Literature DB >> 34351430

[Positron emission tomography with computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging for primary staging of prostate cancer].

Ergela Hasa1, Thomas Langbein2, Matthias Eiber2, Karina Knorr2.   

Abstract

CLINICAL/METHODOLOGICAL ISSUE: Prostate cancer is the most common malignancy and the second leading cause of cancer-related death in men. Accurate imaging diagnosis and staging are crucial for patient management and treatment. The role of nuclear medicine in the diagnosis of prostate cancer has evolved rapidly in recent years due to the availability of hybrid imaging with radiopharmaceuticals targeting the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA). STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL PROCEDURES: Hybrid imaging provides higher diagnostic accuracy compared to conventional imaging and has a significant impact on clinical management. Numerous radiotracers have been used in clinical applications, with PSMA ligands being the most commonly used. METHODOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS: Hybrid imaging provides higher diagnostic accuracy for lymph node and bone metastases compared to conventional imaging and has a significant impact on clinical management. PERFORMANCE: The high accuracy for primary staging in high-risk prostate cancer using PSMA ligands has led to the inclusion of PSMA positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) in the new German S3 guideline for primary staging of prostate cancer.
PURPOSE: The aim of this article is to provide an overview of the use of PET imaging in the primary diagnosis of prostate cancer, to present the most commonly used radiotracers, and to highlight the results of recent studies.
© 2021. Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hybrid imaging; Primary staging; Prostate cancer; Prostate-specific membrane antigen; Radioactive tracers

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34351430     DOI: 10.1007/s00117-021-00895-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiologe        ISSN: 0033-832X            Impact factor:   0.635


  41 in total

1.  PET-CT Cancer Imaging.

Authors:  Bryant Furlow
Journal:  Radiol Technol       Date:  2018-11

Review 2.  Prostate cancer PET tracers: essentials for the urologist.

Authors:  Tyler J Fraum; Daniel R Ludwig; Eric H Kim; Paul Schroeder; Thomas A Hope; Joseph E Ippolito
Journal:  Can J Urol       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.344

Review 3.  PET/MRI: Where might it replace PET/CT?

Authors:  Eric C Ehman; Geoffrey B Johnson; Javier E Villanueva-Meyer; Soonmee Cha; Andrew Palmera Leynes; Peder Eric Zufall Larson; Thomas A Hope
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 4.  Comparison of 18F-FDG-PET/CT and 18F-FDG-PET/MR imaging in oncology: a systematic review.

Authors:  Amit Singnurkar; Raymond Poon; Ur Metser
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 2.668

Review 5.  Positron emission tomography in prostate and renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Dana Mathews; Orhan K Oz
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.309

Review 6.  18F-FDG PET/CT and PET/MRI Perform Equally Well in Cancer: Evidence from Studies on More Than 2,300 Patients.

Authors:  Claudio Spick; Ken Herrmann; Johannes Czernin
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Metabolic imaging of untreated prostate cancer by positron emission tomography with 18fluorine-labeled deoxyglucose.

Authors:  P J Effert; R Bares; S Handt; J M Wolff; U Büll; G Jakse
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Metastatic prostate cancer: initial findings of PET with 2-deoxy-2-[F-18]fluoro-D-glucose.

Authors:  P D Shreve; H B Grossman; M D Gross; R L Wahl
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  [Potential of PET/MRI for diagnosis of prostate cancer].

Authors:  M C Röthke; A Afshar-Oromieh; H-P Schlemmer
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 10.  [PET-CT and PET-MRI of the prostate : From 18F-FDG to 68Ga-PSMA].

Authors:  K Knorr; M Eiber; T Maurer; H-J Wester; K Scheidhauer
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 0.635

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.