Literature DB >> 34349424

Expression of stem cell marker cytokeratin 19 in reduced enamel epithelium, dentigerous cyst and unicystic ameloblastoma - A comparative analysis.

C N V Akhila1, G Sreenath1, A Ravi Prakash1, M Rajini Kanth1, A Vikram Simha Reddy1, S Naveen Kumar2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The process of odontogenesis is complex involving epithelial-mesenchymal interactions, along with the molecular signaling pathways triggering the initiating process. The triggering factors and cells precisely involved in the pathogenesis of odontogenic cysts and tumors are unknown. There is a vast array of biomarkers used to stain different sites, thereby helpful in diagnosing and evaluating the prognosis of these cysts and tumors. Cytokeratins are the intermediate filament proteins which maintain cell integrity and alter their properties in cysts and tumors. In the following study, cytokeratin 19 expression patterns are assessed quantitatively in reduced enamel epithelium, dentigerous cyst and unicystic ameloblastoma. AIM: The aim of present study is to assess expression of CK 19, a stem cell marker in reduced enamel epithelium, dentigerous cyst and unicystic ameloblastoma, quantitatively.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present study is carried out with 15 samples in each group. Reduced enamel epithelium is derived from the patients undergoing treatment for impacted teeth. Histopathologically diagnosed cases of dentigerous cyst and unicystic ameloblastoma were considered for the study. With the help of Olympus BX 43 microscope, with ProgRes microscope camera, the 45 slides obtained were examined. The region of interest was selected in each slide and number of cells positively stained was counted. Data were analyzed using SPSS software version 23. Descriptive for scale data, One way anova with post hoc Tukey's test for intergroup comparison.
RESULTS: The results showed significant P value <0.05. Expression of CK 19 was highest in reduced enamel epithelium, followed by dentigerous cyst and unicystic ameloblastoma.
CONCLUSION: CK 19 can be used as diagnostic marker to differentiate between odontogenic cyst and tumor. Copyright:
© 2021 Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cytokeratin 19; cytokeratins; immunohistochemistry; odontogenic tumors; reduced enamel epithelium

Year:  2021        PMID: 34349424      PMCID: PMC8272516          DOI: 10.4103/jomfp.JOMFP_316_19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Pathol        ISSN: 0973-029X


INTRODUCTION

Odontogenic cysts and tumors represent a group of neoplasms which originate from tooth-forming apparatus. The first signs of tooth development appear during the 6th week of gestation. At this stage, the oral epithelium thickens along the future dental arches. The primitive oral cavity or stomodeum is lined by an oral ectoderm or primitive oral epithelium. Each band of epithelium is called primary epithelial band; it divides into dental lamina and vestibular lamina. Remnants of the dental lamina are known to be the progenitors of certain cysts and tumors. The triggering factors and cells precisely involved in the pathogenesis of cysts and tumors are unknown. Various studies showed that the incidence of odontogenic cysts and tumors is common in jaws, in which odontogenic cysts are even more common in occurrence. Odontogenic cysts are classified into developmental and inflammatory cysts based on their origin. The origin of the developmental cysts is varied and is mainly attributed to the remnants of tooth germ. Dentigerous cyst is the most common developmental cyst that forms in up to 25% of all jaw cysts. Ameloblastoma is the common odontogenic tumor occurring in the jaws, with incidence ranging up to 60%.[1] Ameloblastoma is divided into three types based on clinical, radiological and histological features as solid ameloblastoma, unicystic ameloblastoma and desmoplastic ameloblastoma. Various studies have been performed to analyze the histopathogenesis of odontogenic cysts and tumors. One of such studies is related to detect antigen–antibody reaction of target cell, that is, immunohistochemistry (IHC). The biomarkers used in IHC stain specific cellular components of interest or rarely the entire cell. There is a vast array of biomarkers used to stain different sites, thereby helpful in diagnosing and evaluating the prognosis of the disease. Cytokeratins are the intermediate filaments found at the epithelial–epithelial cell junctions. The expression of these different cytokeratins and their combinations was found to be unique to certain neoplasms. IHC studies are known to be widely used in final diagnosis, prognosis and research. The present study is an IHC study aimed at detecting the cytokeratin 19 (CK19) in reduced enamel epithelium (REE), dentigerous cyst and unicystic ameloblastoma. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the expression of CK19 in REE, dentigerous cyst and unicystic ameloblastoma. The present study is also aimed to find a correlation between REE and dentigerous cyst and REE and unicystic ameloblastoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODOLOGY

The present study was conducted at G. Pulla Reddy Dental College and Hospital, Kurnool. The study involved comparison of CK19 expression in REE, dentigerous cyst and unicystic ameloblastoma. Histopathologically diagnosed cases of dentigerous cyst and unicystic ameloblastoma were taken from the archives of oral pathology and microbiology department. REE was retrieved from the patients undergoing surgery for impaction. Cases with impacted teeth completely embedded in the socket, were selected [Figure 1]. Infected dentigerous cysts and partially erupted teeth visible in the oral cavity were excluded from the study.
Figure 1

Gross picture of reduced enamel epithelium

Gross picture of reduced enamel epithelium For REE, the tissue was obtained during the surgical procedure for impaction. The tissue surrounding the impacted tooth which attached to the cementoenamel junction of the tooth was isolated. The tissue was then put immediately into a container containing 10% neutralized buffered formalin. The tissue was left overnight, that is, 24 h for optimal fixation. After tissue processing and embedding, routine H and E staining procedure was carried out for all sections. The slides were examined under a microscope and histologically diagnosed slides with REE were included in the study. IHC was carried out on all the selected samples of REE, dentigerous cyst and unicystic ameloblastoma. All the obtained 45 slides were examined under BX 43 microscope by Olympus manufacturers, with ProgRes microscope camera ProgRes® CapturePro microscope camera software from Jenoptic solutions software under urgery for impaction ×40 [Figure 2]. A total of 15 images were obtained. The total cell count per 100 cells was intended to measure in each image. Cell counting was carried out using software named QuPath Version 0.1.2 [Figure 3]. (developed by University of Edinburgh).The image properties were automatically detected by the software, as a H-DAB-stained slide. All the images were analyzed. The ROI was selected in the image, and the number of cells selected was taken as standard, that is, 100 cells. The number of cells stained positive and the number of cells stained negative were calculated.
Figure 2

Immunohistochemistry picture of reduced enamel epithelium

Figure 3

Positively stained cells in unicystic ameloblastoma

Immunohistochemistry picture of reduced enamel epithelium Positively stained cells in unicystic ameloblastoma

RESULTS

Data were analyzed using SPSS software version 23. The software is well known and doesn't require company name. If needed please add, SPSS software is developed by IBM. Descriptive for scale data, one way anova is performed and post hoc Tukey's test is done for intergroup comparison. Table 1 shows the mean positive percentage of cells showing the expression of CK19.
Table 1

Mean percentage of cytokeratin 19-positive cells in various groups

GroupnMinimumMaximumMeanSD
REE3039.0100.081.8916.10
DC302.099.064.2023.58
UA301.098.056.7733.13

SD: Standard deviation, REE: Reduced enamel epithelium, DC: Dentigerous cyst, UA: Unicystic ameloblastoma

Mean percentage of cytokeratin 19-positive cells in various groups SD: Standard deviation, REE: Reduced enamel epithelium, DC: Dentigerous cyst, UA: Unicystic ameloblastoma There was a statistically significant difference in the expression of CK19 in various groups (P = 0.001) [Figure 4]. ANOVA comparison explained the overall significance. To know the individual pair-wise comparisons, post hoc test should be done [Figures 5 and 6] [Table 2].
Figure 4

Bar chart showing percentage of cells positive for CK 19 in groups, REE: Reduced enamel epithelium, DC: Dentigerous cyst, UA: Unicystic ameloblastoma

Figure 5

Intergroup comparison of CK 19, REE: Reduced enamel epithelium, DC: Dentigerous cyst, UA: Unicystic ameloblastoma

Figure 6

Bar chart representing comparison of CK 19 expression between DC, UA and RE, REE: Reduced enamel epithelium, DC: Dentigerous cyst, UA: Unicystic ameloblastoma

Table 2

Overall intergroup comparison of expression of cytokeratin 19 (one-way ANOVA)

ComparisonSum of squaresdfMean squareFSignificant
Between groups9360.77624680.3887.1900.001*
Within groups54,682.83384650.986
Total64,043.60986

*Statistically significant (P<0.05)

Bar chart showing percentage of cells positive for CK 19 in groups, REE: Reduced enamel epithelium, DC: Dentigerous cyst, UA: Unicystic ameloblastoma Intergroup comparison of CK 19, REE: Reduced enamel epithelium, DC: Dentigerous cyst, UA: Unicystic ameloblastoma Bar chart representing comparison of CK 19 expression between DC, UA and RE, REE: Reduced enamel epithelium, DC: Dentigerous cyst, UA: Unicystic ameloblastoma Overall intergroup comparison of expression of cytokeratin 19 (one-way ANOVA) *Statistically significant (P<0.05) Table 3 shows the individual pair-wise comparisons. There was a statistically significant difference between the expression of CK19 in between REE and dentigerous cyst (DC) (P = 0.028) and REE and UA (P = 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the expression between DC and UA (P = 0.499).
Table 3

Individual pair-wise comparisons (post hoc Tukey’s test)

Group (I)Group (J)Mean difference (I-J)SESignificant
REEDC17.6889*6.76830.028*
UA25.1222*6.76830.001*
DCUA7.43336.58780.499 (NS)

*The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level. NS: Not significant (P>0.05), SE: Standard error, REE: Reduced enamel epithelium, DC: Dentigerous cyst, UA: Unicystic ameloblastoma

Individual pair-wise comparisons (post hoc Tukey’s test) *The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level. NS: Not significant (P>0.05), SE: Standard error, REE: Reduced enamel epithelium, DC: Dentigerous cyst, UA: Unicystic ameloblastoma Table 4 shows the order of expression of CK19, which is REE > DC ≥ UA.
Table 4

Order of expression of cytokeratin 19

GroupnSubset for α=0.05

LowHigh
UA3056.767
DC3064.200
REE3081.889
Significant0.5121.000

REE: Reduced enamel epithelium, DC: Dentigerous cyst, UA: Unicystic ameloblastoma. The order is REE > DC ≥ UA

Order of expression of cytokeratin 19 REE: Reduced enamel epithelium, DC: Dentigerous cyst, UA: Unicystic ameloblastoma. The order is REE > DC ≥ UA There was a statistically significant negative correlation between group and CK19 expression [Table 5].
Table 5

Correlation between groups and cytokeratin 19 expression

Correlations

StatisticsGroupCK19
Group
 Pearson’s correlation1−0.372**
 Significant (two tailed)0.000
n9090
CK19
 Pearson’s correlation−0.372**1
 Significant (two tailed)0.000
n9090

**Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (two tailed). CK: Cytokeratin

Correlation between groups and cytokeratin 19 expression **Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (two tailed). CK: Cytokeratin

DISCUSSION

The epithelium associated with odontogenic cysts and tumors is derived from one of the following sources: The REE of the tooth crown Epithelial rests of Malassez, which are remnants of the Hertwig root sheath Epithelial rests of Serres, which are remnants of the dental lamina The tooth germ itself, which includes the enamel organ, dental papilla and dental sac. The exact etiology and pathogenesis of odontogenic tumors is unfamiliar although recent studies have shown several molecular alterations in the formation of odontogenic tumors. Advanced research has shown that alteration in key genes is responsible for the growth of cells. Sonic Hedge Hog (SHH) signaling molecules such as smoothened homolog (SMO), phenylthiocarbamide (PTC) and zinc finger protein (GLI1) have been observed in a number of odontogenic tumors.[234] IHC is an important application to determine monoclonal as well as polyclonal antibodies distribution in the tissue of interest in health and disease. IHC is widely used for the diagnosis of cancers and tumors. Moll et al. classified a total of 19 human epithelial keratins with variable molecular weights within 40–70 kDa range, and subsequently an additional keratin was identified, CK20.[5] CK19 is the smallest one and it is exceptional because, unlike other cytokeratins, it lacks the typical domain. Owing to the histopathogenesis of both dentigerous cyst and unicystic ameloblastoma related to REE, the expression of CK19 in dentigerous cyst and unicystic ameloblastoma was consistent with P = 0.499. Significant P values were observed on comparing REE with dentigerous cyst and REE and unicystic ameloblastoma (P = 0.001). Various similar studies were carried out using CK19 as a marker for prognosis and final diagnosis of lesions involving epithelial tumors, such as hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, pancreatic tumors and breast carcinomas. Expression of CK19 in odontogenic tumors and cysts was also assessed and the usefulness of the marker was proven. The results showed that the expression of CK19 decreased from normal tissue, dentigerous cyst and tumor, with lowest expression of CK19 in tumor, with lowest expression of CK19 in tumor. Hence, CK19 can be used as a prognostic and a diagnostic marker for odontogenic lesions. The use of CK19 as a stem cell marker has been recently known and is more useful in understanding the histogenesis of the lesions. The present study emphasizes the significance of CK19 as a stem cell marker in odontogenic lesions also. The expression of CK19 was correlated with the histogenic origin of tissues arising at the site. As REE is predominantly involved with the occurrence of dentigerous cyst and its involvement with unicystic ameloblastoma is rare, the findings of the present study coincided with that of the literature. CK19 is an epithelial marker of simple epithelia, predominantly similar to that of odontogenic cystic lining in dentigerous cyst. It is discernible in simple epithelia and basal cells of nonkeratinized stratified squamous epithelia. In a study by Bhaskar et al., CK19 expression was more significantly present in dentigerous cyst when compared to that of odontogenic keratocyst and radicular cyst [6] In our study, CK19 was expressed at a significant percentage of 64% in dentigerous cyst next to REE. Tsuji et al. and Stoll et al. in their study found positive expression for CK19 in dentigerous cyst. They concluded that CK19 is a marker of odontogenic epithelium.[78] Comparison of the staining intensities of different panel markers between the odontogenic cyst (DC) and odontogenic tumor (ameloblastoma) confirms and supports that considerable difference exists between these two lesions in terms of their clinical characters and biologic behavior. Hence, IHC analysis used in this study may be useful in differentiating DC and ameloblastoma. Tsuji et al. and Stoll et al. in their study found positive expression for CK19 in dentigerous cyst.[78] They concluded that CK19 is a marker of odontogenic epithelium. Yajima-Himuro et al. assessed the expression of CK19 in tooth germs, odontogenic epithelial tumors and nonodontogenic epithelial tumors. CK19 was expressed in the cytoplasm of the odontogenic epithelial cells. Immunoreactivity for CK19 was detected in all epithelial cells of enamel organ and dental lamina. In their study, whole epithelial cells of enamel organ and dental lamina were diffusely positive for CK19. Expression of CK19 was diffusely present in all neoplastic cells of ameloblastomas. In the present study also, the expression of CK19 was observed in the components of enamel organ, that is REE. According to their study, CK19 was one of the characteristics of epithelial odontogenic tumors, which correlated with the present study. Odontogenic epithelial stem cells in humans are present in the active dental lamina in postnatal life, in remnants of dental lamina (the gubernaculum cord), in the epithelial cell rests of Malassez and in REE. The junctional epithelium and REE were proven to be odontogenic in origin and to have epithelial stem cell potential as reported by Yajima-Himuro et al. in 2014.[9] Cytokeratin, the intermediate filament, can serve as a marker system for epithelial cells at different stages of cellular differentiation. Cytokeratin markers can provide valuable supporting evidence in combination with standard marker system to subfractionate populations of stem, progenitor and differentiated cells in epithelial neoplasms. Overexpression of CK19 in REE reflects the immaturity of the tumor cell lineage, and may disrupt terminal differentiation and indicate the ability of cells to multiply.

CONCLUSION

Hence, CK19 may be used as a stem cell marker for the identification of cell of origin and also for understanding the pathogenesis of odontogenic cysts and tumors in a detailed aspect, thereby increasing the therapeutic approaches. CK19 can also be used as one of the diagnostic markers to differentiate between odontogenic cyst and tumor. Similar studies have to be undertaken to effectively rule out its importance in a broader perspective with a large sample size and appropriate molecular assays.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.
  9 in total

1.  Epithelial-mesenchymal signalling regulating tooth morphogenesis.

Authors:  Irma Thesleff
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 5.285

2.  Cytokeratin expression patterns for distinction of odontogenic keratocysts from dentigerous and radicular cysts.

Authors:  Christian Stoll; Carolin Stollenwerk; Dieter Riediger; Christian Mittermayer; Joachim Alfer
Journal:  J Oral Pathol Med       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.253

3.  A Comparative Analysis of Cytokeratin 18 and 19 Expressions in Odontogenic Keratocyst, Dentigerous Cyst and Radicular Cyst with a Review of Literature.

Authors:  Vikas Parshottam Bhakhar; Vandana Sandip Shah; Mohsin Jiva Ghanchi; Sandesh Sachchidanand Gosavi; Himanshu Mahesh Srivastava; Nivedita Javahir Pachore
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-07-01

4.  The expression of cytokeratin in keratocystic odontogenic tumor, orthokeratinized odontogenic cyst, dentigerous cyst, radicular cyst and dermoid cyst.

Authors:  Kaname Tsuji; Masahiro Wato; Teruyoshi Hayashi; Norihiro Yasuda; Takumi Matsushita; Tomohiko Ito; Shoko Gamoh; Hiroaki Yoshida; Akio Tanaka; Shosuke Morita
Journal:  Med Mol Morphol       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 2.309

Review 5.  Molecular genetics of tooth development.

Authors:  Marianna Bei
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 5.578

6.  Microvascular Density in Glaucomatous Eyes With Hemifield Visual Field Defects: An Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Study.

Authors:  Tadamichi Akagi; Yuto Iida; Hideo Nakanishi; Noriko Terada; Satoshi Morooka; Hiroshi Yamada; Tomoko Hasegawa; Satoshi Yokota; Munemitsu Yoshikawa; Nagahisa Yoshimura
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-06-11       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  Epidemiological study of odontogenic tumours: An institutional experience.

Authors:  Govind R K Nalabolu; Arif Mohiddin; Santhosh K S Hiremath; Ravikanth Manyam; T Sreenivasa Bharath; P Ramanjaneya Raju
Journal:  J Infect Public Health       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 3.718

8.  The junctional epithelium originates from the odontogenic epithelium of an erupted tooth.

Authors:  Sara Yajima-Himuro; Masamitsu Oshima; Gou Yamamoto; Miho Ogawa; Madoka Furuya; Junichi Tanaka; Kousuke Nishii; Kenji Mishima; Tetsuhiko Tachikawa; Takashi Tsuji; Matsuo Yamamoto
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  The human keratins: biology and pathology.

Authors:  Roland Moll; Markus Divo; Lutz Langbein
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 4.304

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.