chibotaru; Joel Creutzberg; Nike Dattani; Mickaël G Delcey; Sijia S Dong; Andreas Dreuw; Leon Freitag; Luis Manuel Frutos; Laura Gagliardi; Frédéric Gendron; Angelo Giussani; Leticia González; Gilbert Grell; Meiyuan Guo; Chad E Hoyer; Marcus Johansson; Sebastian Keller; Stefan Knecht; Goran Kovačević; Erik Källman; Giovanni Li Manni; Marcus Lundberg; Yingjin Ma; Sebastian Mai; João Pedro Malhado; Per Åke Malmqvist; Philipp Marquetand; Stefanie A Mewes; Jesper Norell; Massimo Olivucci; Markus Oppel; Quan Manh Phung; Kristine Pierloot; Felix Plasser; Markus Reiher; Andrew M Sand; Igor Schapiro; Prachi Sharma; Christopher J Stein; Lasse Kragh Sørensen; Donald G Truhlar; Mihkel Ugandi; Liviu Ungur; Alessio Valentini; Steven Vancoillie; Valera Veryazov; Oskar Weser; Tomasz A Wesołowski; Per-Olof Widmark; Sebastian Wouters; Alexander Zech; J Patrick Zobel; Roland Lindh Journal: J Chem Theory Comput Date: 2019-10-01 Impact factor: 6.006
Authors: Luis Manuel Frutos; Obis Castano; Jose Luis Andres; Manuela Merchan; A Ulises Acuna Journal: J Chem Phys Date: 2004-01-15 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Marco Marazzi; Hugo Gattuso; Angelo Giussani; Hong Zhang; Miriam Navarrete-Miguel; Christophe Chipot; Wensheng Cai; Daniel Roca-Sanjuán; François Dehez; Antonio Monari Journal: J Phys Chem Lett Date: 2019-11-06 Impact factor: 6.475
Authors: Avik K Pati; Ouissam El Bakouri; Steffen Jockusch; Zhou Zhou; Roger B Altman; Gabriel A Fitzgerald; Wesley B Asher; Daniel S Terry; Alessandro Borgia; Michael D Holsey; Jake E Batchelder; Chathura Abeywickrama; Brandt Huddle; Dominic Rufa; Jonathan A Javitch; Henrik Ottosson; Scott C Blanchard Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2020-09-10 Impact factor: 11.205