Comparison of Viscoelastic Substance Injection Versus Air Filling in the Anterior Chamber During Foldable Capsular Vitreous Body (FCVB) Implant Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

INTRODUCTION: To compare the outcomes of viscoelastic substance injection with air filling in the anterior chamber during foldable capsular vitreous body (FCVB) implant surgery in patients with severe retinal disease.
METHODS: Thirty eyes with severe retinal diseases were randomly divided into two groups. In the viscoelastic group, 0.15-0.2 mL of 1.7% sodium hyaluronate was injected into the anterior chamber after FCVB implantation; in the air group, the anterior chamber was maintained by filling the air after FCVB implant surgery. The eyes of treated patients were examined during a 24-week follow-up appointment. Data, including intraocular pressure (IOP), the difference between preoperative and postoperative IOP, and postoperative complications, were recorded.
RESULTS: Data collected from 27 eyes were used in the final analysis. The IOP of the air group was lower than that of the viscoelastic group from the first to third postoperative day (P < 0.01). Moreover, the difference between preoperative and postoperative IOP in the viscoelastic group was significantly smaller than that in the air group from the first to third postoperative day (P < 0.01). After the 1st postoperative week, postoperative IOP values were similar in the two groups (P > 0.05). Postoperative complications in the air group and the viscoelastic group included corneal blood staining (1 eye vs. 0 eyes), transient postoperative diffuse hemorrhage (5 eyes vs. 1 eye), inflammation reaction (9 eyes vs. 4 eyes), and postoperative fibrin exudation (4 eyes vs. 1 eye), respectively.
CONCLUSION: The use of viscoelastic substances in the anterior chamber during FCVB implant surgery was associated with less fluctuation in postoperative IOP and could reduce postoperative complications. REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR-TNC-00000396.

Key Summary Points

Digital Features

This article is published with digital features, including video slides, to facilitate understanding of the article. To view digital features for this article go to https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.14823105.

Introduction

The vitreous body is a transparent gelatinoid structure that occupies four-fifths of the volume in the eye [1]. The vitreous substitute is necessary to tamponade the reattached retina after vitrectomy for severely damaged eyes [2]. Foldable capsular vitreous body (FCVB), which was developed in China, is a novel device used to replace natural vitreous [3-5]. It has excellent mechanical strength, refractivity, and biocompatibility [6]. FCVB can prevent silicon oil displacement and emulsification. Unlike silicon oil and air tamponade, there is no more need for patients to keep prone positions after surgery [7]. In some clinical trials, FCVB was applied to treat severe retinal diseases, showing good stability and efficacy after vitrectomy [6-8]. Moreover, FCVB implant surgeries have been associated with intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction and fewer complications.

After air-fluid exchange, the FCVB is implanted into the vitreous cavity, after which the air, balanced salt solution, or viscoelastic substances are used to maintain the anterior chamber. However, the air harms corneal endothelial cells in a time-dependent manner [9, 10]. Moreover, balanced salt solution has low viscosity and a short residence time in the anterior chamber and will probably be replaced by aqueous humor. Viscoelastic substances are indispensable materials for intraocular surgery [11, 12]. Sodium hyaluronate (Na-HA) is a kind of naturally occurring viscoelastic. It is a high molecular mass polysaccharide present in the extracellular matrix of connective tissues. It is also found in the aqueous humor and the vitreous and coats of the corneal endothelium [13]. Nevertheless, it remains unclear whether Na-HA could effectively maintain IOP and reduce postoperative complications.

The aim of this study was to compare Na-HA injected into the anterior chamber with regularly applied air after FCVB implantation by testing the change in IOP and postoperative complications.

Methods

Trial Design

In this prospective randomized controlled trial, two surgical procedures (air or viscoelastic substance in the anterior chamber after FCVB implantation) were compared in two independent samples (parallel-group design). This trial was performed in the Department of Ophthalmology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University. The study was approved by the institutional review board (IRB), the Human Research Ethics Committee of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University (Registration number ChiCTR-TNC-00000396). Written informed consent was obtained from each patient before enrollment in the trial.

Participants

Thirty eyes requiring FCVB implant to treat severe retinal detachment were enrolled between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2018. Patients were randomly divided into the viscoelastic group or the air group based on a blocked randomization scheme (block size = 30). Participants showed no other ophthalmological or severe systemic diseases. Excluded criteria were patients with serious heart, lung, liver, or kidney dysfunction; serious eye inflammation; only one eye affected; suitably silicone oil-filled eyes; or diseases that made them unsuitable for inclusion. The inclusion and exclusion criteria are outlined in Table 1.

Table 1

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria	Exclusion criteria
Able to attend follow-up	Only one eye
The treated eyes should below PVR-B	Serious eye inflammation
Axial length ≤ 28 mm	Suitably silicone oil-filled eyes
A severe retinal detachment (could not be cured with SO tamponade; rigid retinal re-detachments or inferior holes that occurred after more than 3 months of SO tamponade)	Glaucoma (NVG; traumatic glaucoma; persistent ocular hypertension)
Severe posterior trauma (posterior scleral ruptures with large disruptions of the retina; severe scleral ruptures with retinal detachments and choroidal damage)	Unoperated eye (uveitis; sympathetic ophthalmia)
Predislocated vision: HM, LP, and NLP	Scar physique
	Serious heart, lung, liver, or kidney dysfunction

SO silicone oil, HM hand movements, LP light perception, NLP no light perception, NVG neovascular glaucoma, PVR proliferative vitreoretinopathy

All the patients agreed to be examined eight times after surgery: the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd day, the 1st, 2nd, 4th, 12th, and 24th week after surgery. Additional examinations were performed in the case of reoperations or at any unscheduled visit (e.g., because of concomitant therapy or adverse events).

Surgery

In both groups, standard 23-gauge 3-port pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) was used to remove the vitreous. If eyes were filled with SO, SO was first removed. The peeling of retinopathy proliferative membrane, relaxing peripheral retinotomy, and removal of the subretinal membrane were then performed to reattach severe retinal detachments. After air-fluid exchange, an incision of about 3.5 mm was made on the sclera of the FCVB implantation site at either the 4 or 8 o’clock position, 4 mm away from the corneal limbus (Fig. 1). The FCVB was triple folded and implanted into the vitreous cavity. SO was then injected into the capsule to fill the FCVB (Fig. 1). The valve was fixed on the sclera. In the viscoelastic group, 1.7% Na-HA (Bausch & Lomb Co., Ltd., Shang Dong, China) 0.15-0.2 mL was injected into the anterior chamber (see Video 1); in the air group, the anterior chamber was maintained by air after FCVB implantation (see Video 2). Then conjunctival and sclera incisions were sewed by interrupted sutures in both groups.

Fig. 1

Procedure of foldable capsular vitreous body (FCVB) implantation. A A scleral incision of about 3.5 mm was created by a 20G MVR blade in the superior-temporal quadrant. B The FCVB was triple folded and implanted into the vitreous cavity through the scleral incision. C Silicone oil was injected into the capsule to fill the FCVB through the valve. D The sclera incision was closed by interrupted sutures

Data Collection

All patients were assessed at eight scheduled follow-up visits. The primary outcomes were IOP and the difference between preoperative and postoperative IOP. The IOP was tested by two senior doctors using Goldmann applanation measurement technique with a slit lamp. The average value of the two results was the final IOP value. Secondary outcomes were vitreous hemorrhage, hyphema, and corneal blood staining after surgery. IOP was measured at every visit. The anterior segment was explored and recorded for signs of inflammation and hyphema using a slit lamp. Retinal reattachments were analyzed by B-scans. CT and MRI were used to evaluate retinal reattachments when B-scans failed to provide definite data on retinal reattachments.

Statistical Analysis

A sample size calculation was performed and based on the assumption that the study was only concerned with a change in IOP caused by the operation. A sample size of 13 patients in each group could provide 80% power at a two-sided alpha level of 0.05 to detect a difference of 3.0 mmHg at a standard deviation of 2.5 mmHg.

The data between groups were compared using the Student t test, the Fisher exact test, or the profile analysis with unstructured covariance taking into consideration the correlation of repeated readings from the same individuals. A two-sided P value of less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. SAS 9.2 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) software package was used.

Results

One patient from the air group refused to participate in the study before the beginning of surgery. Two additional patients, one from the air group and one from the viscoelastic group, were lost to follow-up. Three patients were excluded from this study. Finally, 27 eyes were included in the analysis.

Table 2 summarizes the demographic and baseline characteristics of patients in this study. There were no significant differences between the two groups concerning the demographic profile and the baseline characteristics (P > 0.05). Intraoperative data are summarized in Table 3. The procedure lasted 106.8 ± 8.5 min in the air group and 110.5 ± 9.6 min in the viscoelastic group; no significant difference was observed between the two groups (P = 0.2919). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the reattachment rate of severe retinal detachments (P = 1.0000). No leakage of the FCVB was found, and nor was FCVB removed from the eyes.

Table 2

Patients characteristics of the two groups

	Air group (n = 13)	Viscoelastic group (n = 14)	P value
Male, n (%)	10 (76.9)	11 (78.6)	1.0000
Age, mean ± SD	41.8 ± 13.5	42.4 ± 14.2	0.9134
Right eye, n (%)	7 (53.8)	6 (42.9)	0.7064
Aphakic, n (%)	8 (61.5%)	10 (71.4)	0.7445
Phakic, n (%)	4 (30.8)	3 (21.4)	0.8303
Pseudophakic, n (%)	1 (7.7)	1 (7.1)	1.0000
Severe posterior trauma: large disruptions of the retina, n (%)	5 (38.5)	6 (42.9)	1.0000
Severe scleral ruptures: retinal and choroidal detachments, n (%)	3 (23.1)	2 (14.3)	0.6483
Severe PVR: retinal detachments after two or more silicone oil tamponade, n (%)	2 (15.4)	3 (21.4)	1.0000
Severe retinal detachment: failed to respond to silicone oil, n (%)	2 (15.4)	2 (14.3)	1.0000
Severe PVR: failed to respond to heavy silicone oil, n (%)	1 (7.7)	1 (7.1)	1.0000

Data are presented as number (proportion) or mean ± SD

PVR proliferative vitreoretinopathy

Table 3

Intraoperative data of the two groups

	Air group (n = 13)	Viscoelastic group (n = 14)	P value
Length of procedure, min	106.8 ± 8.5	110.54 ± 9.6	0.2919
Vitrectomy, n (%)	11 (84.6)	12 (85.71)	1.0000
Lensectomy, n (%)	4 (30.8)	3 (21.4)	0.6776
IOL removal, n (%)	1 (7.7)	1 (7.1)	1.0000
Scleral buckle, n (%)	0 (0)	0 (0)	–
Cryopexy, n (%)	0 (0)	0 (0)	–
Removal of silicone oil, n (%)	3 (23.1)	3 (21.4)	1.0000
Laser, n (%)	13 (100)	14 (100)	–
Iridectomy at 6 o'clock, n (%)	13 (100)	14 (100)	–
Peripheral 360° retinotomy, n (%)	8 (61.5)	9 (64.3)	1.0000
Radial retinotomy, n (%)	1 (7.7)	1 (7.1)	1.0000

Data are presented as number (proportion) or mean ± SD

There was no significant difference between groups in baseline IOP (Table 4). On the 1st day after the operation, IOP in the viscoelastic group was 14.16 ± 2.40 mmHg, which was significantly higher than that in the air group (8.84 ± 2.38 mmHg) (P < 0.0001). The same phenomenon was observed on the 3rd day after the operation with 13.88 ± 1.62 mmHg in the viscoelastic group versus 11.15 ± 1.51 mmHg in the air group (P = 0.0014). The difference between groups began to narrow and was no longer significant from the 1st week after operation (P > 0.05) (Fig. 2).

Table 4

IOP values and the difference between preoperative and postoperative IOP values at different time points

Time points	Air group (n = 13)		Viscoelastic group (n = 14)		P1 value	P2 value
	IOP value (mmHg)	D value (mmHg)	IOP value (mmHg)	D value (mmHg)
Preoperative baseline	12.90 ± 2.61		12.55 ± 3.20		0.759
Postoperative 1st day	8.84 ± 2.38	4.06 ± 4.02	14.16 ± 2.40	− 1.61 ± 1.53	< 0.0001	0.0002
Postoperative 2nd day	9.89 ± 2.17	3.01 ± 3.55	13.42 ± 2.13	− 0.87 ± 1.45	< 0.0001	0.0022
Postoperative 3rd day	11.15 ± 1.51	1.75 ± 2.92	13.88 ± 1.62	− 1.33 ± 2.39	0.0014	0.0060
Postoperative 1st week	12.32 ± 1.68	0.58 ± 2.06	13.52 ± 0.92	− 0.97 ± 2.57	0.1522	0.0962
Postoperative 2nd week	12.55 ± 1.99	0.35 ± 3.29	13.56 ± 2.53	− 1.01 ± 2.93	0.2299	0.2662
Postoperative 4th week	11.82 ± 1.36	1.08 ± 3.33	11.99 ± 1.80	0.56 ± 2.28	0.8140	0.6328
Postoperative 12th week	11.60 ± 1.19	1.30 ± 1.93	11.89 ± 1.59	0.66 ± 2.48	0.6979	0.4613
Postoperative 24th week	11.02 ± 1.27	1.88 ± 2.17	11.13 ± 1.59	1.42 ± 2.19	0.8807	0.5865

IOP intraocular pressure, D difference of IOP values = IOP value at preoperative baseline − IOP values at the postoperative time point, P for IOP value comparison between groups, P for D value comparison between groups

Fig. 2

Postoperative IOP change in the two groups. *P < 0.01 for comparison between groups

Postoperative IOP in both groups varied at different time points (Table 4). On the 1st day after the operation, postoperative IOP increased by 1.61 ± 1.53 mmHg in the viscoelastic group while it decreased by 4.06 ± 4.02 mmHg in the air group compared with preoperative IOP value (P = 0.0002). Similarly, postoperative IOP increased by 1.33 ± 2.39 mmHg in the viscoelastic group and decreased by 1.75 ± 2.92 mmHg in the air group on the 3rd day after surgery (P = 0.0060). Compared with baseline IOP, postoperative IOP dropped by 1.42 ± 2.19 mmHg in the viscoelastic group (P = 0.0231) and 1.88 ± 2.17 mmHg in the air group (P = 0.0051) at the 24th weeks (Table 4).

Three among 27 eyes (11.1%) showed post-vitrectomy hypotony (Fig. 3). The difference between IOP values at the baseline and the last follow-up was more than 5 mmHg in these 3 eyes. Two of these 3 eyes were from the air group; their IOP changed from 14.8 mmHg and 15.7 mmHg at the baseline to 9.3 mmHg and 10.5 mmHg at the last follow-up. In addition, 1 eye was from the viscoelastic group, and the IOP in this eye decreased from 17.1 to 11.8 mmHg.

Fig. 3

Postoperative complications in two groups of patients. Diffuse hemorrhage: diffuse hemorrhage in the anterior chamber and the vitreous cavity. In the air group, diffuse hemorrhage in the anterior chamber and the vitreous cavity were seen in 5 eyes; in the viscoelastic group, transient postoperative diffuse hemorrhage in the vitreous cavity was absorbed in 1 eye only. The postoperative inflammatory response included inflammatory cells, fibrin, and flare in the anterior chamber, which are displayed in this figure respectively. In the air group, the postoperative inflammatory response was seen in 6 eyes. Among 6 eyes with inflammatory cells in the anterior chamber, 2 eyes were swollen up and 1 eye was with fibrin in the anterior chamber. In the viscoelastic group, inflammatory cells in the anterior chamber were found in only 2 eyes

In the air group, corneal blood staining in the anterior chamber was found in 1 eye (Fig. 4), and postoperative diffuse hemorrhage in the anterior chamber and the vitreous cavity was found in 5 eyes among 13 eyes. In contrast, in the viscoelastic group, there was no corneal blood staining among 14 eyes, and transient postoperative diffuse hemorrhage was observed in vitreous cavity of 1 eye (Fig. 3). The duration of diffuse hemorrhage in the vitreous cavity was brief and lasted approximately 1 week.

Fig. 4

Anterior segment photos and imaging examination of two patients. A In the air group, a male, 47-year-old patient was diagnosed with severe ocular trauma in the posterior segment of the right eye. A1 Anterior segment image was taken before surgery. A2 Orbital CT before surgery (B-scan check was unsuitable for this patient with an operative history of posterior sclera cracking suturing, and MRI checking was also not recommended because of the presence of intraocular metal foreign body). A3 Corneal blood staining after surgery. A4 Orbital MRI after surgery, the retina was supported by FCVB. B In the viscoelastic group, a male, 43-year-old patient was diagnosed with severe ocular trauma in the posterior segment of the right eye. B1 Anterior segment image was taken before surgery. B2 B-scan ultrasonography before surgery. B3 Anterior segment image after surgery. B4 OCT after surgery, the retina was supported by the 60-μm-thick capsular membrane of FCVB

After FCVB implantation, inflammatory responses, including inflammatory cells, flare, and fibrin, were found in the anterior chamber. Anterior chamber inflammation was observed in 4 (28.6%) eyes from the viscoelastic group and 9 (69.2%) eyes from the air group on the 1st postoperative day. Among these 9 eyes with anterior chamber inflammation, fibrin exudation in the anterior chamber was observed in 4 eyes in the air group. However, in the viscoelastic group, fibrin exudation in the anterior chamber was only observed in 1 eye (Fig. 3). The inflammatory response was most severe on the 1st postoperative day; after that, it gradually declined and lasted until the postoperative 7th day.

Discussion

The major findings of this study are (i) injection of Na-HA into the anterior chamber after FCVB implantation could maintain postoperative IOP; (ii) no corneal blood staining and diffuse hemorrhage were observed in the anterior chamber; and (iii) postoperative inflammatory response was reduced in the anterior chamber of eyes injected with Na-HA. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that evaluated the efficacy of viscoelastic substances applied in the anterior chamber after FCVB implantation. Our results indicated that compared with the use of air in the anterior chamber, Na-HA applied after FCVB implantation could maintain stable postoperative IOP and reduce postoperative complications.

There were no significant differences between the two groups in the reattachment rates of severe retinal detachments in this study. Among 27 eyes, 23 (85.2%) eyes ultimately attained and sustained anatomic retinal attachment at the last examination (about 6 months). In Lin et al.’s study, retinal reattachments were analyzed by B-scan in 8 (72.3%) out of the 11 eyes at the end of the 3-month treatment time, which was similar to the rates we encountered during our clinical trial [6].

IOP is one of the essential factors in sustaining the shape of an eye. Previous studies have shown that post-vitrectomy hypotony is a well-recognized postoperative complication in the eyes after severe PVR and severe ocular trauma surgery [14, 15]. In our study, the IOP values on the first to third postoperative days were 8.84-11.15 mmHg (lower than preoperative values) in the air group and 13.42-14.16 mmHg (closer to baseline IOP values) in the viscoelastic group. Hypotony may occur as a result of increased absorption of intraocular fluid through the area of bare retinal pigment epithelium. Scar tissue can cause dysfunction of the ciliary epithelium and/or mechanical detachment of the ciliary body (CB) [16, 17]. Yet, the mechanisms through which FCVB implantation produced transient hypotony are not fully understood. There are some possible explanations for transient hypotony after FCVB implantation. First, the inflammatory response of CB after surgery, resulting from the surgical scleral incision and ciliary body local injury, could contribute to hypotony [18]. It is believed that hypotony in inflammation occurs through a prostaglandin-mediated decrease in aqueous production (aqueous shutdown) combined with an increase in uveoscleral outflow [19]. Second, reoperations are more susceptible to transient hypotony, since significantly more fluid leakage occurs in reoperations than in primary operations [20]. In our study, this was not the primary PPV operation for 11 (40.7%) patients in both groups. It is possible that previous surgery altered the elasticity and regenerative capacity of scleral tissue, thus rendering wounds in this tissue more prone to leakage. Furthermore, vitrectomized eyes will have a complete excision of the vitreous, resulting in less internal vitreous plugging of sclerotomies [21]. Third, the length of the procedure could influence postoperative inflammation and IOP [22, 23]. In our study, the length of the procedure was 106.8 ± 8.5 min in the air group and 110.5 ± 9.6 min in the viscoelastic group. FCVB implantation is an unconventional and complicated operation that might involve other concurrent procedures such as 360° retinotomy, anterior flap retinectomy, radial retinotomy, membrane removal, endo-laser photocoagulation, and cataract surgery. Postoperative intraocular inflammation resulting from the long procedure may promote the development of transient hypotony.

Postoperative chronic hypotony can be defined as the last follow-up IOP of 5 mmHg or even lower compared to the preoperative value. Some previous studies have reported that the percentage of eyes with hypotony after vitrectomy ranges from 6.7% to 31% [24, 25]. In our study, 3 out of 27 eyes (11.1%) showed post-vitrectomy hypotony, which was consistent with previously reported studies. Even though it reached comparable levels, IOP at the 6-month post-implantation time was still lower than the baseline in both groups. The chronic hypotony could be explained by the following: (1) chronic traction of the anterior vitreous base, resulting in shallow detachment of CB, hyposecretion, and subsequent hypotony [25]; (2) mechanical damage of repeated surgery to the ciliary processes; (3) those who underwent 360° retinectomy. Alturki et al. recorded hypotony in 40% of a series of eyes in which a 360° retinectomy was performed [26]. Although the primary aim of retinectomy is to maintain adequate relief of traction and successful retinal reattachment, limiting the retinectomy size to the minimum necessary to relieve traction on the retina may also help avoid hypotony.

In the present study, the difference between preoperative and postoperative IOP in the viscoelastic group was significantly smaller than that in the air group from 1st to 3rd day after surgery. The use of Na-HA in the anterior chamber led to temporarily inadequate production of aqueous fluid to some extent, which improved transient hypotony after FCVB implantation. At the same time, the use of Na-HA interfered with trabecular network channels for aqueous humor outflow, which maintained stable postoperative IOP. Na-HA does not stay in the anterior chamber for a long time because of its relatively rapid elimination from the eyes. Na-HA in the anterior chamber is degraded by the intraocular enzyme hyaluronidase and eliminated through Schlemm’s canal and uveoscleral pathways. As a result, there was no difference in postoperative IOP between groups from the 1st week after surgery onwards.

Lin et al. reported that anterior chamber hemorrhaging after FCVB implantation was observed in 3 out of 11 eyes (27.3%), which was similar to 6 out of 27 eyes (22.2%) in this study [6]. A large implantation incision of FCVB, about 3.5 mm, could be one of the factors causing postoperative anterior chamber hemorrhage and diffuse hemorrhage in the vitreous cavity. Accordingly, second-generation FCVB should be designed smaller to adapt to a small incision. In our study, corneal blood staining and transient postoperative diffuse hemorrhage were found more often in the eyes of the air group compared to the viscoelastic group. This was likely related to postoperative hypotony in the air group. Viscoelastic agents are used in ophthalmology to protect tissue and cells from mechanical trauma and prevent the influx of blood or efflux of fluid/viscoelastic from the anterior chamber.

Inflammatory cells, flare, or fibrin, the obvious characteristics of an inflammatory response, were found in the anterior chamber after FCVB implantation. In our study, fibrin exudation was found in the anterior chamber of 5 eyes, which accounted for 18.5%, and was higher than the incidence of fibrin exudation (15.3% and 16.2% after phacovitrectomy surgery) reported by some researchers [27, 28]. Surgical trauma is a known cause of inflammation [18]. In this study, a large incision was required for FCVB implantation. FCVB implantation is a complicated operation, which combines multiple operative methods and may promote postoperative inflammation. In the present study, postoperative fibrin exudation was found in 4 out of 13 eyes in the air group compared to 1 out of 14 eyes in the viscoelastic group. Arikan et al. reported that the anterior chamber reaction might significantly increase 1 day after operation [29]. Some studies have reported that the viscoelastic 1% solution of sodium hyaluronate injected into the eye of an owl monkey can be eliminated from the anterior chamber within 48-72 h [30]. In this study, Na-HA may prevent inflammatory factors in a posterior segment from entering the anterior chamber and then inhibit fibrin exudation in the anterior chamber during the inflammatory response prone stage.

Experimental and clinical studies have demonstrated corneal endothelial damage after exposure to air. This occurs because the air bubble separates the corneal endothelial layer and the aqueous humor, preventing the exchange of nutrients, or the pressure from the air bubble on the cells or trauma, drying out the exposed surface of the endothelial cells. In our study, Na-HA was injected into the anterior chamber that formed a protective viscoelastic layer coating of the corneal endothelium. However, corneal epithelial edema and band-shaped degeneration of cornea postoperative complications were not observed in the air group, which implied that corneal endothelium cell damage was not serious. We speculated that in the air group, as a result of the FCVB implantation into the vitreous cavity, there was a small amount of air in the anterior chamber, which was soon replaced by the aqueous humor.

This study has a few limitations. First, the sample size was relatively small. Patient enrollment was difficult because of fewer patients receiving FCVB implantation and strict inclusion. However, the sample size in this study has been scientifically calculated, which could provide 80% power at a two-sided alpha level of 0.05 and is the largest one among all studies reported on FCVB implantation operation. In addition, other kinds of viscoelastic substances, such as chondroitin sulfate and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, should also be tested during FCVB operation.

Conclusions

Injection of Na-HA in the anterior chamber after the FCVB implant was associated with less fluctuation in postoperative IOP and could reduce postoperative complications. Clinical ophthalmologists should consider regularly applying viscoelastic substances like NA-HA for FCVB implantation.

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 Video 1. Viscoelastic was injected into the anterior chamber after FCVB implantation (MP4 60561 KB)

Supplementary file2 Video 2. No injection was made into the anterior chamber after FCVB implantation. The anterior chamber was maintained by air in the air group (MP4 64348 KB)

Why carry out this study?

Some complications of foldable capsular vitreous body (FCVB) implant surgeries have been associated with intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction. In this study, we hypothesized that sodium hyaluronate, a kind of naturally occurring viscoelastic, could relieve postoperative IOP reduction when applied after FCVB implantation.

What was learned from the study?

Injection of viscoelastic substance in the anterior chamber during surgery could relieve postoperative IOP reduction. During a 24-week follow-up, a smaller fluctuation of postoperative IOP and fewer complications were found in patients who received viscoelastic treatment in the anterior chamber during surgery. Clinical ophthalmologists should consider regularly applying viscoelastic substances for FCVB implantation.